3/7 Smackdown: the Number 1 contender finally decided

Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
73,308
Reputation
5,752
Daps
174,633
MickieJames3.jpg
real shyt, thats just amazing, is that natural or what kind of exercises did she do to get that? and nutrition
 

Silkk

Thats My Quarterback :to:
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
189,880
Reputation
19,187
Daps
480,307
You'd feel different if you were a lower card bum who otherwise wouldn't have shyt to do around WM season. :ufdup: I don't mind these people getting their money. Let WWE toss these guys a WM bonus. We've got 51 other weeks out of the year and hundreds of hours of TV and special events for them to spotlight specific talent.
I'd rather see memorable moments from midcard acts that propel them into the next level rather than just thrown into a random ass battle royal.
 

jadden

Superstar
Joined
Nov 2, 2014
Messages
9,260
Reputation
540
Daps
29,801
Y'all keep saying Smackdown books the women better, but yet we see all the women fighting in a single match for the title on numerous occasions. How is that any better than Charlotte/Sasha/Becky regularly fighting each other? It's not. Both shows are booked terribly :martin:


Smackdown uses all the women they have. Raw has 7 women on their roster and yet for 6 months it was nothing but Charlotte and Sasha swapping the belt. Only recently did they start to use bayley
 

TheGreatShowtime

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
51,107
Reputation
12,083
Daps
238,530
Reppin
The Swamp
It's why one brand should of kept the tag titles and one had the women... Women division on a whole is pretty stacked.

That sounds good on paper, but it won't work because they clearly don't want to focus on women's wrestling for an extended period of time. They wouldn't be able to focus on Charlotte, Sasha, Becky, Bayley, Alexa & Nikki Bella on one brand. The women should be free to go where they want on both shows & they should have a show similar to 205 Live for just women's wrestling.
 
Top