Nah, we not gonna bash Howard Dean. As a Warren G, her campaign was terrible because of the fact she saw too many white Republicans as relatable individuals during a Democratic primary. She spent way too much time pleading for them to see things her way, not releasing her platform during debates (instead doing so during “town halls” to create buy-in for the moment), and boxing herself into a candidate for a cabinet position that the elites would never let her close to. Quite honestly, she spent zero time trying to appeal to people who thought like her. That’s how bad her campaign was.
Howard Dean is the opposite: 20 years ago your campaign would sink because you made a weird noise getting over-excited hyping up your crowd. His campaign was groundbreaking. Using the internet, grassroots organizing with small groups, and focused small donor participation. With better overall organization, he would have fared better.
This is the same guy who was pushed out as DNC because even though he was successful at the only part of his plan they let him execute, The 50 state strategy on for the House and Senate. He was a menace that wanted to take it to Republicans on every level: local, state, and national. He wanted to tailor the message to audiences while having the legislation they wanted to pass already ready to go. He wanted to find new, younger candidates to replace the old guard. And all we got was bytching from people who have held on for too long and refuse to pass down institutional knowledge while allowing outsiders to primary young “troublemakers”.
Howard Dean was a visionary as a campaigner who fell victim to the need for news for 24 hour news cycle, and now we see the position the country sits because of it.
Yaaaahhhhh……..