WHO WINS?


  • Total voters
    310

MAKAVELI25

the heir apparent
Supporter
Joined
Jun 21, 2012
Messages
18,825
Reputation
5,665
Daps
74,726
Reppin
#ByrdGang
I can't speak for every critique of the Republican outreach, but I have been one of the most vocal critics of Harris' decision to make normalization of non-MAGA Republicans a central tenet of her campaign, and my criticisms haven't been based on the electoral validity of the move, they've been based on the ramifications on our political landscape. The vast majority of analysis in this thread treats elections like the end of the path instead of inflection points along the path. Anything to win an election, consequences be damned. Like, most people in this thread would be woefully incapable of critiquing the Third Way triangulation of the 90s Clinton campaigns and the ensuing social harm because "...well he won, didn't he?"


I think it's more that most leftists are concerned with actual governing, ideology and the structural forces that shape our lives and society as opposed to the general public just being obsessed primarily with the electoral spectacle. Winning elections is the only thing that matters to the average Lib voter, they check out and go to brunch once their guy/gal wins.

This is the tenor of concern I'm seeing from a lot of leftist in this environment where Kamala is likely to win, and mirrors my feelings on this election:









I can't speak for every critique of the Republican outreach, but I have been one of the most vocal critics of Harris' decision to make normalization of non-MAGA Republicans a central tenet of her campaign, and my criticisms haven't been based on the electoral validity of the move, they've been based on the ramifications on our political landscape. The vast majority of analysis in this thread treats elections like the end of the path instead of inflection points along the path. Anything to win an election, consequences be damned. Like, most people in this thread would be woefully incapable of critiquing the Third Way triangulation of the 90s Clinton campaigns and the ensuing social harm because "...well he won, didn't he?"


I think it's more that most leftists are concerned with actual governing, ideology and the structural forces that shape our lives and society as opposed to the general public just being obsessed primarily with the electoral spectacle. Winning elections is the only thing that matters to the average Lib voter, they check out and go to brunch once their guy/gal wins.

This is the tenor of concern I'm seeing from a lot of leftist in this environment where Kamala is likely to win, and mirrors my feelings on this election:








b
I can't speak for every critique of the Republican outreach, but I have been one of the most vocal critics of Harris' decision to make normalization of non-MAGA Republicans a central tenet of her campaign, and my criticisms haven't been based on the electoral validity of the move, they've been based on the ramifications on our political landscape. The vast majority of analysis in this thread treats elections like the end of the path instead of inflection points along the path. Anything to win an election, consequences be damned. Like, most people in this thread would be woefully incapable of critiquing the Third Way triangulation of the 90s Clinton campaigns and the ensuing social harm because "...well he won, didn't he?"


I think it's more that most leftists are concerned with actual governing, ideology and the structural forces that shape our lives and society as opposed to the general public just being obsessed primarily with the electoral spectacle. Winning elections is the only thing that matters to the average Lib voter, they check out and go to brunch once their guy/gal wins.

This is the tenor of concern I'm seeing from a lot of leftist in this environment where Kamala is likely to win, and mirrors my feelings on this election:









I find your viewpoint to be respectable and I appreciate the fact that you don't don't feel the need to talk down to others in every post.

You may disagree with this, but I think at the end of the day, most of us in this thread have the same endgoals. We just disagree on how we need to reach those goals.
 

Ozymandeas

Veteran
Joined
Jan 28, 2013
Messages
14,685
Reputation
2,145
Daps
69,939
Reppin
NULL


Yeah it's a wrap

Does this woman sleep :dahell:

Can ya'll imagine Joe old ass (or Trump for that matter) doing all the shyt she been doing. I'm half her age and I don't have the energy to do all this :dead:


I thought the same sh*t. I read in the WSJ yesterday that she’s going to be in NC, GA, PA and MI in the next 24-48 hours. I would’ve been done after Georgia. She has been wearing that plane out for the last two months. Cant nobody say she didn’t give it a real shot.
 

wire28

Blade said what up
Supporter
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
51,372
Reputation
12,087
Daps
190,752
Reppin
#ByrdGang #TheColi
which is ironic, since as a Spaniard, you're the least relevant and credible poster in here :ehh:
I’d say he’s the least credible because somehow his Spanish upbringing led him to believe there was even a 0.1% chance Trump was going to free black people worldwide

But atleast he has the excuse of being a foreigner. I don’t have a good reason to explain why smooth mind is an idiot
 

John Mexico

All Star
Joined
Jun 2, 2012
Messages
5,036
Reputation
258
Daps
10,251
Reppin
Henderson, NV
:dead: i'm wondering what the fukking tradeoff is with the gambling markets

the actual gamblers are the guys you mentioned, crypto bros, etc....but are they really sacrificing money on a bad, emotional bet?
It looks like it.

I'm just mad that I went with the standard bank transfer which took 3 days too long before correcting itself somewhat (Kalshi, I ain't trying to get caught in no funny business in Polymarket)
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
15,207
Reputation
4,453
Daps
42,448
which is ironic, since as a Spaniard, you're the least relevant and credible poster in here :ehh:
Even less credible and relevant than the people who were saying Biden should have stayed in the race because his clear and obvious cognitive fukkups were all made up by the mainstream media out to get him?

Even less credible and relevant than the people who were saying Kamala would get blown out because a black woman could never win the election?

Even less credible and relevant than the people who were saying we're doomed because whites would never vote for her?

Even less credible and relevant than the people who were saying (insert plain white man here) should replace Biden as the nominee and Kamala should have to settle for being their VP?

Hell, there was a guy in here who had a manic obsession with transgender people and said DeSantis was going to be the next heavy hitter...even less credible and relevant than that dipshyt?

I gotta rethink my whole approach if this is true :sadbron:
 

King Kreole

natural blondie like goku
Joined
Mar 8, 2014
Messages
15,207
Reputation
4,453
Daps
42,448
b

I find your viewpoint to be respectable and I appreciate the fact that you don't don't feel the need to talk down to others in every post.

You may disagree with this, but I think at the end of the day, most of us in this thread have the same endgoals. We just disagree on how we need to reach those goals.
Thanks man. I came at you sideways unnecessarily a while ago on the Gaza issue and I apologize. You're a good-faith poster and I appreciate your perspective. I'm not sure most of us in the thread have the same endgoals, but I think many of us have the same immediate-term goals at least.
 

the cac mamba

Veteran
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
100,614
Reputation
13,406
Daps
294,566
Reppin
NULL
Even less credible and relevant than the people who were saying Biden should have stayed in the race because his clear and obvious cognitive fukkups were all made up by the mainstream media out to get him?

Even less credible and relevant than the people who were saying Kamala would get blown out because a black woman could never win the election?

Even less credible and relevant than the people who were saying we're doomed because whites would never vote for her?

Even less credible and relevant than the people who were saying (insert plain white man here) should replace Biden as the nominee and Kamala should have to settle for being their VP?

Hell, there was a guy in here who had a manic obsession with transgender people and said DeSantis was going to be the next heavy hitter...even less credible and relevant than that dipshyt?

I gotta rethink my whole approach if this is true :sadbron:
yep. less credible than all of that. you don't vote in our elections :mjlol:
 
Top