Things that are not making sense from a legal standpoint (I understand that all states are different and jurisdictions, but some things remain the same if not similar).
1. He gives out the name and image of his son. When it comes to sex crimes, during an investigation, it is highly suggested under age victims have their information kept private. Reasons for this vary but over all, it's for safety and protection.
2. A rape kit can be done anytime on a child regardless of when the attack took place. A rape kit can be done any time on an adult as well even if evidence was potentially washed away. A simple Google search can pull up numerous articles of children as young as three months getting raped kits when there has been an accusation.
3. Children can in fact sit on the stand as a witness. A lawyer can call a child who can speak and who is well aware of a situation and with the parents consent, to the stand in a court hearing.
4. He speaks openly about an ongoing investigation when lawyers and detectives often ask for disclosure from both sides. This man could get sued for slander himself.
5. No one has been charged with a crime yet he asked for money and aims to manipulate public that all those he named in the article are bad...again slander.