74% of call of duty black ops 6 sales were on playstation this year

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
149,736
Reputation
27,069
Daps
503,946
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
So the 15% sales lost on Xbox and 9% on PC basically went to Playstation.

More revenue for Sony without having the marketing rights and increased sales.


But Concord costs 400 million :mjlol:
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
149,736
Reputation
27,069
Daps
503,946
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
This isn’t serious math.

the splits before the acquisition were 50% playstation and 25% PC and Xbox

Xbox down 15% and PC down 9%. And those numbers shifted to Playstation.

It's actually simple math.

And we're talking sales, not necessarily users since everyone figured Xbox sales would decrease with it being on Gamepass. Same with PC.
 

Pressure

#PanthersPosse
Supporter
Joined
Nov 19, 2016
Messages
45,970
Reputation
6,947
Daps
146,461
Reppin
CookoutGang
the splits before the acquisition were 50% playstation and 25% PC and Xbox

Xbox down 15% and PC down 9%. And those numbers shifted to Playstation.

It's actually simple math.

And we're talking sales, not necessarily users since everyone figured Xbox sales would decrease with it being on Gamepass. Same with PC.
You’re missing the point where Xbox now owns call of duty. :jbhmm:

Also, you’re making the assumption that the only players are only players who purchased the game instead of gamepass.

You’re right, it’s simple math, you just weren’t being serious. :mjlol:
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
149,736
Reputation
27,069
Daps
503,946
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
You’re missing the point where Xbox now owns call of duty. :jbhmm:
no I'm not. i said strictly game sales. they get more revenue now since they get the 70% instead of 30% now, so it's still a win. But now they are footing the bill to pay for the development and marketing so you don't just get to keep the 30% like before. But still a net positive.
Also, you’re making the assumption that the only players are only players who purchased the game instead of gamepass.

You’re right, it’s simple math, you just weren’t being serious. :mjlol:

I already said GP accounts on PC and Xbox account for the loss in retail sales. Did you just skip over that part?
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
49,587
Reputation
12,845
Daps
127,929
no I'm not. i said strictly game sales. they get more revenue now since they get the 70% instead of 30% now, so it's still a win. But now they are footing the bill to pay for the development and marketing so you don't just get to keep the 30% like before. But still a net positive.


I already said GP accounts on PC and Xbox account for the loss in retail sales. Did you just skip over that part?
They are getting 100 percent more of PlayStation sales because they weren't getting any at all before they bought ABK. That's a HUGE number for 1 game, in the ABK catalog.

They also now get 70 percent instead of 30 percent on sales on Xbox, and 100 percent more on whatever other platform the game is available on.

On top of that it makes Gamepass more attractive, and some news subs will stick around which could net far over a 1 time sale.


It's literally all positives.
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
149,736
Reputation
27,069
Daps
503,946
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
They are getting 100 percent more of PlayStation sales because they weren't getting any at all before they bought ABK. That's a HUGE number for 1 game, in the ABK catalog.

They also now get 70 percent instead of 30 percent on sales on Xbox, and 100 percent more on whatever other platform the game is available on.

On top of that it makes Gamepass more attractive, and some news subs will stick around which could net far over a 1 time sale.


It's literally all positives.
I said all of this. Yes they have to pay for development and were going to suffer a loss in retail sales due to Gamepass, but I said and quote "it's still a net positive" because they are getting the 70% cut now.

Yall fussing to fuss.

I thought it would honestly be less than 10% of sale on Xbox due to Gamepass. shocked it was still 10%.

Actually worked out good for both parties as crazy as that sounds.
 

The Mad Titan

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 27, 2012
Messages
49,587
Reputation
12,845
Daps
127,929
They have to pay for development, marketing, and server upkeep, its not free money
I said all of this. Yes they have to pay for development and were going to suffer a loss in retail sales due to Gamepass, but I said and quote "it's still a net positive" because they are getting the 70% cut now.

Yall fussing to fuss.

I thought it would honestly be less than 10% of sale on Xbox due to Gamepass. shocked it was still 10%.

Actually worked out good for both parties as crazy as that sounds.
The stuff MS has to pay for now development wise has always been part of development cost, if anything some of that cost goes down based on the new resources ABK should have on hand.


And I agree it's a win for everyone all around...which is exactly what Microsoft said it would be.

The crazy thing is it could have been WAY better for Sony if Jim had took the original deal offered.
 

Instant Classic

All Star
Supporter
Joined
May 31, 2022
Messages
3,833
Reputation
384
Daps
9,485
Isn't this just UK sales?

The key for xbox and pc gamepass is how many of the users retain their subs and if it influenced them to buy a battle pass and other mtx.
 

daze23

Siempre Fresco
Joined
Jun 25, 2012
Messages
32,051
Reputation
2,703
Daps
44,201
Isn't this just UK sales?

The key for xbox and pc gamepass is how many of the users retain their subs and if it influenced them to buy a battle pass and other mtx.
yeah, I think they said awhile back that most of COD's revenue comes from microtransactions
 

Rekkapryde

GT, LWO, 49ERS, BRAVES, HAWKS, N4O...yeah UMAD!
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
149,736
Reputation
27,069
Daps
503,946
Reppin
TYRONE GA!
The stuff MS has to pay for now development wise has always been part of development cost, if anything some of that cost goes down based on the new resources ABK should have on hand.
You didn't have to pay dev costs when it was Activision Blizz. Your 30% was all yours. Out of that 70% they get now from other platforms, you gotta pay for a game that costs 200 milll to make before marketing. But yes it's still a net positive pretty easy with the amount of sales it produces.
And I agree it's a win for everyone all around...which is exactly what Microsoft said it would be.

The crazy thing is it could have been WAY better for Sony if Jim had took the original deal offered.

This deal might be better. Don't think Sony saw getting that much of a spike in the retail sales
 
Top