I've actually been thinking about this exact discussion since the Geto Boys thread that had like 30-40 voters. To be quite honest, I tend to ignore threads where I'm not as familiar with artists or I feel like I can't give a relatively unbiased opinion on the definition of classic, and I think many other posters are doing the same as evidenced by the stark difference in the number of votes seen in a Nas, Jay, Tupac thread vs a Too Short/Geto Boys one. The problem lies in the fact that the more popular artists are by nature going to have more fans and critics while polls about other artists who aren't as popular tend to more often attract fans of the music first with far fewer people coming in "to simply vote no". I would imagine that if the same 180 people that voted in the Nas threads voted in the Too Short/Geto Boys threads the results might look a lot different. In addition, the threads are further complicated by the idea that if albums aren't classic then they are automatically trash. I think we all inherently understand that voting "no" doesn't necessarily mean an album isn't good, but to simply take results and say that an album isn't good because it isn't classic is an entirely different thing.
Obviously, at the end of the day albums with less than 80% yes votes are irrelevant from the coliclassic standpoint, but I do believe that having more votes gives a better idea of how The Coli feels about an album as a whole instead of a subset of individuals that may be more likely to vote yes on all an individual's albums simply because they are a fan.
- I can't say that I expect every thread to get 180 votes but somewhere between 75 and 100 would be a lot better than say 40. Not sure how you could MAKE people vote or if it even makes sense to leave threads open for longer to allow more time.