About damn time. The CBC finally sides with Byron Allen on his Supreme Court case.

Cadillac

Veteran
Joined
Oct 17, 2015
Messages
42,427
Reputation
6,236
Daps
140,194
well their doing one thing right, although they only doing this so mfs wont be on their ass. But good news nonetheless
The ADOS movement is real y'all! This is our politics at work! We may not have a polital party, but our politics have to start somewhere and it's starting with ADOS! The ADOS movement has taught me politics is needed for fair business. Word to the wise.
lol these coli non-ados cornballs aint gon like this because their still telling themselves

"ados aint real, its just russian bots" lol
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-559
Daps
15,338
Reppin
WestMidWest
No, it's racist bc they said, "We don't want another Bob Johnson." :mjpls:
shieeeet..if they have proof of this, then Allen could hire any random person walking the street outside the supreme court to represent him right before the hearing starts
While watching the Roland Martin segment on this, the panel was more wishful thinking and hopeful something could be found during discovery VS explaining why his case was an open/shut
 

ultraflexed

Superstar
Joined
Nov 5, 2015
Messages
17,229
Reputation
3,090
Daps
51,395
...another Byron Allen thread...he's the new Kaep. Nikkas don't know shyt about him or his politics, but that he's rich and married to a cac. Has he spoken on Monique or any common problem Black folks face in entertainment industry?

He could use racially charged words toward Obama and Sharpton, now Black folks suppose to rally around him cause he's making civil rights allegations? smh



:stopitslime: it's racial discrimination cause they don't want his station...how about the discrepancy in advertising spent for popular Black radio/TV programming that has been an issue for years

He's been apart of the entertainment industry for years, did he speak on it? Rev. Al have. Matter of fact, his radio show segments on it is how I learned about the problem, when my pops had it on when he use to drive me around

stop allowing self serving mofos to use Black plight for a comeup using idenitity politics

Sorry breh, but you dont know enough.

This is not about byron Allen, this is about the doors being closed on #ADOS so they'll be no more byron allens.

This lawsuit is about a discrimination law was made right after slavery in 1866. Meaning that you only have to prove that racism was a factor in a non-effective business deal or bad business practices

This law was made to keep whites, from excluding blacks from participating in business deals, or being low balled due to racism.

So this case is much bigger then Allen himself.


Of course with 1oz of research you could found out this information but you would rather be ignorant and falsely storm through on your high horse witch you've just been swiftly knocked off of.
 
Last edited:

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
48,937
Reputation
-2,558
Daps
235,521
CBC blasts Trump’s DOJ/Comcast for attacking Black people’s civil rights in Supreme Court
TheGrioAugust 22, 2019
allencomcast-1024x565.jpg

Byron Allen (L), Comcast offices (Getty Images)

The lawsuit between Byron Allen and Comcast Corp., has drawn the attention of at least one major African American organization as the case heads to the Supreme Court

A case headed to the U.S. Supreme Court that could have a tremendously negative impact on the Black community’s civil rights as it pertains to fair play in contracting and other measures is beginning to capture attention.

Nearly a week after the Justice Department filed an amicus brief in regard to the lawsuit between Entertainment Studios chairman and CEO Byron Allen and Comcast Corp., at least one group has reacted, blasting the Trump administration as the case moves forward.

Allen is suing Comcast Corp. and Charter Communications over racial discrimination after the cable giant refused to include Entertainment Studios programming on their networks. He cites a violation of the Civil Rights Act of 1866, whose section 1981 prohibits racial discrimination in contracts.

All persons within the jurisdiction of the United States shall have the same right in every State and Territory to make and enforce contracts, to sue, be parties, give evidence, and to the full and equal benefit of all laws and proceedings for the security of persons and property as is enjoyed by white citizens, and shall be subject to like punishment, pains, penalties, taxes, licenses, and exactions of every kind, and to no other.

This means the impact of the case could affect civil rights across the board by setting a precedent in which companies will be guided as to whether or not they are subject to the provisions of the statute. If the Justice Department’s brief is favored by the Supreme Court in November, it means the interpretation of the statute could affect the intention of it to protect African American civil rights, which has held for more than 150 years.

READ MORE: Supreme Court to hear Byron Allen’s $20 billion racial discrimination case against Comcast

The controversial brief filed by the DOJ says they want Allen to prove that race was the singular motivating factor in his claim, which he says unfairly misinterprets the statute to his disadvantage.

In an opinion piece published on theGrio.comthis week, Allen called it “perverting a key provision of the law that protects minority businesses at a time when people of color are under heightened attack. All for what Comcast says is in its best financial interest.”

When reached for comment on this unprecedented move by the Trump administration and Comcast to attack the civil rights of African Americans, a spokesperson for the Congressional Black Caucus released a statement to theGrio:

“The Trump Administration has aggressively worked to dismantle policies meant to root out discrimination,” said Gabrielle Brown, Communications Director for the Congressional Black Caucus. “We have long said that as egregious as Donald Trump’s racist words are, his policies are even worse and are doing the most damage to minority communities. Our caucus is committed to continuing aggressive oversight of the Administration to mitigate the impacts of his dangerous and out of touch policies, which include opening the door to discrimination in contracts.”

It is unclear, however, if the CBC will file its own amicus brief in relation to the case.

TheGrio has reached out to several civil rights organizations on the issue including the NAACP, the National Urban League, the Rainbow Push Coalition and Color of Change, but has not heard back.

A representative for the National Action Network said officials with that organization were not available for comment.

BYRON ALLEN: Donald Trump’s Department of Justice and Comcast are Working Together to Destroy a Civil Rights Law in the U.S. Supreme Court


:manny: Say what you want but if it wasn’t for ADOS the CBC would’ve ignored this.


This had nothing to do with ados

Allen is a billionaire and could put all of them out of office real quickly by funding their political opponents and making life in general difficult financially.

They had no choice after the backroom talk

Although it should even take all of that .
 

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
48,937
Reputation
-2,558
Daps
235,521
Sorry breh, but you dont know enough.

This is not about byron Allen, this is about the doors being closed on #ADOS so they'll be no more byron allens.

This lawsuit is about a discrimination law was made right after slavery in 1966. Meaning that you only have to prove that slavery was a factor in a non-effective business deal or bad business practices

This law was made to keep whites, from excluding blacks from participating in business deals, or being low balled due to racism.

So this case is much bigger then Allen himself.


Of course with 1oz of research you could found out this information but you would rather be ignorant and falsely storm through on your high horse witch you've just been swiftly knocked off of.

This has so many ramifications. Well even beyond this case. They could fundamentally freeze blacks out of any executive level bargaining with other companies. Especially a black founder, CEO and COB.

@Isaiah Bradley

You are a anti black agent.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-559
Daps
15,338
Reppin
WestMidWest
Sorry breh, but you dont know enough.
This is not about byron Allen, this is about the doors being closed on #ADOS so they'll be no more byron allens.
This lawsuit is about a discrimination law was made right after slavery in 1966. Meaning that you only have to prove that slavery was a factor in a non-effective business deal or bad business practices
This law was made to keep whites, from excluding blacks from participating in business deals, or being low balled due to racism.
So this case is much bigger then Allen himself.
Of course with 1oz of research you could found out this information but you would rather be ignorant and falsely storm through on your high horse witch you've just been swiftly knocked off of.

I'm on a high horse trying to stop self servers from manipulating Black folks, but what do you call someone capeing using #ADOS for a Blackman married to a cac
I agree this isn't about Allen, this is about feel good rhetoric uising buzz words and flavors of identity politics, not about being consistent/accountable/genuine to ensure Black folks benefit

Making racially charged allegations doesn't help Black folks when you can't prove it
Having a case be heard in the Supreme court doesn't mean you have a legit case
Having no history of addressing commonly known Black plights in the Entertainment industry does make future racial allegations sus
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-559
Daps
15,338
Reppin
WestMidWest
This has so many ramifications. Well even beyond this case. They could fundamentally freeze blacks out of any executive level bargaining with other companies. Especially a black founder, CEO and COB.
@Isaiah Bradley
You are a anti black agent.
...and you're continuing to prove my point of why Black folks need to abandon identity politics
 

ultraflexed

Superstar
Joined
Nov 5, 2015
Messages
17,229
Reputation
3,090
Daps
51,395
I'm on a high horse trying to stop self servers from manipulating Black folks, but what do you call someone capeing using #ADOS for a Blackman married to a cac
I agree this isn't about Allen, this is about feel good rhetoric uising buzz words and flavors of identity politics, not about being consistent/accountable/genuine to ensure Black folks benefit

Making racially charged allegations doesn't help Black folks when you can't prove it
Having a case be heard in the Supreme court doesn't mean you have a legit case
Having no history of addressing commonly known Black plights in the Entertainment industry does make future racial allegations sus

The Civil Rights Act of 1866: An Early Step Towards Equality

We can abandon identity politics when we stop being discriminated against based on our identity. Until white supremacy is deconstruction completely this is the route we have to go. It is what it is
 
Last edited:

BaggerofTea

Veteran
Bushed
Supporter
Joined
Sep 15, 2014
Messages
48,937
Reputation
-2,558
Daps
235,521
...and you're continuing to prove my point of why Black folks need to abandon identity politics

Shut the fukk up. Identity politics are what make groups a cohesive. Blacks practice identity politics the least and we are collectively at the bottom

Whites and asians practice it to their benefit. It's about time we do too.
 
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
9,457
Reputation
-559
Daps
15,338
Reppin
WestMidWest
Shut the fukk up. Identity politics are what make groups a cohesive. Blacks practice identity politics the least and we are collectively at the bottom
Whites and asians practice it to their benefit. It's about time we do too.
lol, that sounds good...but the coli proves that your version of "identity politics" is solely dependent on whatever mood you're in at the moment
Blackness and legitimacy of plight is based on how you feel about that Black person

So because of clowns like you, Black folks need to leave your types to starve by being loyal to only facts so to develop criteria/merits for easy accountability and applying consistently

The Civil Rights Act of 1866: An Early Step Towards Equality
We can abandon identity politics when we stop be discriminated against based on our identity. Until white supremacy is deconstruction completely this is the route we have to go. It is what it is
Again, sounds good but do you have threads talmbowt this particular 1866 act before Allen?
Using terms like white supremacy to cape for a nikka married to a cac further proves my point about identity politics is used to manipulate folks
 
Top