2024 U.S. Presidential Election Thread: Donald Trump wins & will return to the White House; GOP wins U.S. Senate & U.S. House

WHO WINS?


  • Total voters
    349

Conan

Superstar
Joined
Apr 24, 2016
Messages
4,905
Reputation
1,063
Daps
15,610
Reppin
Brooklyn
I shouldn't be surprised by this but a lot of people who were shouting about Kamala not being clear about policy are still not discussing policy after she added this section to her webpage...

:smh:

Not much to discuss. It's normal for a president to have a policy page, even if some of it is great, some is mid, some is abhorrent, and in general it looks like someone fed a prompt into ChatGPT and copy pasted.

What's not normal is a presidential candidate not having a policy page. Even if they're running against a psycho.
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
179,919
Reputation
22,515
Daps
588,262
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
TBH, I believe the NC numbers. Not saying Kamala has it wrapped up but Robinson is a historically bad candidate and the split-ticket trends in NC tell me that if Robinson were to lose by double digits, Kamala would likely squeeze by with a win there..

Plus, Quinnipiac is a great pollster.

People should be happy about that number today.
 

acri1

The Chosen 1
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
24,000
Reputation
3,755
Daps
104,999
Reppin
Detroit
Not much to discuss. It's normal for a president to have a policy page, even if some of it is great, some is mid, some is abhorrent, and in general it looks like someone fed a prompt into ChatGPT and copy pasted.

What's not normal is a presidential candidate not having a policy page. Even if they're running against a psycho.

Kamala had to put together a campaign on historically short notice. It's understandable for some of this stuff to come out later than normal.
 

Outlaw

New Hope For the HaveNotz
Joined
May 6, 2012
Messages
5,427
Reputation
191
Daps
17,466
Reppin
Buzz City, NC :blessed:
Not much to discuss. It's normal for a president to have a policy page, even if some of it is great, some is mid, some is abhorrent, and in general it looks like someone fed a prompt into ChatGPT and copy pasted.

What's not normal is a presidential candidate not having a policy page. Even if they're running against a psycho.
What’s not normal is to pretend that you’re an American when you’re actually a bloody bloke from the UK
 

No1

Retired.
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
30,020
Reputation
4,716
Daps
66,852
NYT Sienna is an excellent pollster but I also think the new registrations numbers favor Harris. I think that people not understanding polls or just straight up being confused by 2016 has turned them intro the political equivalent of anti-analytics truthers in sports. I think analytics are used wrong - I don’t think the idea of them is wrong.
Let me follow up on this because some people dapped this up a minute ago - so I went and looked at their metrics and they came up with Republicans +3 in voting ID/registration. I don’t think that’s a smart assumption to make and that’s probably why they are out of line with other pollsters. It’s not an insane proposition but I think they’re wrong. They were slightly behind other good pollsters in 2020 and 2022. I think it’s worth considering but I would bet on Harris if you told me to put money on it right now if it takes an R +3 assumption to have her tied.
 
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
34,006
Reputation
2,083
Daps
166,206
ok, so, the reason everyone is geeking out over the north carolina numbers is that these results says harris practically has this in the bag if it holds.

taking nc and losing would require an utter collapse in both the rust and sun belt, which is improbable if she’s able to secure that state.

:unimpressed:
 
Top