Do...you...know who Jeffrey Epstein is? Like what his whole deal is?
Yes, I'm aware, which is why I literally said his anti-war projection is less credible now because he had a full term record of also engaging in militarism.
Trump apologia
Yes, I'm aware, which is why I literally said his anti-war projection is less credible now because he had a full term record of also engaging in militarism.
I disagree it is never going to change, I think that's a posture of learned helplessness that is facilitated by the anti-democratic political miseducation both parties benefit from. I don't think the record pertaining to the votes for promoting the Ukraine-Russia war, the votes for promoting Israeli militarism, the votes for the Iraq War, the votes for the War in Afghanistan, Democratic militarism as it relates to drone strikes, etc etc provide a convincing case that Democrats are "fundamentally more anti-war than Republicans". Also Trump spent much of the 2016 Republican Primary and General Election criticizing the Republican Neocon wars of intervention. More than his opponent did. Which is what I mean when I say they ceded the high ground.
Disagree.
From across the pond its reporting as if it could go either way, but looking through the last few pages here, it seems like it'll be a clean sweep for Harris? Is this just bias because there's only a couple of MAGA's on HL (eg. 88m3, Cac mamba etc) or is Harris really going to crush it
Exactly, therefore Trump can't be labeled a fascist.
Well, the thing is that no one really knows what will happen. The election is 50/50 in terms of odds.From across the pond its reporting as if it could go either way, but looking through the last few pages here, it seems like it'll be a clean sweep for Harris? Is this just bias because there's only a couple of MAGA's on HL (eg. 88m3, Cac mamba etc) or is Harris really going to crush it
So you think we should allow Russia to take over Ukraine by withdrawing support?Yes, I'm aware, which is why I literally said his anti-war projection is less credible now because he had a full term record of also engaging in militarism.
Trump apologia
To answer your question, not at this point in the war.
I would never say "clean sweep," but she is almost certainly in a better position than Trump from what we know and has more paths to 270 than he does.From across the pond its reporting as if it could go either way, but looking through the last few pages here, it seems like it'll be a clean sweep for Harris? Is this just bias because there's only a couple of MAGA's on HL (eg. 88m3, Cac mamba etc) or is Harris really going to crush it
I don't think it's up to the United States to unilaterally "allow" or "disallow" this kind of conduct by foreign countries. I believe a democratic body of the international community (aka the UN) should be the ones to hold Russia to account for their illegal invasion of Ukraine. But because the United States has effectively, structurally neutered the UN to the point where international democracy is not a practical reality at this point in time, I believe a diplomatic resolution to this conflict should be prioritized over the current policy of the Military Industrial Complex and the decrepit Cold Warriors currently running US foreign policy being allowed to dump endless arms into Ukraine to stoke the war in pursuit of their fever dream of regime change in Russia.
