Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,593
So when he was stumping for Upton and took a 200k payment that was for his presidential run.

Man uncle Joe got you hoodwinked.

:mjlol:

You can’t admit his admiration for Republicans is problematic because they are the op. This shyt ain’t 2002 it’s 2020, too much has happened for anysane candidate to promote the idea of bipartisanship. You should have blamed the slip up on his Tourette’s, but he has a history of hurting minorities and white working class people alongside Republicans so that would have led to
Nowhere too.

:pachaha:
Your acting like 2018 ain’t happen and there isn’t clear evidence Dems can whip the Republicans ass cause everyone is tired of their shyt.

Post proof of him hurting minorities or white working class people. :russell:


You juelzing so hard you oughta be a dipset impersonator :mjlol:
 

JMurder

SOHH Member since 01...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reputation
1,082
Daps
20,406
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
if you’re a black liberal. Being anti corporation money is probably the most blatantly racist leftist liberals are pushing to not let black candidates prosper.

the fact that some Black ppl co-sign that thinking is so retarded :snoop:
I'm willing to hear the explanation for this. Why is being anti corporation money a push to not let black candidates prosper
 

Warren Moon

Superstar
Supporter
Joined
Jun 1, 2014
Messages
8,656
Reputation
760
Daps
25,593
I'm willing to hear the explanation for this. Why is being anti corporation money a push to not let black candidates prosper


Bc white leftists liberals that push this rely on some of the wealthiest white communities to start the campaigning and then get the vast majority of their donations from individuals with the average net worth that is a 100-1 ratio to black net worth.

If black progressives/liberals actually get a black candidate to the forefront of a presidential race if they don’t fit “progressive” idealist fundraising framework they’re pushing, they will be seen as not a true progressive.

It’s dangerous in 3 ways

1. If a black progressive is actually pushed up by a black base. If they attempt to replicate the “true progressive fundraising method” they are depending on a community that has 4-5x less people and 100x less money. The number of ppl and the monetary donations they can possibly provide could not sustain them even at the earliest stages of a presidential campaign.

2. Any candidate that depends on the entire population in securing donations in the “true progressive fundraising method” they inevitably will need to secure a large amount of white donors and could be seen as not a true “pro black” progressive candidate by the black community

3. If black progressives accept this new “true progressive fundraising method” and a black progressive candidate depends on a mix of black donations + corporate money/rich donors, other progressive competitors will use this as showing that they’re not a true progressive candidate.

Black progressives can not accept this narrative as the new normal. It’ll only hurt black progressive candidates that come from and are supported by the black community.

we can not let this become the standard.
 

JMurder

SOHH Member since 01...
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
13,627
Reputation
1,082
Daps
20,406
Reppin
Bronx, NYC
Bc white leftists liberals that push this rely on some of the wealthiest white communities to start the campaigning and then get the vast majority of their donations from individuals with the average net worth that is a 100-1 ratio to black net worth.

If black progressives/liberals actually get a black candidate to the forefront of a presidential race if they don’t fit “progressive” idealist fundraising framework they’re pushing, they will be seen as not a true progressive.

It’s dangerous in 3 ways

1. If a black progressive is actually pushed up by a black base. If they attempt to replicate the “true progressive fundraising method” they are depending on a community that has 4-5x less people and 100x less money. The number of ppl and the monetary donations they can possibly provide could not sustain them even at the earliest stages of a presidential campaign.

2. Any candidate that depends on the entire population in securing donations in the “true progressive fundraising method” they inevitably will need to secure a large amount of white donors and could be seen as not a true “pro black” progressive candidate by the black community

3. If black progressives accept this new “true progressive fundraising method” and a black progressive candidate depends on a mix of black donations + corporate money/rich donors, other progressive competitors will use this as showing that they’re not a true progressive candidate.

Black progressives can not accept this narrative as the new normal. It’ll only hurt black progressive candidates that come from and are supported by the black community.

we can not let this become the standard.
Interesting, are they really getting their money from rich cacs tho? I'm gonna have to research this. Either way, I feel like a black candidate can easily circumvent these issues if they get creative
 

FAH1223

Go Wizards, Go Terps, Go Packers!
Staff member
Supporter
Joined
May 16, 2012
Messages
74,636
Reputation
8,701
Daps
224,350
Reppin
WASHINGTON, DC
Bc white leftists liberals that push this rely on some of the wealthiest white communities to start the campaigning and then get the vast majority of their donations from individuals with the average net worth that is a 100-1 ratio to black net worth.

If black progressives/liberals actually get a black candidate to the forefront of a presidential race if they don’t fit “progressive” idealist fundraising framework they’re pushing, they will be seen as not a true progressive.

It’s dangerous in 3 ways

1. If a black progressive is actually pushed up by a black base. If they attempt to replicate the “true progressive fundraising method” they are depending on a community that has 4-5x less people and 100x less money. The number of ppl and the monetary donations they can possibly provide could not sustain them even at the earliest stages of a presidential campaign.

2. Any candidate that depends on the entire population in securing donations in the “true progressive fundraising method” they inevitably will need to secure a large amount of white donors and could be seen as not a true “pro black” progressive candidate by the black community

3. If black progressives accept this new “true progressive fundraising method” and a black progressive candidate depends on a mix of black donations + corporate money/rich donors, other progressive competitors will use this as showing that they’re not a true progressive candidate.

Black progressives can not accept this narrative as the new normal. It’ll only hurt black progressive candidates that come from and are supported by the black community.

we can not let this become the standard.

You're Juelizing :wtf:
 
Top