3 College Cacs file racial discrimination against Black professor

Remote

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 29, 2013
Messages
78,968
Reputation
23,791
Daps
358,668
It was a Mass Communication class so I guess they felt the topic wasn't appropriate for the class? But structural racism go hand in hand in mass communication but if you're not impacted by racism it's going to be hard to make the connection.
I see.

But my first thought at the terms "mass communication" and "structural racism" was = Nazi Europe.
Or at the very least, in a post-WW2 world, communist eastern Europe (with regard to how certain ethnicities were treated)

Really shouldn't be that hard for white people to identify or make the connection.
:manny:

To be fair, it was just 3 people who complained. So I couldn't paint everyone the same way.
 

Mr. Pink

All Star
Joined
Jun 14, 2012
Messages
3,050
Reputation
-430
Daps
5,941
A black female professor at Minneapolis Community and Technical College was formally reprimanded by school officials after three of her white male students were upset by a lesson she taught on structural racism.

Shannon Gibney says that the students reacted in a hostile manner to the lesson in her Introduction to Mass Communication class, with one of them asking her, “Why do we have to talk about this in every class? Why do we have to talk about this?”

“His whole demeanor was very defensive. He was taking it personally. I tried to explain, of course, in a reasonable manner — as reasonable as I could given the fact that I was being interrupted and put on the spot in the middle of class — that this is unfortunately the context of 21st century America,” she explained in an interview with City College News.

Gibney says that, after this initial comment, another white male student said, “Yeah, I don’t get this either. It’s like people are trying to say that white men are always the villains, the bad guys. Why do we have to say this?” These students continued to argue and disrupt the lesson until Gibney told them that if they were troubled by her handling of the subject, they could file an official complaint with the school’s legal affairs department.

The students then filed a complaint, and Gibney was formally reprimanded by the school’s vice president of academic affairs for creating a ”hostile learning environment” for trying to educate her students about the existence and operations of structural racism.
advertisement

Based on this and other actions by the school administration, Gibney and six other professors are filing a federal class action lawsuit against the college alleging that it is a discriminatory workplace.
.
Well played.:leon:
 

Rawtid

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
43,323
Reputation
14,608
Daps
119,418
:wtf:

But the black people who say "we were slaves" weren't ever slaves, though. Yeah, they may be feeling the effects of racism today but that doesn't mean THEY were slaves

And why should the white people say "we enslaved blacks" when they don't own slaves today?

You tryna credit black people for being inaccurate and fault white people for being accurate
You're right.

I guess I should say that blacks will always be more impacted by slavery and racism so it's harder or pretty much stupid to disassociate yourself from it just because you've never physically experienced it. If that makes sense.

On the flip side, since white people aren't really impacted by racism, they pretend as if it's a myth or something and it's like they refuse to understand the issue when it pretty much started with them. If you don't acknowledge the beginning, you'll continue to act stupid about the end result.
 

Rawtid

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Jun 23, 2012
Messages
43,323
Reputation
14,608
Daps
119,418
I see.

But my first thought at the terms "mass communication" and "structural racism" was = Nazi Europe.
Or at the very least, in a post-WW2 world, communist eastern Europe (with regard to how certain ethnicities were treated)

Really shouldn't be that hard for white people to identify or make the connection.
:manny:

To be fair, it was just 3 people who complained. So I couldn't paint everyone the same way.
Yeah, the article doesn't give specifics on the lesson but either way those 3 felt "uncomfortable" enough about it to complain. Cacs gon Cacs.
 

No_bammer_weed

✌️ Coli. Wish y’all the best of luck. One
Joined
Jul 19, 2012
Messages
10,227
Reputation
7,795
Daps
57,827
:wtf:

But the black people who say "we were slaves" weren't ever slaves, though. Yeah, they may be feeling the effects of racism today but that doesn't mean THEY were slaves

And why should the white people say "we enslaved blacks" when they don't own slaves today?

You tryna credit black people for being inaccurate and fault white people for being accurate

A little perspective is needed, because you're trying to play agenda semantics here. Saying "we were slaves", as a black person, is entirely accurate because its rhetorical symbolism in a historical context...it establishes "who" was affected as a group or collective. Its no different than when people say WE were attacked on 9/11...does that mean that every single American was attacked on that day? Or how about when people say WE fought for freedom in WW2 as a way to claim credit-by-association for good things done by "Caucasians"?

Now you want to change the rules of American colloquialism and meaning, when the same language that the dominant class uses is used to their disfavor, and specifically to the white american male psyche. White ancestors benefited from the inequities of slavery as an institution, and those who are white Americans today still enjoy the entrenched institutional advantages that linger at the expense of the descendants of slaves. Simultaneously attempting to empower whites through association with the past, and avoiding any guilt-by-assocation for bad acts is, frankly, the height of hypocrisy.
 
Last edited:

WheresWallace

Superstar
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
11,955
Reputation
6,074
Daps
42,648
Reppin
NULL
ku-medium.jpg
 
Top