Dems got to start prepping either Beshar or Walz for 2028. Kamala campaign team shouldn't go nowhere, they did a good job but time to use that effort for 2028 nominees.
No to Walz.
Dems got to start prepping either Beshar or Walz for 2028. Kamala campaign team shouldn't go nowhere, they did a good job but time to use that effort for 2028 nominees.
I have no issues with a woman being elected as president. It's the women that time and time again hit me with this sentiment that women shouldn't lead. Sh*t is crazy, women in that 30-50 demographic don't wanna see a woman be president. Plain and simple.I know retarded people believe that but its been shown women outperform and are less susceptible to corruption. Merkel in germany and that iceland pawg are two prime examples of strengthening their nations.
nikka stuff lmfaoooI know retarded people believe that but its been shown women outperform and are less susceptible to corruption. Merkel in germany and that iceland pawg are two prime examples of strengthening their nations.
fukk outta her with the humble bragging brehbrehs this country is so fukkin cooked. Ironically Trump being president wont have that much of an impact on my life.
Who this is going to fukkin over is low income black people the hardest.
Man next election we better not hear shyt about early polls or about celebrities like Taylor swift or Beyoncé
That clearly means shyt
I have no issues with a woman being elected as president. It's the women that time and time again hit me with this sentiment that women shouldn't lead. Sh*t is crazy, women in that 30-50 demographic don't wanna see a woman be president. Plain and simple.
The only one who'd have a chance is a GOP womanIf we can have women senators and representatives, we can have a woman president. That "they will never vote for a woman" shyt is a cop out. If countries like India and Pakistan can have female leaders then so can we. The issue is the candidates that the Dems are putting out.
Michelle would've had a better shot than KamalaProbably not tbh. It'd be Hillary all over again, just with more Black support.
While I don't disagree with you, her stance/record (she's linked to Joe) on LGBT, immigration, Israel etc sure didn't help her.Don’t run a black woman. Lol at ideologies. It’s not that complicated. Thry rejected a black woman vs a white supremacist. Stop letting people off the hook.
Kamala and Hillary were more centrist candidates. Further left and you're talking things like tuition forgiveness/free tuition, free or cheaper health care, etc. Those are very powerful ideologies and promises that will easily get a person elected.
I still think a non-white guy could pull it off, but he definitely needs to be middle aged, have a family, and be an off-the-cuff shyt talker toward republicans and even OTHER DEMS -- especially on the debate stage.You need a tall white male in his late 40's/early 50's with a wife and kids, who talks shyt like Trump but defend some social programs.
All that fly shyt dems tried in the last 15 years ain't gonna work
Enjoy your fast food job broke ass