I can't speak for every critique of the Republican outreach, but I have been one of the most vocal critics of Harris' decision to make normalization of non-MAGA Republicans a central tenet of her campaign, and my criticisms haven't been based on the electoral validity of the move, they've been based on the ramifications on our political landscape. The vast majority of analysis in this thread treats elections like the end of the path instead of inflection points along the path. Anything to win an election, consequences be damned. Like, most people in this thread would be woefully incapable of critiquing the Third Way triangulation of the 90s Clinton campaigns and the ensuing social harm because "...well he won, didn't he?"
I think it's more that most leftists are concerned with actual governing, ideology and the structural forces that shape our lives and society as opposed to the general public just being obsessed primarily with the electoral spectacle. Winning elections is the only thing that matters to the average Lib voter, they check out and go to brunch once their guy/gal wins.
This is the tenor of concern I'm seeing from a lot of leftist in this environment where Kamala is likely to win, and mirrors my feelings on this election:
I can't speak for every critique of the Republican outreach, but I have been one of the most vocal critics of Harris' decision to make normalization of non-MAGA Republicans a central tenet of her campaign, and my criticisms haven't been based on the electoral validity of the move, they've been based on the ramifications on our political landscape. The vast majority of analysis in this thread treats elections like the end of the path instead of inflection points along the path. Anything to win an election, consequences be damned. Like, most people in this thread would be woefully incapable of critiquing the Third Way triangulation of the 90s Clinton campaigns and the ensuing social harm because "...well he won, didn't he?"
I think it's more that most leftists are concerned with actual governing, ideology and the structural forces that shape our lives and society as opposed to the general public just being obsessed primarily with the electoral spectacle. Winning elections is the only thing that matters to the average Lib voter, they check out and go to brunch once their guy/gal wins.
This is the tenor of concern I'm seeing from a lot of leftist in this environment where Kamala is likely to win, and mirrors my feelings on this election:
b
I can't speak for every critique of the Republican outreach, but I have been one of the most vocal critics of Harris' decision to make normalization of non-MAGA Republicans a central tenet of her campaign, and my criticisms haven't been based on the electoral validity of the move, they've been based on the ramifications on our political landscape. The vast majority of analysis in this thread treats elections like the end of the path instead of inflection points along the path. Anything to win an election, consequences be damned. Like, most people in this thread would be woefully incapable of critiquing the Third Way triangulation of the 90s Clinton campaigns and the ensuing social harm because "...well he won, didn't he?"
I think it's more that most leftists are concerned with actual governing, ideology and the structural forces that shape our lives and society as opposed to the general public just being obsessed primarily with the electoral spectacle. Winning elections is the only thing that matters to the average Lib voter, they check out and go to brunch once their guy/gal wins.
This is the tenor of concern I'm seeing from a lot of leftist in this environment where Kamala is likely to win, and mirrors my feelings on this election:
I find your viewpoint to be respectable and I appreciate the fact that you don't don't feel the need to talk down to others in every post.
You may disagree with this, but I think at the end of the day, most of us in this thread have the same endgoals. We just disagree on how we need to reach those goals.