Don't see any issue with the statement. Why should he be forced to make such a rash decision without even knowing the facts of the situation, especially when, supposedly, financial aid for underprivileged children is at stake?
It's easy for y'all to read an article or two and then post some premature opinion about how you hate Barney's, because your decision isn't going to affect anybody. But if it's true that a good portion of the money would go to the underprivileged, then he should have careful consideration in making his decision.
Who knows who is truly at fault here? Is it the NYPD or Barney's?
Also, y'all gotta stop with that "I can't tell he didn't write that " bullshyt. Why can't he be capable enough to write a couple of simply worded paragraphs? Is he not smart enough? Y'all steady perpetuating the "******s can't read or write" stereotypes and don't even realize it.
It's easy for y'all to read an article or two and then post some premature opinion about how you hate Barney's, because your decision isn't going to affect anybody. But if it's true that a good portion of the money would go to the underprivileged, then he should have careful consideration in making his decision.
Who knows who is truly at fault here? Is it the NYPD or Barney's?
Also, y'all gotta stop with that "I can't tell he didn't write that " bullshyt. Why can't he be capable enough to write a couple of simply worded paragraphs? Is he not smart enough? Y'all steady perpetuating the "******s can't read or write" stereotypes and don't even realize it.
Last edited: