50 Cent to Paris Jackson: "does anyone care about how the little boys butts feel?

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

The drawing of October 1993 was accompanied by notes in an adult’s handwriting. The drawing was made by the same adult.

The description made a couple of assumptions. The first one was that the accused was circumcised. The second one was that his manhood had a depigmentation patch on it associated with autoimmune disorder vitiligo.

Interestingly, the accused had been encouraged by his talent manager Sandy Gallin in November 1992 to disclose to the public his years-long struggle with the disorder, which had by now become very advanced. An interview was arranged with Oprah Winfrey, who had been recommended to the accused by Sandy’s friend David Geffen. Incidentally, it was Geffen who had introduced Sandy to the accused and encouraged the accused to hire him as his talent manager a few years earlier. The interview took place in February 1993 at the home of the accused.

Photographs were taken of the accused’s manhood in November 1993 by the police after an incident was alleged to have happened in May 1993. Both features the child was said to have described were incorrect. Michael was uncircumcised. There were discolourations, but none matched the description given of just one discoloration. There were a number of other distinctive features, none of which were mentioned in the description.

Also, it is far from clear as to whose the statement attributed to the child actually was. Circumstantial evidence points to intent to extort the accused. The child’s initial statement was that no alleged act happened. It was only after he spent some time with his father that the child agreed to align his own statement with his father's accusations. Once the settlement money was received by the Chandlers from the accused’s insurance company in January 1994, neither the child nor the father were interested in pursuing criminal prosecution, even though the terms of the settlement explicitly did not require them to abandon the prosecution route. The child’s father had wanted all of the settlement money to himself. It was the accused who insisted that, if a settlement was to be paid, it would be placed on trust for the benefit of the child until he was of certain age of maturity. So the father received a great deal less than he had been pitching for since May 1993.

we're debating the omission of accuracy, not the inclusion of accuracies, of a pop-star's penis?

Really my dude?

Thats like telling your girlfriend: "Look who I WASNT texting...you can't pay attention to who you saw me texting!"

 

[Dynamite James]

And it wasnt like jacko wasnt drugged out day after day dancing on cars in pajamas n shyt.... Mark G interviews n shyt pure circus


With his antics it was almost like he was resigning to thje fact that he would be found guilty; I recall no one really thinking he beats all those charges....funny how we rewrite history these days

Nope. They WANTED him to be guilty. As the trial went on they barely reported what actually happened in the courtroom

 

[Carlton Banks]

As u see today when it comes to that pedo shyt, its a secret society protecting those guys.....Jacko with all we know checked out at the right time.......

Jacko couldnt survive the hs internet age......he was making calls to preteen boys at 3 am everyday talking about masturabtion n such from his house phone n shyt

Breh was faxing love letters to these boys ... Like breh, where the bytches at????

 

[Azul]

You deflecting


You know damn well the guy that walked into court having to be helped by his buddies; knew damn well he was a guilty man and had some years on his head frfr...Like I said no one thought he'd beat all the charges, no one......

You said you watched the trial every damn day...those are your words. Which isn't true. You just got called out on it, then you flipped the script. I actually threw you a bit of a bone mentioning the E show

 

[Skip b]

I asked this question a million times and no one answer it ever

WHAT EVIDENCE WAS THE FEDS SUPPOSED TO FIND?

This, outside of tapes or Jacko being caught red handed with a dikk in a lil boys ass as he openly slept with boys, what were they supposed to find proving him guilt....when alarms, secret passages,, psuedo pedo porn, phone calls, midgets(attraction to lil people) and yall still defend jacko

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

Do you think a victim a boy victim is trying to visualize every detail about the mans penis who abused them........really

Shut yo stupid ass up. LMAOOOOO

So you didn't read the article that was posted i see.

I care whether or not he committed a crime.
He didn't and not even the most seasoned investigators can find any evidence to the contrary.
Any evidence that has been presented is either hearsay or has been debunked.
If you're still mad at Michael knowing that, you're just a hater on his dikk.

@Dynamite James

 

[Dynamite James]

we're debating the omission of accuracy, not the inclusion of accuracies, of a pop-star's penis?

Really my dude?

Thats like telling your girlfriend: "Look who I WASNT texting...you can't pay attention to who you saw me texting!"

Fakkit don't talk to me until you know what the fukk you're talking about.

 

[Skip b]

You said you watched the trial every damn day...those are your words. Which isn't true. You just got called out on it, then you flipped the script. I actually threw you a bit of a bone mentioning the E show

Yall and yall pedo defending semantics could suck my dikk

 

[Azul]

Breh was faxing love letters to these boys ... Like breh, where the bytches at????

Taj posted the many notes and faxes he sent to him. MJ sent notes and faxes to a lot of people. Strange, but this does not denote criminal behavior. As far as "bytches" they were around but you probably wouldn't believe that anyway so what's the point?

 

[Carlton Banks]

pre app recording age....kids vs Michaels and kids words are taken with a grain of salt on stand as is.........


Jacko settled with that particular boy for 22 milly:

That's the craziest shyt. $22 million?! And you didn't do it??? FOH!

 

[Azul]

Yall and yall pedo defending semantics could suck my dikk

Semantics?

Hold this L, bytch.

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

I dont know if you noticed but...
Michael wasn't normal.
Never was at any point of his life.
He didn't do anything wrong.
I don't know why it's so hard to accept that.

EDIT:
Wait. Yes I do.
It's because we are so sexualized as a society that we can't fathom an adult who actually loves children without bringing it to a sexual conclusion in our minds.
So even though nothing sexual happened your mind is wired to think that all close interpersonal interaction must culminate in sex.
When it doesn't, you're thrown off and cannot resolve yourself to the different outcome.

yeah, fukking kids isn't normal.

the rest of the family did quite well, so what's MJ's excuse?

Oh, and how come he never slept with the "mother" of his "children?"

 

[☑︎#VoteDemocrat]

This is an EARTH Shattering Argument!!! If only the prosecution presented this evidence to the courts maybe they could have gotten a conviction.

I've already told you that victims lie to protect their abusers IN COURT all the time. I have first hand experience of this as a juror and countless other cases my friends who are attorneys have relayed to me.

You keep wanting to play games.

Mind you, there are legitimate examples of false accusations... this doesn't seem to be one of them.

 

[Azul]

That's the craziest shyt. $22 million?! And you didn't do it??? FOH!

The crazy shyt is that this has been explained NUMEROUS times dude. NUMEROUS and nikkas still bring it up like it is the smoking gun.

One clown is ignoring my very valid and relevant question and another is mad because he got called out on a blatant lie

 

[KodeBlue]

Do your receipts prove jacko is not guilty.....with his full history...

You didn't read the links?


What full history are you talking about?