A woman's Logic: "It is misogynistic to not want to have a woman take care of you"

[Shameonyou]

but at the same time a man is supposed to want to be the breadwinner?



these women kill me

 

[flusterose]

but at the same time a man is supposed to want to be the breadwinner?



these women kill me

how does one woman's opinion speak for all women?

 

[semtex]

But you're a loser otherwise

 

[Sierra Mist]

Feminism contradicting itself? lol Why are you at all surprised?

 

[DarlingNikki]

A woman can take care of you in ways that don't involve money.

 

[Shameonyou]

how does one woman's opinion speak for all women?

1. thread title said A woman

2. when I say these women kill me it doesnt equal all women in the universe just most women I come across....

 

[ugksam]

yeah it misogynistic to not want to be in a relationship but then if you are trying to be in a relationship you gotta jump through 2 or 3 hoops to "prove" yourself to the bytch, then being in a relationship basically just means that all your girls problems now get dealt with by you and her instead of just her.

 

[devizelle]

but at the same time a man is supposed to want to be the breadwinner?



these women kill me

Umm can you rephrase your argument? I don't get it.

 

[Shameonyou]

Umm can you rephrase your argument? I don't get it.

basically I was like "any man that gets in a relationship long term must be able to provide for himself, and his girl and not the other way around....I would never allow a woman to take care of me in any shape or form...dont have money, dont date."

shes like, "I think its misogynistic to not want to have a woman take care of you..."

so im like "so you would date a guy that has no money to take you out, no car to drive to your crib, no job?"


shes like "no but still...."

then came the awkward silence when someone knows they are contradicting themselves...

 

[Non Sequitur]

so im like "so you would date a guy that has no money to take you out, no car to drive to your crib, no job?"


shes like "no but still...."

She's lying.

 

[DarlingNikki]

basically I was like "any man that gets in a relationship long term must be able to provide for himself, and his girl and not the other way around....I would never allow a woman to take care of me in any shape or form...dont have money, dont date."

shes like, "I think its misogynistic to not want to have a woman take care of you..."

so im like "so you would date a guy that has no money to take you out, no car to drive to your crib, no job?"


shes like "no but still...."

then came the awkward silence when someone knows they are contradicting themselves...

So what if you get in a relationship with someone and you happen to lose your job and he has to pull the weight for a while, would you leave her because you can't take care of her?

 

[Shameonyou]

So what if you get in a relationship with someone and you happen to lose your job and he has to pull the weight for a while, would you leave her because you can't take care of her?

thats completely different one situation is pre-committment and the other is post committment....

you cant jump into a relationship with nothing to offer but companionship in this society, as a man you should have the mindset that 1. you will have enough to provide for yourself..2. you would have enough to provide for someone else (kid/wife/etc.)


if you have no money and you arent financially stable, you cant expect a woman to be crazy about taking you seriously...

I mean this for serious relationships, not the casual fling.

 

[DarlingNikki]

thats completely different one situation is pre-committment and the other is post committment....

you cant jump into a relationship with nothing to offer but companionship in this society, as a man you should have the mindset that 1. you will have enough to provide for yourself..2. you would have enough to provide for someone else (kid/wife/etc.)


if you have no money and you arent financially stable, you cant expect a woman to be crazy about taking you seriously...

I mean this for serious relationships, not the casual fling.

I see where you're coming from, but the example I used would be the only way I could logically see anyone saying your opinion is misogynistic.

But I think both the man and the woman should have something to offer before jumping in a relationship, so thy can go both ways.

 

[devizelle]

basically I was like "any man that gets in a relationship long term must be able to provide for himself, and his girl and not the other way around....I would never allow a woman to take care of me in any shape or form...dont have money, dont date."

shes like, "I think its misogynistic to not want to have a woman take care of you..."

so im like "so you would date a guy that has no money to take you out, no car to drive to your crib, no job?"


shes like "no but still...."

then came the awkward silence when someone knows they are contradicting themselves...

Hmm. Seems like she didn't really think that out. Maybe she doesn't know what misogynistic means.

 

[SouthernBelle]

Umm can you rephrase your argument? I don't get it.

I second that motion.

edit: nvm