Your argument is jumbled nonsense. Your argument that white people are more intelligent stands alone without mentioning "militancy". After all, one could presume white people are more intelligent by simply believing there is institutional racism, as this implies white people have a system of power over blacks, which according to your reasoning could only be the case if white people are naturally smarter than blacks. In your view the only way to deal with this notion is akin to asking people to stop believing in institutional racism. Your argument can further be reduced to, "if a institutional racism system exists, this implies whites are superior, ergo stop believing in institutional racism". So in essence, believing that institutional racism exists has the same "flaw" as your stated "militant afrocentricism", that flaw being the assumption white people are intellectually superior to blacks. And since it is clear that systems of white-privileged and enforced institutionalized racism do exist, and that most people believe this to be the case on some level, then accordingly your supposed flaw which only applies to militant afrocentricism but in this reading actually applies to any reasonable account of racism, also applies to most everyone.
