Essential Afro-Latino/ Caribbean Current Events

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,154
Reputation
10,624
Daps
121,954
Assembly of Caribbean People Ratifies Solidarity with Just Causes

asamblea-pueblos-caribe.jpg


Port of Spain, August 19 (Prensa Latina) The Assembly of Caribbean People (ACP) on Monday called for solidarity with just causes, in rejection of the aggressive and interventionist policies of the United States and its allies.

On releasing its closing report, delegates to the eighth edition of the ACP reiterated their solidarity with Nicolás Maduro's Bolivarian project in Venezuela and their rejection of the U.S. blockade against Cuba.

In addition, participants pronounced themselves in favor of Puerto Rico's independence, the freedom of former Brazilian President Luis Ignacio Lula da Silva and reparations for Haiti.

The members of the delegations of 13 nations attending the event agreed on the need to multiply the Proclamation of Latin America and the Caribbean as a Zone of Peace, a fundamental tool given the imperialist aims of the current U.S. administration.

During debates, social movement representatives pointed to the extensive resources allocated by the right wing to the grossest manipulation of justice, in order to discredit popular political leaders.

The delegates raised their voices against global capitalism and its impact on the economic, social, cultural and sustainable development of the Caribbean peoples, causing the outbreak of different types of speculative bubble and economic crises.

Given the current scenario, they agreed to create a fraternal network of all the countries of the region, to challenge isolation and realize the dream of Latin American and Caribbean integration, as envisioned by the region's Independence heroes over 200 years ago.

According to the final declaration, the next edition of the Assembly of Caribbean People will take place in Haiti in 2021.

lrg/cg/apz/mem/otf

Assembly of Caribbean People Ratifies Solidarity with Just Causes

EChZLCYXUAEUDn8
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,154
Reputation
10,624
Daps
121,954
The First National Meeting of Terreiro Peoples celebrates resistance in Minas Gerais

More than 400 leaders unite to build democratic dialogue against the advance of authoritarism

Agatha Azevedo
Brasil de Fato | Belo Horizonte, June 14 2019 16:41


48067615708_616017a850_z.jpg

During the meeting, resistance is celebrated through ancestry and respect / Rafael Stedile

The National Meeting of Terreiro Peoples is held in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, from June 13 to 16 under the theme “Égbé – the I and the other”. The schedule includes analyzes on the political conjuncture of Brazil and the world, discussion boards on topics such as black women and ancestral knowledge, religious racism, symbolic representations of black cultures and African diasporic religions, education and defense strategies for body and nature, among others.

According to the National Center for Africanness and Afro-Brazilian Resistance (Centro Nacional de Africanidade e Resistência Afro-brasileira – Cenarab) the goal is to analyze in depth the current scenario so that strategies, tactics of struggle, resistance and organization are collectively mapped out.

48063653478_209c9bcf09_o.jpg

João Paulo Rodrigues, member of the national directorate of the Landless Workers' Movement (Movimento dos Trabalhadores Sem Terra – MST), giving a speech during the meeting. (Photo: Rafael Stedile)

Fabya Reis, of the State Secretariat for the Promotion of Racial Equality of Bahia, reinforces the importance of the meeting to discuss and outline strategies against religious racism, and to continue organizing terreiro peoples to ensure public policies to combat intolerance. She values the ancestral power of African diasporic religions to subvert the pain of forced slavery and the process of denial of rights.

"We have been subjected to civilization's barbarism of the enslavement of free people. Let us not let our minds be imprisoned, and in the effort to live the contemporary challenges – to paraphrase Mãe Estela; we miss you –, I am sure that now is our time to act for the life of young black people, for the lives of black women, for the free terreiro peoples, for Lula's freedom, yes", she said.

The opening session debated the international conjuncture, in order to think how terreiro peoples can formulate a process of resistance against the advance of authoritarism. Resistance is celebrated through ancestry, care and respect. Thus, the attending leaders initiate a commitment to fight together against social injustice and combat prejudice against African diasporic religions.

Representatives from Brazil, Venezuela, Haiti, the United States, Uruguay, Cuba and Nigeria exchanged experiences of struggling against institutional racism and setbacks in public policies for the inclusion and acceptance of terreiro peoples throughout the world – especially in the present context where authoritarian governments are rising.

The first step in the political organization of African diasporic religions in the struggle for recognition and freedom is unity. That's what state representative Andreia de Jesus says, according to whom organization and unity are the way to sew possible dialogue fabrics between those who fight. "Europeans, by colonizing America, globalized Africa. We are in many countries today, we are the majority in a lot of countries, and that's where our strength resides", she said.

One of the proposals of the meeting is to set up a committee to observe the allegations of cases of religious racism, violation of the rights of black women in Brazil and attack on African diasporic religious practices.

On Friday (14), the day of the General Strike throughout Brazil, the participants of the meeting produced a letter in support of the protesters and against the Social Security reform, which can be read in its entirety:

"Letter from the Terreiro Peoples in defense of social rights and the General Strike

The oldest logic of survival and resistance is for us, by us, always! An Ubuntu principle which is a Zulu word and means: ‘’you become a person through other people’’; in other words, I AM BECAUSE YOU ARE.

With this widely secular feeling of protection of the strongest values, we, left-wing Terreiro Peoples, united in the Ègbé – The I and the Other National Meeting, believe in and defend the importance and legitimacy of fighting the growing fascist wave that is plaguing Brazil and other Latin American countries by means of a maroon agglutination.

We are women and men of Axé; very different, plural, continental, but with something that unites us: our faith, our ancestry, our terreiros. We know from the Itans, Orikis, how the collective construction of our religious practices took place in the diversity of thoughts. Today we are heirs to a magical tradition in which being different was instrumental in ensuring unity was maintained in the midst of adversity.

Therefore, creating a space for understanding our political positions centered on leftist thinking is fundamental to consolidate an alliance among those who organize based on the traditions of our religiosity. This is, for us, the most efficient way to combat theocracy in the Brazilian state, as well as religious racism and related intolerances.

Democracy and the secular state have been insistently weakened by the construction of legal frameworks with political intentions to strengthen the ultra-right in the country, through conspiracies that violently imprisoned comrade Lula, for example. And along the same lines, the incarceration of the black population, as well as the religious racism that makes robust the countless violations of African diasporic religions as the astonishing data brought by the research institutes nowadays show.

In this sense, we want a space to build a great “network” that brings together the points of our unity: surviving and resisting the neo-fascist state, establishing democracy in our country — starting from the premise that the right organizes itself seeking to destroy unity — and the rule of law not only in Brazil, but on a worldwide scale. And this organization must be done with the working class as a whole. Only the organized people are able to defeat the counter-reforms proposed by the Bolsonaro government, especially reforms on social security, labor laws and the dismantling of public education and the health system.

That's why, on this Friday (14), the capacity of mobilization of the Brazilian people is indicative of the size of resistance of grassroots organizations to face this period. We reaffirm that, just as many other sectors of the working class, we, Terreiro Peoples, are building the daily struggle and resistance in our communities and on the streets. The unity of the working class entails the construction of organizational tactics and strategies that also consider the daily struggle in defense of our territories and traditions.

Therefore, in addition to reaffirming the need to look for ways to keep our organizations, our temples and our practices together, we must also think that more than ever our unity is the possibility of actually being what in our tradition is called Ubuntu: We Are Only Because The Other Is. That's why we stand in defense of social rights and the General Strike as a legitimate instrument of struggle, because the woven around a political project for the country must involve the black population of this country, who struggles to keep its ancestry and existence alive.

Ègbé – The I and the other – National Meeting of Terreiro Peoples

Belo Horizonte – Minas Gerais, June 14 2019".

Editing: Daniel Giovanaz

The First National Meeting of Terreiro Peoples celebrates resistance in Minas Gerais
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,154
Reputation
10,624
Daps
121,954
"Religion and politics": spirituality is fighting ground for the Afro-descendant population

Sheila Walker and Chucho García speak on the book Conhecimento desde dentro – os afro-sul-americanos falam dos seus povos

Agatha Azevedo
Brasil de Fato | Belo Horizonte (Minas Gerais), June 18 2019 08:15


48081028517_e01da7d0c1_z.jpg

North-American Sheila Walker and Venezuelan Jesus Chucho García debate black resistance / Photo: Geledés/Rafael Stedile

During the Ègbé – The I and the other 1st National Meeting of Terreiro Peoples, held last Saturday (15) and Sunday (16), in Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, anthropologist and director of the NGO Afrodiáspora Sheila Walker debated the importance of political organization for Terreiro Peoples in Brazil and throughout the Americas and uniting to resist the advance of authoritarianism and conservatism.

In an interview with Brasil de Fato, Walker and Venezuelan Jesus Chucho García, who works for the rights of Afro-descendants in his country, discuss the role of theoretical elaboration in recovering the history of the black diaspora in the Americas, and the importance of understanding religiosity as a disputed fighting ground in the current international conjuncture.

Brasil de Fato: Sheila, in your lectures, it's possible to identify the presence of an Afro-diasporic political and religious construction in a context of oppression in the United States. How did this construction begin?

Sheila Walker: As an African-American in the United States, it's hard not to be in the struggle for equality in one way or another. I have a Ph.D. in Anthropology, because I thought Anthropology was a wonderful discipline to learn about the other, to appreciate the other. When I was 4 years old, I would go to my aunt's house, my grandmother's sister, who lived in the Chinese neighborhood, and there they spoke differently, their faces looked different, they were different and I was fascinated with the possibility of getting to know the other. I wanted to travel, but at 4 years old, I couldn't. So when I turned 19 I went to Cameroon and lived with a wonderful Pan-Africanist family who would ask me difficult questions, because I didn't know the diaspora and I didn't know a lot of things — because I lived in the U.S. — so I began to notice my ignorance of the black world.

I was studying at an elite white university, and I was the only black student in my class. So I now understand that this visit I made to Cameroon in Central Africa was an antidote to my alienating education. I had grown up in an integrated community, always went to school with everyone, but in social life, blacks were on one side and whites on the other, by custom, not by law. I'm from Northern U.S., and my family was working class, but wasn't in the struggle. My generation started this.

Was this the moment when religiosity entered your life as well? How is it linked to politics?

Sheila: I began attending a Baptist Church, in Northern U.S., and I noticed that when music started heating up – and it needs to get hot in our churches, or else no one participates – there were some very well dressed ladies who started to jump and I would think: “What is this?”. I didn't understand it, and they would tell me “It's the holy ghost”. I was 8 years old, and nobody ever explained to me how the ghost works or where it comes from, and when I went to my first Candomblé cerimony in Bahia I recognized the gestures, the moving of the shoulders, for example, like when the Orixá arrives. So I said: “Ah, now I understand where the ghost comes from”, and it was within African-American Protestantism, which is not like Protestantism in Brazil, that I understood where our Africanness comes into play in the United States.

These churches aren't just spirituality houses, one of their functions in our lives is political organization, economic organization. It's not a coincidence that many of our black leaders are church pastors, like Reverend Martin Luther King. So it's not just the holy ghost, it's also politics. Religion is also politics. In Southern U.S. everything was segregated by law, black people had to stay in the back of the bus, if there was a seat, so when Rosa Parks didn't give up her seat to a white man and went to jail, what happened afterwards? A church meeting. There was a whole resistance system which began in the Church. Church is part of my cultural life, but I never understood these stories of the Christian church, I find Candomblé more interesting, more dynamic and prettier, if I had to define my spirituality, I would say it's more Candomblé than Protestantism, but it's important for me to know Church culture because it is the basis for our African-American culture in general.

I was thinking, does Candomblé, for example, have this kind of function in people's lives or is it just spirituality? Well, here we are. It's for spirituality, but it's not just that.

How did your intellectual and political thought develop in this context of understanding Africanness in the United States?

Sheila: When I was in grad school in the University of Chicago, it was during the period when they started letting more than one black student in the universities. We were a critical mass. But we realized as time went on that, of course being there was a privilege, but where were we? We weren't in the books, they didn't tell our experience, and I think this was the beginning of my struggle, and I noticed that my role was an intellectual role so that our existence was part of the curriculum. So we began to ask for more classes about us, and we went from asking to making non-negotiable demands. I noticed that my role in the struggle is to see the reality of the African diaspora in America and the Atlantic, to see our contributions, and debunk the lies we learned in the Pan-American education system.

Is it from this need to rethink Afro-diasporic scientific production that your book Conhecimento desde dentro – os afro-sul-americanos falam dos seus povos e suas histórias is born?

Sheila: Yes. In our book the peoples talk about themselves, we consider that we are having an act of intellectual quilombismo, cimarronaje. One element of my fighting attitude is the fact that my teachers have shown me that the discipline of Anthropology is not made to know the other but to dominate the other, it is an imperialist creation, but I thought I could use the tools to study what I wanted to study, and understand more the diaspora and our ties to Africa. They made an effort to make me believe we had no culture, and it was written by great American sociologists at the same time as cultural diplomacy was happening, and what was the content? Our “non-existent” culture. From 1956 on, the U.S. was sending jazz musicians around the world to show that this is U.S. culture, which represents our country in the world, but jazz is our black culture that they said didn't exist.

What we did was invite people from various South American countries, representatives from 9 Hispanophone countries, and that have knowledge of reality. Many didn't attend college, but still have their experiences, their Africanness. Our mission was to give the possibility to our cousins in the South to seize the content of their culture and what are the Afro-diasporic communitity's contributions in their countries. Even tango, from Argentina, where they say there is no black people, is a Bantu word with a hidden history. One element of this book is the comparative perspective, understanding and recognizing oneself from knowing the other's culture, and we had to create a lot of words for these theories that did not exist and were not spoken. The only explanation for some of our behaviors is our African origin.

Chucho, what do you, as an author of one chapter of this book, consider culture of resistance in this Afro-South-American territory?

Jesus Chucho García: Well, in my reflecting I bring five types of cimarronaje: frontal, legal, ethical, cultural and spiritual. Do you know what is cimarrón and cimarrona? When we would escape the slave system, they would call us cimarrón and cimarrona because we would break the chains. It's how, here in Brazil, Zumbi dos Palmares was a cimarrón, a quilombola. The first cimarronaje is the frontal assault against the master, against slavery, against oppression, and we would fight in the plantation and escape looking for a free space, the quilombo in Brazil, the palenque in Colombia and Cuba, the cumbe in Venezuela and so on.

The second was legal cimarronaje. Many Africans brought as prisoners – I don't say enslaved, they were prisoners doing forced labor in prisons called sugarcane, coffee and cocoa plantations – had a legal space where they could buy their freedom, or for example, when there was an escape in a slave country, if they got to an enemy country, they were considered freed, and when they accepted the Roman Catholic Church. Then, we had ethical cimarronaje, which is the claiming of African values by the quilombos, but also the struggles of the peoples, like in the struggle for the liberation of Haiti, who later also ethically helped the struggle for independence of Venezuela, Panama, Colombia, Peru, Bolivia and Ecuador with international armies, in an international display of solidarity among the peoples.

Another type is cultural cimarronaje, the culture of resistance, which had three moments: the preservation of the original culture expressed through music, dance and cuisine; the creation stage where, facing a new situation, they had to take elements of the indigenous culture, certain aspects of the dominant culture, and there was an interesting creation process – Brazil is an example of African and indigenous cultures were combined –; and then were was innovation as a culture of resistance. We began to innovate, we began to have new elements, if samba here is a starting point of the culture of Congolese origin, it started taking elements of the European culture until it created bossa nova, and so it was with other rhythms.

Lastly, there is spiritual cimarronaje, which was how we conserved our spirituality, and it's what explains how even after four hundred, five hundred years, Yoruba culture is still alive, Congolese culture is still alive, Vodu culture is still alive. That's an example of spirituality as part of resistance. They might have taken a piece of my body, scourged me, ripped out a hand, but they never touched my soul, my faith. Spirituality is the faith in the struggle to claim our humanity.

In your opinion, what is the importance of this 1st National Meeting of Terreiro Peoples for advancing the struggle of Afro-descendant peoples in the current scenario?

Sheila: For me, the fact there are people from various places is a force to be reckoned with. It's a start, this level of organization coming from the people of axé is very important, especially in this retrograde moment we are living here (in Brazil) and in the United States. But I want to talk more about the racist and sexist man occupying the White House, because he's so bad he's provoking wonderful reactions: now we have more young women in Congress, among our representatives there's a Palestinian woman, a Puerto Rican, a Somali migrant refugee, and so on... we are resisting, he provoked strong reactions, and women are protagonists in this fight.

In Brazil, self-declared Afro-descendants are 54% of the population, in the United States we are something like 13% of the population, but we are organized, and if this 54% manage to achieve unity, it would be a huge advance for this country, and that's what begins here at this meeting. I hope the terreiros and casas have a more political behavior, I hope they don't see themselves just as a religion, but as the basis for economic and political behaviors, for unity against the oppressors, with the responsibility of having a political behavior capable of uniting. When Africans arrived, oppression was much bigger than now and they still managed to organize to preserve the orixás. The fact that we are here now is proof that we are organizing to change the system in our favor.

Chucho: I think that in the first decade of the 21st Century, we proved the possibility of change, the progressive governments of Lula, Chávez, Mujica, well, during this moment there was a lot of inclusion. They opened a possibility that with more humane and progressive governments, we could have more participation, even with the mistakes they made, of course. But the racist, chauvinist and sexist right took advantage of these mistakes to involve the people. Many poor Brazilians voted for Bolsonaro, as many poor people in Southern U.S. voted for Trump, but that has to do with the lack of knowledge, rights and information. But the people resisting are the Afro-descendants, we have to have more political participation so we can have more decision-making power, the political recovering of the Afro-descendant movement will have a global influence and that is our hope.

Editing: Pedro Ribeiro Nogueira

"Religion and politics": spirituality is fighting ground for the Afro-descendant population
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,154
Reputation
10,624
Daps
121,954
Hybrid Wars Are Destroying Democracies: The Thirty-Fourth Newsletter (2019).

AUGUST 22, 2019 |

ee92fa2c-668e-4ebc-9962-26339c3724c6.jpg

Eria Sane Nsubuga, Abeekalakasa temwesembereza mmundu (Avoid Guns when in Public Places), 2014.

Dear Friends,



Greetings from the desk of the Tricontinental: Institute for Social Research.

In Brazil recently, I gave an interview to Brasil de Fato, which was born in 2003 as the weekly magazine of the World Social Forum. It is now one of the most important windows into Brazil’s political world. The newsletter this week carries the text of most of the interview.

b85e7bec-0629-4264-9e91-c15b45e451e3.jpg


Brasil de Fato: The first question is about the image of Jair Bolsonaro’s government around the world. You travel a lot; you are a journalist. We would like to know how the international press views the Bolsonaro phenomenon. What aspects of his government have been the most talked about around the world?

Vijay Prashad: Well, I think the first thing to seriously look at is that people like Bolsonaro are seen as slightly comical. There is a narrative that has developed about the comical nature of contemporary heads of government: Boris Johnson, Donald Trump, Bolsonaro. He is part of this sort of rogues’ gallery of comical characters.

13191d8a-ece8-40e4-88fe-fe5d08ad0657.png

Dossier no. 14: Brazil’s Amazon: The Wealth of the Earth Generates the Poverty of Humankind.

But there is something that has alarmed people. Not only the liberals, but even others. There are two major carbon sinks in the world. One is on the island of Papua, both West Papua and Papua New Guinea. And the other is the Amazon. And I think it’s really quite chilling for people that Mr. Bolsonaro has decided to open the Amazon to the logging industry and so on. He has basically allowed logging and food lobbies to create policy. And I know that even in a newspaper like The New York Times, there was quite a strong story about Bolsonaro’s Amazon policy.

It is one thing to say that Bolsonaro is comical and has got terrible social positions. But when you start to destroy the Amazon, that has implications for the whole planet. So that is actually something that sensitive, decent – and also not so sensitive people – are quite worried about.

3730a73c-8385-42e5-8e8c-56cd6d3faa1e.jpg

Dimosthenis Kokkinidis, And regarding the remembrance of evils, July 1967.

In the last decade, the term BRICS [Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa] has become popular in Brazil. These countries began to articulate themselves and threaten US hegemony in the international scene. Is it possible to say that the election of Bolsonaro, who is so close to Trump, can dismantle this organisation?

We should never exaggerate groups of nations. When they come together to create some kind of grouping, we should not exaggerate what it is. BRICS was always going to be only as good as the class character of the government in the different States.

Before BRICS, when India, Brazil, and South Africa formed a bloc, it was called IBSA. It still exists. At the time, the governments in India, Brazil, and South Africa were relatively social democratic. They pushed an agenda for pharmaceutical drugs and for farm subsidies. The point was that they were worried about the fact that people couldn’t access drugs – medicine – and that the farmers in their countries were being badly hit by trade policies. At the time, they were social democratic, in 2003, when IBSA was formed.

When BRICS was created in 2009, it already had three agendas. One agenda they drew from IBSA was to fight for better trade agreements, to protect farmers, and so on. The second one was for a limited kind of multilateralism. It was just that the elites of Brazil, India, South Africa, China, Russia should have a place at the table. That was the second goal of BRICS. The third goal of BRICS was South-South business cooperation: Indian businesses with Brazilian businesses, Brazilian exports to South Africa and so on.

BRICS was always limited by the class character of the governments. Businesses in Brazil want to enter markets in India. BRICS is not going to dissolve. People just think BRICS is a political instrument, that idea of multilateralism. But that’s a very wrong approach to BRICS. BRICS is not just a political instrument, it’s for business in this part of the world, militaries, arms deals, all kinds of things. They are not things that you and I are going to be happy with.

The advancement of the far right in different regions has imposed an interesting debate on the use of the term ‘fascism’. There are theorists who say that fascism occurred in Italy in a specific 20th century context and can’t be compared with any other government or regime. Other analysts say that the similarities are so great that it is impossible to call them by any other name. How do you position yourself in this discussion? Should we call them fascists or not? Or should we not worry about those terms now?

These debates are important. The issue is not to have the right analysis by yourself. The issue is to have a debate to clarify how we understand the current situation. The reason why we go back and look at the 1920s and 1930s is because we want to understand what authoritarianism within democracy looked like then? Because, after all, [Benito] Mussolini and [Adolf] Hitler came to power through democracy, through the ballot box. And then they deepened the authoritarian role of politics in society.

But the context that produced Hitler and Mussolini, the fascists and the Nazis, was very different from the context now. Then, their main assignment, as it were, from the capitalists, from the bourgeoisie, was to come to power and smash the workers’ movement. That was the main assignment of classical Nazis and fascists in the early 20th century. Today, workers’ movements are much weaker. The assignment from the bourgeoisie is not, ‘hey, fascist, come back to power and destroy the workers’ movement’. It’s not the same situation. It’s wrong to argue by analogy, saying that ‘now we have leaders that say terrible things, they want to lock up journalists, it’s similar to then, therefore it’s the same’. No. Let’s look at the current context for what it is.

Since the neoliberal period, neoliberal policy has had two effects. One is, it has really weakened the power of workers, peasants, all kinds of workers in society to organise themselves. It’s not just that the bargaining power of workers and peasants has decreased. Their capacity to organise themselves has decreased. I think this is very important.

So, we have less powerful peasant and workers’ unions now. That created a combustible situation where the bourgeoisie was getting wealthier and wealthier in this period. Thomas Piketty has the data to prove what we already know: there is immense inequality. The bourgeoisie is highly worried about the rise of inequality, the potential that some sort of unrest is going to come. We saw riots break out against the elite – food riots, the Caracazo in Venezuela.

At that point, you see a sharpening of a right-wing turn in ideology, where the elite starts to target certain populations, feminists, minorities, refugees, migrants, and say it’s because of them. ‘You don’t have a job because of a migrant’. It was the neoliberals that actually introduced these ideas into the political discourse to maintain control over the system.

But the neoliberals exhausted themselves. Everybody knows they were responsible for inequality; they were responsible for degradation. And it’s at that point – the left being so weak – that the right appears, the far right, the authoritarian right. And they take what neoliberals introduced. Neoliberals said, ‘we shouldn’t allow too much migration, it’s going to destroy our jobs’. So, they took that to its extreme and made it really vicious and nasty. And they came to power.

The way I understand the growth of these neo-authoritarians, these neofascists, is that they are not conventional 20th-century fascists. There is something quite different. They actually don’t need to destroy the institutions of democracy. They are merely hollowing them out. You still have elections, you still have parliaments, you still have all this stuff. They don’t need a dictatorship, because they’ve hollowed out the concept of democracy. So, by authoritarian and ideological means, they empty democracy, they empty the press, they empty the ability for people to have discussions, and that is how they create this very right-wing viciousness.

So, it’s different from the early 20th century. There is something to learn from that in order to sharpen our analysis, but we need to have an analysis of the concrete conditions of this period.

34458950-c4a8-4e32-b6d2-e434e43027cb.png

Dossier no. 18. The Only Answer is to Mobilise the Workers.

A dossier published in July by the Tricontinental Institute showed that the level of informality of workers in India is close to 90 percent, and unionisation rates are very low. Here in Brazil, trade unions have been the target of many attacks by the last two presidents. Is it possible to think of organising labor movements fighting for their demands outside the union structure, outside the trade union? Is there an alternative outside this formal organisation structure?


The point of unionising or building trade unions is not to build a union. The point of this whole struggle is to build the confidence and capacity of workers and peasants. The goal is not to have a trade union. It is to have an organised working class and peasantry that is able to challenge the bourgeoisie politically. That is the point. Just having a union is not enough.

We understand that unions are very important, but they are not the goal. Unions are merely a form to strengthen the power of the working class. Unions have understood that it is getting harder and harder to organise workers at the point of production. Factories have become like prisons. The workday is so highly regimented, it’s like a barracks in there. You can’t go to the bathroom, can’t look up from your desk, can’t talk to each other. If you look at today’s factories, they are really ruthless constructions of hyper-productivity. Because of that difficulty, the unions have started to think, ‘let’s organise workers where they live’. Because the point is to organise workers. Now, if you organise workers where they live, then they can take the fight to the factory. You were not able to organise them at the factory gate, so unions are becoming very creative about how they are building worker power. And that’s what we need to start looking at: opportunities to build the power of workers and peasants.

Of course, the production site is important. Of course, factories and agribusinesses are so important. But if you can organise workers elsewhere, if they have confidence elsewhere, if they build their strength elsewhere, they will take that experience directly to the factory.

Unions are experimenting with new processes. That’s why we are interested in looking to see, what are unions doing and where are they doing it.

861fcbf2-ae1c-4b67-95fc-49989f101ffb.png

Dossier no. 17. Venezuela and Hybrid Wars in Latin America.

But what is getting clearer and clearer and clearer is this concept of hybrid war. That there is a hybrid war at work in the planet. People need to understand that this hybrid war is a battle against democracy.

I was at the Curitiba [Free Lula] vigil a few weeks ago, and they asked me to give a talk. I gave a talk saying that democracy is in prison. Lula is a human being. Lula led a government when there was a certain balance of class forces at the time of his government. The question isn’t – do you like Lula? Do you not like Lula? This is a ridiculous discussion. The real question is that the assault on Lula’s right to run for the presidency was an attack on democracy. And that’s how we have to understand it, and that’s how we have to explain to people that it’s happening all around the world.

Democratic processes are essentially being destroyed in the service of having a very limited form of elite government against the people. That’s the basic issue.

Warmly, Vijay.

Hybrid Wars Are Destroying Democracies: The Thirty-Fourth Newsletter (2019).
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,154
Reputation
10,624
Daps
121,954
FARC-EP commanders will take up arms again after “Colombian State's betrayal of the Peace Accords”

August 29 2019

126885.jpg_1718483347-580x276.jpg

The group denounced the continuous murdering of social leaders and forced displacement, major issues affecting Colombia. Photo: teleSUR.

In response to the “betrayal of the Colombian State to the Peace Accords” signed in Havana in 2016, a group of commanders of the insurgent group Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia—People's Army (FARC–EP) announced on Thursday the start of a new stage of struggle.

Through a statement the leader of the insurgent group, Iván Márquez, invoked “the universal right of peoples to rise in arms against oppression”.

“Our strategic objective is the peace of Colombia with social justice (...) that is our flag, the flag of peace”, said Márquez.

Among those who accompany him, there are the leaders Jesús Santrich and Hernán Darío Velásquez, El Paisa, who find themselves open to the Special Jurisdiction for Peace (Jurisdicción Especial para la Paz, JEP).

The group denounced the continuous murdering of social leaders and demobilized ex-combatants, major problems affecting the South American country, as some of the causes for the return to the armed struggle.

The leader called for unity and peace in Colombia, and urged the people to fight corruption and impunity.

“We will not continue the killing among our class brothers so that a shameless oligarchy continues to manage our destiny and get richer and richer at the cost of the people's poverty and war dividends”, said Márquez.

Those who take up arms again will lose benefits from the Peace Deal, says JEP

colombia-jep-farc-ep-armas-acuerdo-paz-el-espectador-compressor.jpeg_1718483347.jpeg

JEP currently administers justice to 11,986 people who were directly or indirectly involved in the armed conflict in Colombia. Photo: The Spectator

The Special Jurisdiction for Peace (JEP, Spanish acronym) stated that those members of the FARC–EP who decide to take up arms will lose the benefits established by the Peace Deal signed in Havana in 2016.

The president of JEP, Patricia Linares indicated, at a press conference, that the news of rearmament of some ex-combatants of the FARC–EP is a serious problem for the peace process in Colombia.

Linares said that “If this FARC–EP group take up arms again it will lose all the benefits established in the Peace Deal”.

The official stated that JEP's Examining Room and Appeal Division began the process of expelling Iván Márquez, Jesús Santrich, El Paisa and other ex-combatants who took up arms again from the Integrated System of Truth, Justice, Reparation and Non-Repetition.

“We cannot disappoint the confidence of the victims, of Colombian society, of the international community and of the participants who, joining forces for the peace of Colombia, have built a real and viable alternative for our country”, said Linares.

Colombian political party FARC: Despite the obstacles, we are on the side of peace

The president of the Colombian Common Alternative Revolutionary Force (FARC) political party, Rodrigo Londoño (Timochenko), reiterated on Thursday that “the great majority remains committed to the agreement, even with all the difficulties or dangers we are facing, we are on the side of peace

Londoño's declarations became known after the announcement of the group of leaders of the once Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia—People's Army (FARC–EP) in which they announced the start of a new stage of struggle in response to the “Colombian State's betrayal of the Peace Accords” signed in 2016.

In the images circulated by the media, Márquez is seen along with Jesús Santrich and Hernán Darío Velásquez, El Paisa, who face open cases before the Special Jurisdiction for Peace.

On his behalf, Londoño emphasized that “despite the obstacles and difficulties, we are convinced that the path of peace is the right one”.

“Something that Manuel Marulanda (founder of the FARC-EP) taught us was to keep our word. Our word today is peace and reconciliation. More than 90 percent of former guerrillas remain committed to the peace process”, he said.

FARC-EP commanders will take up arms again after “Colombian State's betrayal of the Peace Accords”
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,154
Reputation
10,624
Daps
121,954
Black doctors from Brazil against racism in a profession reserved for the white elite

August 20 2019 | 18:41

1088428166.jpg

© Photo: Colectivo Negrex

Rio de Janeiro (Sputnik) — The shortage of black doctors in the country with the largest black population outside of Africa is one of the most visible symptoms of structural racism in Brazil.

For the past few years, young black medical students and newly trained doctors have a tool to reclaim their space and fight against prejudices: the Negrex collective.

1088433546.jpg

© Photo: Colectivo Negrex

1088428124.jpg

© Photo: Colectivo Negrex

1088428082.jpg

© Photo: Colectivo Negrex

One of its founders, Monique França, 31 years old and from Rio de Janeiro, told Sputnik how the idea came about: "We were in an annual meeting of medical students from all over the country in Belo Horizonte (Southeast region) and there around 400 people, but only 12 people were black... We felt we needed a space to discuss race issues in medicine, the health of the black population... we needed a place where we could feel welcome".

According to 2014 data from the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, pretos and pardos are the majority of the Brazilian population (53.6%), but this percentage doesn't translate into the daily life of medical schools and hospitals.

The Federal University of Rio de Janeiro concluded in a study conducted this year that only 17.6% of medical professionals are black.

Monique admits that today, in her work as a family doctor in the city of Valença (on the countryside of the state of Rio de Janeiro), she still notices the looks of surprise and distrust of some patients when they discover the doctor who's going to attend to them is black.

For that and for many other reasons Negrex was born; it now has about 500 members throughout the country and promotes periodic meetings, workshops and conferences, having as one of its priorities the work on raising awareness in public schools, where black students and poor families are the majority.

"It's sad to not know that there is a life after high school, that you can continue studying (...) wanting that individually is very cruel, how am I going to have that click on my head that makes me want to do something different? If the person never had contact with someone who went to college, how can I expect them to say they want to go to college? That's why it's good to go to schools and say: I'm just like you and now I'm a doctor".

França spent a good chunk of her childhood in the Cidade de Deus favela in Rio de Janeiro, in a humble family where there were no college students: she had everything against her to enroll in the most disputed courses in Brazil, but she did it with the help of scholarships and a strong family support network.

However, she points out that she does not want to fall for the dangerous narrative of 'meritocracy', because the effort is not the same for everyone; students like her had to do double the work, and she remembers her days as a student activist; while white colleagues were mobilizing to demand improvements in public funding from the government, some black colleagues had more prosaic urgencies, such as paying the bus ticket to go to college.

Monique studied at the Rio de Janeiro State University, a prestigious public university that 15 years ago became a pioneer in Brazil when it applied the quota system: reservation of admissions for poor, black and indigenous students and students from public schools.

This policy, which was applied at the national level during former president Dilma Rousseff's government, changed the face of Brazilian universities and made them much more diverse, although there is still a long way to go: in 2003, black people were 2% of the Rio de Janeiro State University academic community, the percentage grew until it reached 12% last year.

Across Brazil, the percentage of black people that finished higher education increased from 2% in 1998 to 6% in 2013, according to data from the Ministry of Education.

In the last months, president Jair Bolsonaro's allies, such as deputy Rodrigo Amorim (of the Social Liberal Party from Rio de Janeiro) have been presenting legislative initiatives to end this affirmative action policy.

"It's something strategic, they're afraid that people might know that they have the potential to be what they want; people need opportunities and those opportunities have to be public, that's what we pay taxes for. Ending quotas and cutting funding is a strategy to maintain the oligarchy", says França.

For this young doctor, there's no doubt that a part of the Brazilian elite with the new spaces that black and poor people have conquered recently, although she prefers to focus on the positive effects that representativeness has on many of her patients, who are not used to being attended by someone with their same skin tone.

"It's good that they see that the speaker doesn't represent a threat if certain issues are addressed; it's not that a white person couldn't do this, they can study, they can prepare themselves (...) One time a patient — when the consultation was over — told me: "I am very happy to have one of us where you are". For me that was the best thing in the world. I thought, OK, that's it, it was worth studying for seven years."

Black doctors from Brazil against racism in a profession reserved for the white elite
 

loyola llothta

☭☭☭
Joined
Apr 17, 2014
Messages
35,065
Reputation
6,991
Daps
80,027
Reppin
BaBylon
Russia Soon to Allow Haitians to Travel Without Visa, says Foreign Minister

Sunday, August 25, 2019

Foreign Minister Edmond Bocchit said a memorandum of understanding is in the works with Russia to allow Haitian citizens to travel to the country and Russian citizens to travel to Haiti without a visa requirement.

Minister Bocchit briefed the newspaper, Le Nouvelliste, on this project after headlines were made by the Pitit Dessalines leader, Jean-Charles Moise, who met with the Russian Ambassador to Venezuela, Vladimir Fedorovich Zaimsky, in Haiti.

Former Senator Moise made a 2-week visit to Caracas, Venezuela where he met with many leftist parties from nations such as Cuba, Mexico, Spain, Germany, Venezuela and Russia. Those visits, his subsequent visit by the Russian ambassador, and Mr. Moise's criticisms that the Jovenel Moise administration had turned its back on Venezuela and Russia, which was widely publicized, prompted two articles in Le Nouvelliste.


Minister Bocchit in his interview said the Russian ambassador met with him as well.


The ambassador was received at the Haitian Chancellery by the Minister of Foreign Affairs. During the interview, which lasted more than an hour, the two men discussed relations between the two countries and the upcoming signing of a visa waiver agreement for Haitian and Russian citizens, the minister told the paper.

.......

Likely Not Welcomed News in Washington, D.C.

Diplomatic relations between Haiti and Russia have always been desired but much frowned upon by the United States and nations in the Organization of American States (OAS) with no other choice but to walk in lockstep with the U.S. agenda.

The former dictator, Francois Duvalier and his son Jean-Claude, were allowed their brutal reign in Haiti as long as they opposed the former communist regime of the U.S.S.R.

Russia hasn't been communist for nearly three decades but it wasn't that long ago that the U.S. Embassy in Haiti engaged vigorously to prevent Haiti from joining the PetroCaribe agreement with Venezuela.

Such an agreement between Haiti and Russia would prove a significant separation between Russian President Vladimir Putin and U.S. President Donald Trump who are usually said to see things eye-to-eye. The Trump administration has pushed forward a highly restrictive travel policy against non-European nations.

link:
Russia Soon to Allow Haitians to Travel Without Visa, says Foreign Minister
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,154
Reputation
10,624
Daps
121,954
Down with French imperialism! Independence for Guiana!

guiana_francesa-1024x585.jpg


August 27 2019

The discussion surrounding the destruction of the Amazon called into question by imperialist countries due to fascist Jair Bolsonaro and his criminal policy of destroying natural resources, particularly in the Amazon, to the benefit of land grabbing and mining, posed a possibility of foreign intervention in the vast Brazilian territory composed by the Amazon region.

One of the biggest enthusiasts of this intervention is French president Emmanuel Macron, who said “our house is on fire” and “the Amazon is our common good”, and at the G7 meeting he even said the great powers should be getting mobilized. These statements about the supposed concern for the destruction of the Amazon bring to light other discussions about colonialism.

France has a huge territory in South America, which is a French state, known as French Guiana. French Guiana is the only non-independent political unit in South America and until recently was considered a French colony.

In the early 19th century, there was some economic development and a certain prosperity due to agricultural and mining exploitation and the African slave trade, which stagnates with the abolition of slavery and the transformation of the French Guiana colony into a penal colony. From 1852 to 1946 it is estimated that approximately hundreds of thousands of people were convicted for a variety of reasons: from ordinary criminals to political enemies during the period of the French revolution.

The brutality and torture of the penal colonies in French Guiana are well known and have become books, such as Henri Charrière's Papillon, which tells the day-to-day story of Devil's Island's penal colony, which housed more than 80,000 detainees throughout its existence.

Only after World War II in 1946 did French Guiana have its colony status changed and it became a part of French territory. After being considered French territory, the Kourou Space Center was created in the 1960s, housing the French aerospace launch center. Despite being a French territory, it has all the problems of underdeveloped countries and a 20% unemployment rate.

It functions as a French military base within Latin America for intervention in countries opposing the interests of French imperialism. French Guiana is located in a privileged position close to the equator and the mouth of the Amazon river, with military presence capable of carrying out actions in other countries.

These data show that what are the true interests of French imperialism, manifested through Macron, in the Brazilian Amazon. French Guiana, as the only territory that failed to break free from the colonization process, shows French colonialism is in full force today in our continent.

There must be an end to French imperialism in this territory and an end to colonialism.

Down with French imperialism! Independence for Guiana!
 

Yehuda

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Dec 24, 2014
Messages
30,154
Reputation
10,624
Daps
121,954
French Guianese dennounce Macron's hipocrisy

mg_9767-1024x585.jpg


August 29 2019

The Grand Customary Council of Amerindian and Bushinenge (former slaves who freed themselves and formed communities in the forest, similar to quilombolas) Populations of French Guiana issued an official note in which it positions itself regarding the recent imbroglio between French president Emmanuel Macron and Brazilian president Bolsonaro about the burning in the Amazon region. According to the statement, while the press around the world focuses on this issue, many forget that the borders between Guiana, Brazil and Suriname are very recent, and that the forest has been inhabited and cared for by indigenous peoples for millennia, without borders.

The Council drew from memory a statement by then-congressman Jair Bolsonaro, from April 1998 (“[…] the Brazilian cavalry was very incompetent. Competent was the American cavalry that decimated its Indians in the past.”) to accuse the now president of being a “deeply racist character” and guilty of some of the responsibility, making it clear that the fires are actually the work of capitalism, because in Africa the problem is similar: the forest burns and the people and all beings suffer from this destruction.

The statement includes Macron as the target of its blows, dennouncing that while he expresses concern about the destruction of the Brazilian or the Bolivian Amazon, at the same times he gives 360.000 hectares of forest to multinational mining companies in French Guiana, i.e. there is also a French Amazon, being that extractivism is very responsible for the fire.

The organizations states that it refuses to co-sign the statement by French minister Annick Girardin, because there is a lack of commitment to recognize the rights of indigenous peoples and their role in preserving biodiversity. The Council supports the proposal to increase EU funding for the development of the Amazon, but argues that full participation of indigenous peoples in its management must be guaranteed. Even an international fund for the Amazon must be managed directly in the Amazon by indigenous peoples and communities.

According to the statement, when French president Emmanuel Macron speaks of “associating indigenous peoples”, there must be full participation of indigenous peoples in all decisions concerning French Guiana and the Amazon, ensuring the strengthening of the Grand Customary Council as a decision-making body with uncontested means of operation.

French Guianese dennounce Macron's hipocrisy
 
Top