Proven decorated solo winner. This is an achievement alluding some of the most popular streamers on earth right now. Please, as a gift from The Truest, take these streezies and make them your own. Ack like, u ain't hear it from me. Act like but when you see me round here you best? Get that Ack right!
🗑️ 3 Years + 11 Studios + 3000 Devs = COD: Modern Warfare II - Warzone 2.0 - DMZ (XBOX, ps, pc) (11/16/22)
- Thread starter SNYC
- Start date
Shamelessly camp in the final circle preferably in a bathroom or prone in some bushes if need be. Be like gas, Be unseen, Be silent be deadly.Came in 7th yesterday
Last edited:
We're gonna have to run a duos soon.
You're freakin hilarious
The Infamous
Superstar
The "skill gap" was in looking up every other day what the latest broken gun was and leveling that up as fast as possible.
Slide canceling and camera breaking wasn't the skill gap breh.
I just think it's weird to equate skill with insanely fast movement, atrocious weapon balancing, absurd amounts of cash everywhere, rushing buy stations, spamming UAV's and kill streaks, heart beat sensors, one shot kills with an incredibly forgiving hit box and aim assist, fire sales exacerbating all the issues inherent with the buy station system, paid skins that gave players an advantage over others, and I'm sure I'm missing a few more things.
I'm not debating whether or not it was fun.
I just disagree with this narrative that 2.0 is catering to "lower skilled players" by removing or at least taking steps to reign in all the things I listed above.
2.0 is forcing you to slow down and strategically move around the map. Sure campers are going to a bit more of an issue (just like they are in PUBG which barely gives you any incentive to move around their map at all) but again, it's something to keep in mind when you're trying to tactical sprint, slide cancel, bunny hop, every freakin corner.
The games are fun. I'm not trying to defend the game as perfect. Again, I just disagree that the game is catering to low skill.
This game caters to the casual/low-skill playerbase. It's not surprising, considering those players make up the majority of COD's fanbase.
The TTK is very fast, especially in close quarter engagements. This helps weaker skilled players. Don't believe me? This is coming from the developers at Infinity Ward:
- Infinity Ward Multiplayer Design Director Joe Cecot
Modern Warfare Time to Kill | Is TTK too fast?
Is Modern Warfare time to kill too fast? Some players believe so, while others say it's no different, but who's actually right? Here's your answer.
www.google.com
The movement and weapon handling is slow and clunky. Aiming down sight, sprint to fire, sliding, mantling, and strafing are all slow.
Another example is the 2v2 gulag. Considering you have to rely on a random teammate, it's considerably more RNG than a 1v1 gulag. It adds randomness that helps weaker players.
Overall, the game plays at a very slow pace with a quick TTK. This helps lower skilled players, as said by Joe Cecot himself.
Last edited:
The Infamous
Superstar
And I'm not saying that WZ1 had a massive skill gap and it was some perfect game. UAV and loadout spam, weapon balancing, lack of visibility (an issue in WZ2 as well), and map layout of Caldera were some of the issues in WZ1 imo.
"The TTK is too fast in Warzone 2.0"This game caters to the casual/low-skill playerbase. It's not surprising, considering those players make up the majority of COD's fanbase.
The TTK is very fast, especially in close quarter engagements. This helps weaker skilled players. Don't believe me? This is coming from the developers at Infinity Ward:
- Infinity Ward Multiplayer Design Director Joe Cecot
Modern Warfare Time to Kill | Is TTK too fast?
Is Modern Warfare time to kill too fast? Some players believe so, while others say it's no different, but who's actually right? Here's your answer.
The movement and weapon handling is slow and clunky. Aiming down sight, sprint to fire, sliding, mantling, and strafing are all slow.
Another example is the 2v2 gulag. Considering you have to rely on a random teammate, it's considerably more RNG than a 1v1 gulag. It adds randomness that helps weaker players.
Overall, the game plays at a very slow pace with a quick TTK. This helps lower skilled players, as said by Joe Cecot himself.
"Why can't I kill people with a single shot with my sniper rifle in Warzone 2.0?"
The Infamous
Superstar
"The TTK is too fast in Warzone 2.0"
"Why can't I kill people with a single shot with my sniper rifle in Warzone 2.0?"
I'm assuming you're trolling with this post
This has almost nothing to do with my post breh
It has to do with one of your complaints.I'm assuming you're trolling with this post
This has almost nothing to do with my post breh
You can't have everything both ways breh.
You can't complain about the TTK being too fast and claim that that's there to help lower skilled players but then advocate for one hit kills with snipers and faster ADS speeds.
This game has VERY forgiving aim assist on controller. I'd be more receptive to your point regarding ADS if they removed aim assist altogether.
Right now, it it's current state, 2.0 is more balanced across the board than Caldera/Rebirth Island ever was.
Early to mid Verdansk to me is almost the gold standard.
If you're looking at Caldera and Rebirth Island as the peak of the game you and I just aren't ever going to see eye to eye on this game.
The Infamous
Superstar
When have I ever advocated for one hit sniper kills? It's funny cause I never snipe.
Claim? It's hard to argue when the developers of the damn game have made the same statement:
"Our weapons are a bit more lethal than they were in Black Ops, and that helps the lower skilled player get a kill when they otherwise wouldn't"
Are you trying to say the people who made the game are wrong?
Early to mid Verdansk is definitely peak WZ, no doubt.
Copy Ninja
Superstar
Bruh was hiding in the bathroom crouch walking with a shotgun with the doors all closed
We body both nikkas in the gulag. Maybe i needed 3 to make it fairThis game caters to the casual/low-skill playerbase. It's not surprising, considering those players make up the majority of COD's fanbase.
The TTK is very fast, especially in close quarter engagements. This helps weaker skilled players. Don't believe me? This is coming from the developers at Infinity Ward:
- Infinity Ward Multiplayer Design Director Joe Cecot
Modern Warfare Time to Kill | Is TTK too fast?
Is Modern Warfare time to kill too fast? Some players believe so, while others say it's no different, but who's actually right? Here's your answer.
The movement and weapon handling is slow and clunky. Aiming down sight, sprint to fire, sliding, mantling, and strafing are all slow.
Another example is the 2v2 gulag. Considering you have to rely on a random teammate, it's considerably more RNG than a 1v1 gulag. It adds randomness that helps weaker players.
Overall, the game plays at a very slow pace with a quick TTK. This helps lower skilled players, as said by Joe Cecot himself.
Copy Ninja
Superstar
When have I ever advocated for one hit sniper kills? It's funny cause I never snipe.
Claim? It's hard to argue when the developers of the damn game have made the same statement:
"Our weapons are a bit more lethal than they were in Black Ops, and that helps the lower skilled player get a kill when they otherwise wouldn't"
Are you trying to say the people who made the game are wrong?
Early to mid Verdansk is definitely peak WZ, no doubt.
The Grau and Kilo metas were peak Warzone.
They put shooting while in the air back in the game
at every post you disagree with. How about you actually write a counter to people's arguments. No wonder you have -432 rep