8 Of The Biggest Myths Propagated About Black American History

Medicate

Old School New School Need To Learn Though
Supporter
Joined
Oct 12, 2014
Messages
8,014
Reputation
1,500
Daps
19,483
Reppin
The Truth
http://atlantablackstar.com/2015/06/01/8-biggest-myths-propagated-black-american-history/

Mansa-Musa--600x450.jpg


1. Black People Were Better Off in America

Many historians have argued that slavery somehow saved many Black people from the primitive “Dark Continent” of Africa. Yet, Africans were succeeding far before European intervention. Black History Month: Debunking the 10 Biggest Myths About Black History, released by thegrio.com in 2012, argues that “we will never know what Africa would have been today without the disruption of slavery and colonization.” Before Europe’s presence on the continent of Africa, dynasties and civilizations characterized by wealth and power could be found throughout the continent. The article continues on to convey that “one cannot begin to put a price tag on what the separation of families, loss of cultural ties and lost wages has cost the black community.”

James-Earl-Ray--600x388.jpg


2. James Earl Ray Killed Martin Luther King Jr.

Children across America have been conditioned to believe that James Earl Ray assassinated Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. Yet, evidence has shown that the FBI and other government agencies could likely be responsible. Records show that the bullet that killed King did not match Ray’s confiscated gun, King’s security guards were told to leave about an hour before the assassination, and the FBI, in 1968, attempted to persuade King to commit suicide in a letter. This notion was better proven when, in 1999, William F. Pepper won the case of The King Family v. Jowers and Other Co-Conspirators. According to a Dec. 9, 1999, New York Times article, the trial concluded that governmental agencies of the United States of America were guilty of the wrongful death and assassination of Dr. Martin Luther King Jr.

George-Washington-Carver-600x338.jpg


3. George Washington Carver Only Invented Peanut Butter

Carver was not merely “The Peanut Doctor.” While he did discover over 100 different uses for the peanut, he was a brilliant botanist, chemist, inventor, scientific researcher and artist. Born during the Civil War, Carver transcended the oppressive social structure to become the first Black student to attend Iowa State University. He was later hired by Booker T. Washington to run the agricultural department at Tuskegee Institute. Under Carver, the department produced pioneering research pertaining to plant biology and helped to maintain financial stability among the sharecroppers in the area. Carver was also a member of the British Royal Society of Arts and an agricultural adviser for President Theodore Roosevelt.

Abraham-Lincoln--600x338.jpg


4. Abraham Lincoln Fought to Free Enslaved Blacks

The notion that President Abraham Lincoln waged the Civil War for the sake of ending slavery has been widely accepted. Yet, the ultimate goal of the war was to preserve the Union, not to emancipate the enslaved Africans of the nation. In fact, during his 1858 debate with Sen. Stephen A. Douglas, Lincoln said the following: “I will say here, while upon this subject, that I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the States where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so. I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and the black races. There is a physical difference between the two, which in my judgment will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong, having the superior position.”

Slave-Auction-in-Virginia--600x312.jpg


5. Slavery Did Not Dehumanize Enslaved Africans

Many historians, as well as filmmakers, have led many to believe that the institution of slavery was not as brutal as one may think. However, this Gone With the Wind fantasy is a fallacy. The very basis of chattel slavery showed that Europeans did not value Black people’s lives and did not treat them as human beings. A 2012 article posted on thegrio.com argues that, “as the master’s property, blacks had no rights under the law, and could be beaten, raped or otherwise abused without recourse.” Furthermore, the overall death toll of slavery confirms that Europeans deemed Black lives as worthless. The late R.J. Rummel, a professor emeritus of political science at the University of Hawaii, conservatively estimated that between 1451 and 1870, 17,267,000 enslaved Africans lost their lives. Various scholars have estimated the death toll was much greater.

Convict-Leasing-System--600x280.jpg


6. Slavery Ended in 1865

Despite the efforts of the Civil War, the release of the Emancipation Proclamation and the addition of the Thirteenth Amendment, slavery, in its literal meaning, didn’t end until well into the 1960s. This is wholly attributed to the fact that the legality of slavery is literally engrained and embedded into the law of the land, the Constitution. Section I of the Thirteenth Amendment reads as follows:Neither slavery nor involuntary servitude, except as a punishment for crime whereof the party shall have been duly convicted, shall exist within the United States, or any place subject to their jurisdiction. The very law that was said to free the slaves was used to re-enslave them. In his book, Slavery by Another Name: The Re-Enslavement of Black Americans from the Civil War to World War II, Douglas A. Blackmon expounds upon the system of convict leasing. Under this system, nearly every Black person charged with a crime, whether a child or an elder, disappeared into the convict leasing system and was subjected to work that was identical to the hard labor that characterized American slavery. Oftentimes, those of the convict leasing system were set up and convicted of crimes they had not committed. Millions of Black people were thrown into the system, and many served lifelong terms.

African-Slavedealer-600x426.jpg


7. Black People Sold Each Other into Slavery

Many state that Africans contributed to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade by selling their own into slavery. Yet, the European manipulation that motivated this act is often left out when the story is told. Others argue that some Africans had no choice but to enslave their own due to European’s control of coercive instruments, such as guns. In addition, an article published bycolorlines.com asserts that “even though African monarchs did collaborate in the selling of Blacks bodies into slavery, what happened after that was the establishment of a heinous and brutal system that rested squarely on the dual pillars of White supremacy and ruthless capitalist greed. There was nothing African-inspired about it.”

Black-Soldiers--600x380.jpg


8. Black People Didn’t Join American Forces Until World War I

Black people have fought in wars since the beginning of American history. In fact, they fought wars as early as the American Revolution. According to a report introduced by the National Park Service, while 5,000 Black soldiers fought in the side of the Americans, 75,000 to 100,000 fled to fight for the British. In addition, the National Archives confirms that roughly 180,000 Black men fought for the Union Army during the Civil War.





 

WaveGang

Superstar
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
15,691
Reputation
3,055
Daps
35,248
Reppin
NULL

7. Black People Sold Each Other into Slavery

Many state that Africans contributed to the Trans-Atlantic Slave Trade by selling their own into slavery. Yet, the European manipulation that motivated this act is often left out when the story is told. Others argue that some Africans had no choice but to enslave their own due to European’s control of coercive instruments, such as guns. In addition, an article published bycolorlines.com asserts that “even though African monarchs did collaborate in the selling of Blacks bodies into slavery, what happened after that was the establishment of a heinous and brutal system that rested squarely on the dual pillars of White supremacy and ruthless capitalist greed. There was nothing African-inspired about it.”

Black-Soldiers--600x380.jpg



The one thing that pisses me off, I would go deeper but imam let this thread breathe.
 

mortuus est

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
41,337
Reputation
3,375
Daps
66,211
very intresting

i didnt lke this
“even though African monarchs did collaborate in the selling of Blacks bodies into slavery,
 

WaveGang

Superstar
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
15,691
Reputation
3,055
Daps
35,248
Reppin
NULL
very intresting

i didnt lke this
“even though African monarchs did collaborate in the selling of Blacks bodies into slavery,

It's basically saying, even though African kingdoms/ tribes sold Africans into slavery. The fact that there were slave ships and a market which were created by Europeans show who set the pillars for such.

But to say African monarchs sold Africans into slavery is the truth as a result of a double lie, in itself. So I agree with you there... could get deeper, I'm just scratching the surface
 

mortuus est

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
41,337
Reputation
3,375
Daps
66,211
It's basically saying, even though African kingdoms/ tribes sold Africans into slavery. The fact that there were slave ships and a market which were created by Europeans show who set the pillars for such.

But to say African monarchs sold Africans into slavery is the truth as a result of a double lie, in itself. So I agree with you there... could get deeper, I'm just scratching the surface

yeah it just makes me a little sad thats all, i know we know we these things in life but it just makes you wonder

i like this thread cause every point you dig deeper into it

i just dont know how we can spread this to the young ones tho, i got 3 younger bros, i want to teach them all this but its a lot of info to take in
 

WaveGang

Superstar
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
15,691
Reputation
3,055
Daps
35,248
Reppin
NULL
yeah it just makes me a little sad thats all, i know we know we these things in life but it just makes you wonder

i like this thread cause every point you dig deeper into it

i just dont know how we can spread this to the young ones tho, i got 3 younger bros, i want to teach them all this but its a lot of info to take in


each one teach one

Yesterday I read up on enuchs (castrated men) and how they would castrate house slaves, dress them in make up and womens clothes so they wouldn't be desirable to their slave masters women. shyts crazy, made me very sad.
 

Primetime21

This my city
Supporter
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
44,377
Reputation
7,346
Daps
168,919
Reppin
Lemongrass, cherries, alkaline water
It's basically saying, even though African kingdoms/ tribes sold Africans into slavery. The fact that there were slave ships and a market which were created by Europeans show who set the pillars for such.

But to say African monarchs sold Africans into slavery is the truth as a result of a double lie, in itself. So I agree with you there... could get deeper, I'm just scratching the surface
Go ahead, go deeper. Thats what this place is for.
 

mortuus est

Veteran
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
41,337
Reputation
3,375
Daps
66,211
each one teach one

Yesterday I read up on enuchs (castrated men) and how they would castrate house slaves, dress them in make up and womens clothes so they wouldn't be desirable to their slave masters women. shyts crazy, made me very sad.
:mjcry:
 

Deluuxe

Deadly Jester
Joined
Apr 13, 2013
Messages
2,112
Reputation
-1,405
Daps
4,769
Reppin
Toronto
Of course they're myths, there's no proof of anything they're saying in the 1st place, On the "Africans", I mean. :mjlol:
 

AJaRuleStan

All Star
Joined
Feb 23, 2015
Messages
2,466
Reputation
-2,575
Daps
5,478
Reppin
Killa Queens
besides number 1 and 7, I agree with everything for the most part. My problem with number 1 is that it's a speculative theory based on nothing concrete that I can see. Africa pre colonization was locked out from all the wealth of information/technologies that was being traded between the European, Asian, and the Middle eastern worlds because geography and the climate of the country made trading with outside countries difficult which caused the country to be technologically inferior to it's neighbors. The reasons made in summary of 1 makes no attempt to explain how African societies are suppose to catapult to the technological level of Europe countries with this glaring issue.
 

BmoreGorilla

Veteran
Joined
Sep 17, 2014
Messages
38,796
Reputation
30,285
Daps
251,587
Reppin
Man, woman, and child
each one teach one

Yesterday I read up on enuchs (castrated men) and how they would castrate house slaves, dress them in make up and womens clothes so they wouldn't be desirable to their slave masters women. shyts crazy, made me very sad.
Whats even sadder about this is that many of them were the master's kids
 

How Sway?

Great Value Man
Supporter
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
24,664
Reputation
3,849
Daps
80,133
Reppin
NULL
besides number 1 and 7, I agree with everything for the most part. My problem with number 1 is that it's a speculative theory based on nothing concrete that I can see. Africa pre colonization was locked out from all the wealth of information/technologies that was being traded between the European, Asian, and the Middle eastern worlds because geography and the climate of the country made trading with outside countries difficult which caused the country to be technologically inferior to it's neighbors. The reasons made in summary of 1 makes no attempt to explain how African societies are suppose to catapult to the technological level of Europe countries with this glaring issue.
:snoop:
 

WaveGang

Superstar
Joined
Jun 26, 2013
Messages
15,691
Reputation
3,055
Daps
35,248
Reppin
NULL
Go ahead, go deeper. Thats what this place is for.

To say African monarchs sold Africans into slavery is the truth as a result of a double lie is a correct statement because, the Europeans had conquered South America at the time they came to Africa. They were able to steal gold from South America and thus crashed the price of gold by flooding the market. Which left many African Kingdoms broke because they couldn't sell their most exported goods. This forced many Kingdoms/Tribes to join the slave trade. On top of that the Europeans would provide a rival tribe with guns, and instigate wars with other tribes. While also funding the other side with guns, which created a massive boom of warring tribes and prisons of war.

The whole notion of Africans sold Africans is to exempt the European of blame.

People don't know shyt about African history, but can say Africans sold Africans. :/
 

How Sway?

Great Value Man
Supporter
Joined
Nov 10, 2012
Messages
24,664
Reputation
3,849
Daps
80,133
Reppin
NULL
To say African monarchs sold Africans into slavery is the truth as a result of a double lie is a correct statement because, the Europeans had conquered South America at the time they came to Africa. They were able to steal gold from South America and thus crashed the price of gold by flooding the market. Which left many African Kingdoms broke because they couldn't sell their most exported goods. This forced many Kingdoms/Tribes to join the slave trade. On top of that the Europeans would provide a rival tribe with guns, and instigate wars with other tribes. While also funding the other side with guns, which created a massive boom of warring tribes and prisons of war.

The whole notion of Africans sold Africans is to exempt the European of blame.

People don't know shyt about African history, but can say Africans sold Africans. :/
:ohhh:
 

Primetime21

This my city
Supporter
Joined
May 9, 2012
Messages
44,377
Reputation
7,346
Daps
168,919
Reppin
Lemongrass, cherries, alkaline water
To say African monarchs sold Africans into slavery is the truth as a result of a double lie is a correct statement because, the Europeans had conquered South America at the time they came to Africa. They were able to steal gold from South America and thus crashed the price of gold by flooding the market. Which left many African Kingdoms broke because they couldn't sell their most exported goods. This forced many Kingdoms/Tribes to join the slave trade. On top of that the Europeans would provide a rival tribe with guns, and instigate wars with other tribes. While also funding the other side with guns, which created a massive boom of warring tribes and prisons of war.

The whole notion of Africans sold Africans is to exempt the European of blame.

People don't know shyt about African history but the suddenly became experts to say Africans sold Africans.

I was just reading about this in some text by Sylviane diouf, the book is primarily about African muslims that were enslaved but it goes into the manipulation tactics is used by Europeans in inciting warfare, that definitely goes undiscussed..along with the major differences between the 'slavery' if you will even call it that which was practiced by Africans.
 
Top