2024-2025 NFL Random Observations Thread

Joined
Nov 16, 2012
Messages
7,320
Reputation
638
Daps
19,684
Reppin
NULL
It don’t make sense how little Saquon ($14.75M) and Derrick Henry ($11M) are making relative to the value they provide. I don’t understand why elite RBs don’t push for balloon 1 year deals for $25M if teams don’t wanna give them long term lucrative deals. Become a hired gun for the highest bidder.
Running back probably has the highest potential for injury since you're getting hit by defenders each touch so RBs want the extra guaranteed money that the additional years provide.
What hurt almost all the RBs that hit free agency last year was that they had down years that season (i.e., Saquon, Henry, Jacobs, Pollard). If they would have had seasons like they had this year going to free agency they probably could have demand deals similar to what CMac was able to get with his extension which was close to $20M/year.
 

lib123

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
6,975
Reputation
541
Daps
14,345
Running back probably has the highest potential for injury since you're getting hit by defenders each touch so RBs want the extra guaranteed money that the additional years provide.
What hurt almost all the RBs that hit free agency last year was that they had down years that season (i.e., Saquon, Henry, Jacobs, Pollard). If they would have had seasons like they had this year going to free agency they probably could have demand deals similar to what CMac was able to get with his extension which was close to $20M/year.

Understood but the extra years don’t provide much additional guaranteed money. That’s a good point about them having a down year. But imagine if Saquon signed a 1 year deal last year and was a FA this offseason? Teams in win-now mode with tons of cap space like the Commanders would throw him the bag.
 

Thavoiceofthevoiceless

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
44,382
Reputation
5,348
Daps
137,233
Reppin
The Voiceless Realm
Understood but the extra years don’t provide much additional guaranteed money. That’s a good point about them having a down year. But imagine if Saquon signed a 1 year deal last year and was a FA this offseason? Teams in win-now mode with tons of cap space like the Commanders would throw him the bag.
I wouldn't necessarily be so sure about that. Their value is based on their product compared to their contract.

Three of those guys went to perfect situations compared to where they were last year, so their numbers had more of an impact. Barkley just wouldn't have that if he was still with the Giants.
 

lib123

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
6,975
Reputation
541
Daps
14,345
I wouldn't necessarily be so sure about that. Their value is based on their product compared to their contract.

Three of those guys went to perfect situations compared to where they were last year, so their numbers had more of an impact. Barkley just wouldn't have that if he was still with the Giants.

Saquon is worth a 1 year $20-25M deal for the Commanders.
 

yseJ

Empire strikes back
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
45,190
Reputation
2,690
Daps
65,460
Reppin
The Yay
is Puka the most complete all-around WR in the league right now ? :jbhmm:
hes definitely got a case
 

lib123

Superstar
Joined
Jun 16, 2015
Messages
6,975
Reputation
541
Daps
14,345
other positions, yes as RBs are going to continue to get the short end stick of that compared to years and money.

If anything, these performances this year at their dollar value hurts them in the long run.

Ok yeah I agree. Yeah the injury risk and the steep drop in performance is why running backs aren’t getting more. That’s why I think it’s better for elite running backs to sign big one year deals. But then again I guess they would face the franchise tag.
 

Spence

Superstar
Joined
Jul 14, 2015
Messages
18,119
Reputation
3,012
Daps
47,182
Tried to tell all yall that Goodell having a no ngas bowl :mjpls:

Ravens Commanders is never happening on his watch :dead:
 
Top