Don't make me get Scott Steiner and Kevin Nash up in here giving up political takes and Steiner Math on the path to 270
shyt... I would pay for an election night show with Steiner breaking down the math
Shall we see what Chat GpT can do since you sent me on a Scott Steiner rabbit hole?
You know, they say that all politicians are created equal, but you look at Kamala Harris, and you look at Trump and Jill Stein, and you can see that’s not true! See, normally in a three-way race, you’ve got a 33 1/3 percent chance of winning, but Kamala’s got government experience, and Trump? He’s too busy dodging subpoenas to even think about policy! And Jill Stein? She’s in the Green Party—she’s got a 0 percent chance, and that’s being generous!
So if you take Trump’s lack of a platform, subtract Jill Stein’s nonexistent support, and add Kamala’s administrative prowess, that gives her 100% of the presidential power, minus the margin of error, which is Trump’s base of, what, 10 percent of the voting public? So you take 90 percent of the rest of America, add it to Kamala’s 33 1/3 percent chance of winning, and now she’s operating at 123 1/3 percent efficiency!