Piff Perkins
Veteran
I agree with your assessment of the Dean campaign and also don't find it comparable to the Warren campaign, but I find your assessment of the latter odd. I don't know where you're getting that Warren saw white Republicans as relatable, if anything her electoral problem was being too engrossed in leftist/academic/activist spaces. I think the only hat tip towards bipartisanship was mentioning that her redneck brother is a Republican. I remember folks aligned with the Sanders campaign trying to use the fact that she used to be a registered Republican as an attack, so the campaign definitely didn't lean into that. Biden, Buttigieg, Delaney, Bloomberg were all much more of the bipartisanship candidates. I also don't know what you mean by not releasing her platform during debates...who was dropping platforms live during debates? She timed the drops to give the ecosystem time to promote them and she would reference them during the debates. Which is standard operating procedure for political campaigns. You say she spend zero time trying to appeal to people who thought like her but I feel like it's the complete opposite, she spent the campaign trying to appeal to people like me instead of the general public. Too many plans, not enough vibes.
Yes, the Sanders people tore her apart in an unfair manner. They did that to everyone and frankly I'm glad their bullshyt is largely irrelevant now. It was never really about policy, it was about purity and retribution.
I don't think bipartisanship was her flaw per se. As you said Warren is way too lost in the weeds of academic bullshyt that doesn't have an appeal outside the internet. Another reason there was pushback from a very specific strand of Sanders supporters was that the policies they support - universal healthcare, green new deal, etc - are largely best as abstract ideals people can say they support, without the burden of debating specifics. Once you get into the weeds of HOW you implement programs, it becomes a purity battle between leftists who love nothing more than to get nothing accomplished.
BTW this is a major reason why democrat governors have largely gotten no credit for implementing multiple successful liberal policies on the state level. Walz, Whitmer, etc have pushed through school lunch programs and killed right-to-work status for unions and cut rent by building more housing etc etc. Peopl,e want simple solutions to every day problems in their lives, not policy papers. And these politicians have been rewarded by normal voters - liberals, moderates, even some conservatives. The left doesn't care because their main interest is critiquing power and demanding purity.