30% of US Population is unemployed.

[TLR Is Mental Poison]

Obama supporters are mad and love to come into threads that threaten their love of him.

btw...how is that sucky thread about Florida Bugs going for you?

What does Obama have to do with the boomers hitting retirement age?

 

[GetInTheTruck]

counting retirees is pretty stupid, and I'm not the biggest Obama fan.

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

Again this thread proves why higher learning is anything but. Another thought provoking thread ruined by dikk sucking Obama trolls. Its disgusting. For those who are interested in the REAL employment numbers in the United States, and not the fake government figures that are "adjusted" every few weeks, check out:

Shadow Government Statistics - Home Page

Excellent site that actually reports real unemployment numbers and not doctored numbers reported by the government. The reality is the true unemployment rate is actually closer to 30% as the TS stated, so it is a real problem that needs to be addressed.

Again, this subforum has turned to shyt.

 

[mastermind]

what an awful thread

 

[Berniewood Hogan]

Again this thread proves why higher learning is anything but. Another thought provoking thread ruined by dikk sucking Obama trolls. Its disgusting. For those who are interested in the REAL employment numbers in the United States, and not the fake government figures that are "adjusted" every few weeks, check out:

Shadow Government Statistics - Home Page

Excellent site that actually reports real unemployment numbers and not doctored numbers reported by the government. The reality is the true unemployment rate is actually closer to 30% as the TS stated, so it is a real problem that needs to be addressed.

Again, this subforum has turned to shyt.

OKAY BROTHER, SINCE YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THE SUBFORUM LIVING UP TO ITS NAMESAKE, LET THE HULKSTER HEAR SOME ACTUAL DETAILS ABOUT THE SOURCE YOU'RE REPPING, BROTHER! THE CNSNEWS LINK IN THE OP IS AN ADMITTED RIGHT WING GOP SHILL SITE, JACK! THEY ALMOST BRAG ABOUT THAT FACT, MEAN GENE! SO TELL US, TOUGH GUY, HOW CAN YOU DEMONSTRATE THE CREDIBILITY OF THIS SHADOWSTATS SITE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, BROTHER? HOW DO YOU GAUGE ITS ACCURACY VERSUS THE UNSPECIFIED GOVERNMENT STATISTICS YOU'RE COMPLAINING ABOUT, DUDE? SHOW US EXACTLY WHY THAT $175 PER YEAR SUBSCRIPTION WEBSITE ISN'T SIMPLY A FLEECING OF IGNORANT AND PERHAPS DESPERATE SMALL FISH INVESTORS, CHAMP!

 

[Resident Geordie]

Don't be fooled: 7.7% is likely a short-lived low in the US unemployment rate

More than five years into the downturn, it doesn't take much to get people excited about the state of the economy. The Labor Department's February employment report showing the economy generated a better than expected 236,000 jobs and the unemployment rate had fallen 0.2 percentage points to 7.7% was sufficient to get the optimists' blood flowing. Unfortunately, they are likely to be disappointed.

First off, if the 236,000 jobs number sounds good to you, then you probably are not old enough to remember the 271,000 number reported last February, or the 311,000 number reported in January of 2012. The strong winter job growth in 2011-2012 was followed by a dismal spring, in which job growth slowed to a trickle.

While most economic measures implied that the economy had suddenly shifted from hot to cold, the more obvious explanation was that unusually good winter weather in the US northeast and the midwest had pulled hiring forward, as some of us warned at the time. This is likely part of the story this year, as well.

While few people in the northern part of the country have been sunbathing in January and February, we did not see the sort of severe snowstorms or sub-zero weather that typically leads to a few days without work in at least part of the region. This likely explains the 48,000 job growth reported for construction in February, as well as higher than expected growth in retail and temporary employment.

The drop in the unemployment rate is also not as good news as it may initially seem. The Labor Department reported that 130,000 people left the labor force during the month – so they are no longer counted as unemployed. The percentage of the adult population that is employed (the employment-to-population ratio, or EPOP) was unchanged at 58.6%. This is just 0.4 percentage points above the low hit in the summer of 2011; and it is unchanged over the last year.

While the unemployment rate has fallen back by 2.3 percentage points from its peak, reversing more than 40% of its increase, the EPOP is still down by 4.5 percentage points from its pre-recession level. The drop in unemployment is much more the result of people giving up the search for employment and leaving the labor force, than it is of workers finding new jobs.

The one genuinely encouraging piece of news in the February employment data is an uptick in wage growth. Over the last three months, average hourly earnings rose at a 2.85% annual rate, compared to the prior three months. If this continues, it would imply that workers are actually seeing real wage gains. Unfortunately, this increase was likely driven by some state minimum wage hikes, and by the sort of random movements that causes these data to fluctuate erratically. But this is an item that the optimists can look to for hope.

Looking beyond this report, though, there is not much reason for optimism. Housing construction is rising, but from a very low base. It had fallen back to just 2.0% of GDP, so even a 20% growth rate would add just 0.4 percentage points to GDP growth. The most recent data on investment shows a sharp drop, albeit after three months of good growth. We will be fortunate if this category grows at more than a 10% annual rate in 2013.

While an upward revision to the fourth quarter GDP data turned a negative 0.1% into a positive 0.1%, the economy still only grew at a 1.6% annual rate in the second half of 2012. Apart from the uptick in construction, there are few good reasons to expect much of an acceleration from this growth rate. And contrary-wise, the ending of the payroll tax cut will pull more than $100bn a year out of the economy. The impact of this tax increase was just being felt when the February jobs survey was taken in the middle of the month.

The other big hit to the economy will be from the sequester, which will pull roughly $80bn in federal spending out of the economy. The forecasts from the Congressional Budget Office and others show the sequester slowing growth by 0.5-0.6 percentage points. The economy has not even begun to feel the impact of these cuts, most of which will not start to make their effects felt until April.

In short, we have an economy that had been growing at a not-very-healthy pace through the second half of 2012 – and which is virtually certain to be slowed by contractionary fiscal policy through the rest of 2013. Unless there is a rapid reversal of policy, the 7.7% unemployment rate is likely to represent a low we may not see again for some time.

While the economy is not likely to fall into a recession and send the unemployment rate soaring, the economy is not growing fast enough to meet the need for jobs from a growing labor force. As a result, unemployment will be going in the wrong direction for the rest of the year.

Don't be fooled: 7.7% is likely a short-lived low in the US unemployment rate | Dean Baker | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

 

[Enzo]

Lmao


All of a sudden, you want to change the rules and metrics when a black guy is in office.

 

[thekingsmen]

What does Obama have to do with the boomers hitting retirement age?

You keep bringin up baby boomers as if they are the only ones mentioned in these stats.

 

[thekingsmen]

Lmao


All of a sudden, you want to change the rules and metrics when a black guy is in office.

Got to love the cop out comment. You wanted change you got it. Bush was no better and neither is the man in the office now.

 

[superunknown23]

Lmao


All of a sudden, you want to change the rules and metrics when a black guy is in office.

Like I said, if Romney was president right now republicans would be dancing and gloating about these numbers.
Question: when was the last time teabaggers actually believed the unemployment numbers?

 

[Enzo]

Dog. I don't care who is in office. Me and mine are gonna succeed and pay it forward. I've been helping folks get interviews and gigs and people have helped me get money and we just gotta keep working and keep winning. We politic ourselves! Bush, Obama, Clinton. It's a whole market you're talking about and that is determined by more than any one man.

 

[thekingsmen]

OKAY BROTHER, SINCE YOU'RE CONCERNED ABOUT THE SUBFORUM LIVING UP TO ITS NAMESAKE, LET THE HULKSTER HEAR SOME ACTUAL DETAILS ABOUT THE SOURCE YOU'RE REPPING, BROTHER! THE CNSNEWS LINK IN THE OP IS AN ADMITTED RIGHT WING GOP SHILL SITE, JACK! THEY ALMOST BRAG ABOUT THAT FACT, MEAN GENE! SO TELL US, TOUGH GUY, HOW CAN YOU DEMONSTRATE THE CREDIBILITY OF THIS SHADOWSTATS SITE YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT, BROTHER? HOW DO YOU GAUGE ITS ACCURACY VERSUS THE UNSPECIFIED GOVERNMENT STATISTICS YOU'RE COMPLAINING ABOUT, DUDE? SHOW US EXACTLY WHY THAT $175 PER YEAR SUBSCRIPTION WEBSITE ISN'T SIMPLY A FLEECING OF IGNORANT AND PERHAPS DESPERATE SMALL FISH INVESTORS, CHAMP!

Got to love when Hogan continues to fail as a poster. I linked the Bureau of Labor under it to prove it so. You failed to look cause your agenda for being a troll poster can't allow you to think correctly.

 

[88m3]

you're still carrying on in here thekingsidiot?

 

[thekingsmen]

you're still carrying on in here thekingsidiot?

Sorry who's thread is it again? Stay off the King's nuts 88.

 

[88m3]

Sorry who's thread is it again? Stay off the King's nuts 88.

I would be angry if I couldn't read just saying



Promotions - Special Offers | Sylvan Learning