Why did you even make this comparison? You cant see the feet on the woman on the bottom, and you can barely see Zoe's feet. On top of that Zoe is considered by most people to be straight up beautiful, so you cheatin.
The premise of your thread is that you're putting an emphasis on feet, right? So are you sayin that you would choose an average/below average broad, over a chick thats clearly better looking, all because the former chick had "nice feet"? Thats crazy.
I just dont get this whole foot fetish ish. I dont give a goddamn what a chick's feet look like. Why does it matter? Ya'll suckin on these joints, or fckin em or what? Its such an irrelevant part of a chicks body to me, plus they inherently nasty because they always puttin in work, and sweaty n nasty. Whats the appeal? What ya'll care about a chick's kneecaps and elbow game too?