Best" is a comparative word, so who is the "best" option in this regard? Notice you didn't answer the question directly either. Moved the goalpost to a Hasan Piker argument (that dude isn't smart)
I didn’t know who Hasan Piker was until last week. I’ve never heard the fella utter a single word.
My thinking comes from people like Baynard Rustin, Martin Luther King, A. Phillip Randolph, Caesar Chavez, etc. those who had an imagination for a better world than what politicians were willing to offer.
Also, you act as if we can't demand more while simultaneously recognizing that we are in a unique circumstance where this isn't a typical election cycle. Do you not agree that Trump is an entirely different situation than a mitt Romney, and very much needs to be kept out of office as a priority? You can ensure both are worked towards. Running interference however, is an indication that you think this is a normal election cycle.
None of you demand more because you refuse criticism. Since I’ve been a voter, that’s been the modus operandi for the Democratic Party and in that time it’s moved to the right.
I also don’t know or care about Mitt Romney. Stay on the topic.
And touching on the former point, Biden was moved more to the left on many issues after election, which is what will have to happen here. As Harris' stance on Medicare and such is immensely better than Trumps, and Walz is there also...the most progressive government in the country.
Biden had one center left major bill and watered that down to appease Joe Manchin. Stop this.
I am being critical of the Harris campaign, including cavorting with republicans, Trump means nothing to me because I know he a monster.
So you are saying that condoning the logic of voting for Harris in this circumstance means I automatically don't care about Gaza? And shows a lack of humanity? When it will likely result in less deaths? And accoubts for more than just one demographic? Tell me where that makes sense. Sounds like you think voting for Harris means you automatically don't care about Gaza or something.
this isn’t a real person‘s statement. We are sitting on possibly hundreds of thousands of people who have either died, will die as a result of this conflict or have lost their livelihood and you are still running with the “well they should be grateful it’s not worse.” This line of thinking has no humanity.
You framing this as "you don't care about genocide" is what you need to do to try and make a false equivalence between my choice to account for everyone, and their choice to forsake many groups for only their own
with all due respect, you don’t care about whats happening in Palestine. You dismissed the thousands who have lost their lives as “it could be worse,” and have chided people who think the Harris campaign‘s lack of any condemnation of the Israeli government is wrong. You don’t care and I am fairly confident in that position.
Everything I've posted was in regards to showcasing the logic of why it's important to vote. If you are voting Harris, then you concede my more important message anyway.
However you didn't answer my question...are you of the mind that Donald trump isn't a unique situation that needs to be prevented from entering office. Do you think this is politics as usual?
Trump is not relevant to you saying Harris laid out a ceasefire plan that will lead to peace despite you not knowing what that plan was. (You didn’t, I shared it with you. you were impressed by the word “ceasefire.”)