i'm not impressedKamala calls Trump a "loser" and "coward" all of the time.
Trump should be an object of ridicule, not a source of fear
i'm not impressedKamala calls Trump a "loser" and "coward" all of the time.
Using logic is absolutely pointless lol.Why doesnt anyone tell any of these Republicans this simple fact:
If Trump won the 2020 election, he couldnt run in 2024.
This going back and forth with all of these idiots is beyond unnecessary.
can someone tell this crone to shut the fukk up, and go away she isn't helping
nah, because the alternative is worse go live in china for a month, and report back to us. as bad as the misinformation has gotten on twitter....it has to be that wayIf we're being honest our democracy cannot survive this level of misinformation constantly being peddled out. Hilary is right as she was about things in 2016. Many of us just didn't want to hear it.
I got called up by a Somali breh in Seattle who called me a tool cause I said I wanted Harris to win. He said so genocide isn’t a redline? I’m like you want me to want Trump to win so the Dems can be punished?@FAH1223 the Muslims for Harris call worked
It doesn't have to be that way. It doesn't have to be Hillary's way, either. Social media companies need to do a hell of a better job of dealing with harmful shyt like child exploitation material, threats of violence, hate speech and disinformation, but getting rid of Section 230 will just make them over-moderate everything just to avoid lawsuits, and I think that will have a detrimental effect on speech, and lead to the loss of a lot of smaller platforms and communities like this one. Instead, we should push for clearer rules on what counts as harmful content, and push platforms to act responsibly, while investing in media literacy initiatives.nah, because the alternative is worse go live in china for a month, and report back to us. as bad as the misinformation has gotten on twitter....it has to be that way
and i'm definitely not turning over the legal definition of truth, to the same people who decided what "the science" was in 2020
see, you're a perfect example of what i'm talking about. someone as confused as you, is is no position to determine what "truth" isIt doesn't have to be that way. It doesn't have to be Hillary's way, either. Social media companies need to do a hell of a better job of dealing with harmful shyt like child exploitation material, threats of violence, hate speech and disinformation, but getting rid of Section 230 will just make them over-moderate everything just to avoid lawsuits, and I think that will have a detrimental effect on speech, and lead to the loss of a lot of smaller platforms and communities like this one. Instead, we should push for clearer rules on what counts as harmful content, and push platforms to act responsibly, while investing in media literacy initiatives.