2016 Coliseum #WPOY voting IN HERE

[NYC Rebel]

Too many terrible ones to even narrow the field, to be honest. Strongest class of WOAT posters in years.

 

[G.O.A.T Squad Spokesman]

I said the trolls was going to come for anyone that said something positive about me and I see its happened in this thread. The hate is real.

 

[Sccit]

What about in 09 against orlando?

HE AINT GUNA COPY N PASTE STATS FROM A SERIES THAT DOESNT SUPPORT HIS RHETORIC

 

[Floyd Pinkerton]

I have never seen you post anything that was not 100% dumpster fire.

There is a part of me that feels like your tireless jihad against logic and sentence structure is impressive. But that part is dwarfed by how strongly I feel like you should be relegated into some remedial internet posting forum. Like a Maccabbi Haifa, league 2 type team. Where you and other awful posters can practice against each other until you have earned the right to play with the adults.

Also, I think you pretend you like to talk in all caps, when in reality your keyboard is broken and you're too embarrassed to ask for help.

How dare you speak to L.A.'s most blunted in that manner

 

[360Waves]

It's between @Sccit and TeriyakiThoughts.

Gangstar is pretty garbage but I'm strongly convinced he's just trolling 95% of the time and doesn't mean what he says.

 

[Donald Trumps Twitter]

so speaking facts and not cockslobbering over Lebron = wpoy

 

[Bilz]

so speaking facts and not cockslobbering over Lebron = wpoy

If you're going to take pride in your nomination, you need to understand why you got it.

You're a stupid irrational Kobestan who uses idealistic fantasy to argue in favor of Kobe and against LeBron even when reality contradicts what you say. You should have been aborted.

 

[Donald Trumps Twitter]

If you're going to take pride in your nomination, you need to understand why you got it.

You're a stupid irrational Kobestan who uses idealistic fantasy to argue in favor of Kobe and against LeBron even when reality contradicts what you say. You should have been aborted.

The thing is I acknowledge the fact Lebron is the best player in the NBA.


You cockslobbers try to discredit every single accomplishment Kobe has. You try and say Duncan was more significant and impactful to the league than Kobe, so much damn disrespect

 

[Draje]

stop quoting me you fakkit

Stop being a board cancer, bytch

 

[Professor Emeritus]

My man came in to clinch that POTY
They'll dismiss half this post as "condescending nonsense" (sccit) and the other half as lebron dikkriding (the other illiterates)

man shut up no one wants to read your essays

Five daps and a quote/POTY praise....looks like you lost Gangstarman.

What about in 09 against orlando?

HE AINT GUNA COPY N PASTE STATS FROM A SERIES THAT DOESNT SUPPORT HIS RHETORIC

What the hell do you think stats from 2009 show? Lebron played fantastic in 2009, Kobe played well too. Tell me what you even think your argument is before I can support it or refute it.

It's between @Sccit and TeriyakiThoughts.

Gangstar is pretty garbage but I'm strongly convinced he's just trolling 95% of the time and doesn't mean what he says.

You could be right.

 

[Rigby.]

The thing is I acknowledge the fact Lebron is the best player in the NBA.


You cockslobbers try to discredit every single accomplishment Kobe has. You try and say Duncan was more significant and impactful to the league than Kobe, so much damn disrespect

Tim did lead (co-lead at the beginning) his franchise to being relevant in 3 different decades. Meanwhile Shaq had Kobe help the Lakers forge a crazy successful dynasty that was eventually ended, in about a 5 or so year span. Then Kobe basically disappeared from actual postseason success until Paul Gasol and those Lakers bigs became the bus he drove for 3 or 4 years of glory, and then he ended his career with consecutive body breaking injuries and annually playing for an embarrassment.

So you got 18 of the Spurs being a legitimate contender vs a combined, lets say 11 of Kobe and the Lakers being able to say the same. Is it really that unreasonable for one to say Duncan impacted the league more if the team he led impacted the league more?

 

[Professor Emeritus]

dude listed dankster as a POTY

I got laughed at by Potier.
When the only two people who dap your post are the two leading candidates for WPOY....you might be in trouble.

Why don't you just go back to Higher Learning where you can cape for White folk some more...or to the Locker Room where you can desperately try to defend yourself in massive exposal threads.




I only remember one extended argument with you in the Coliseum ever, where you desperately tried to prove how stupid you could be regarding Kobe. It went something like this....

Duncan and MJ keep their efficiency up where it was in the regular seaon. Kobe keeps his efficiency down where it was in the regular season.

And yet he could score from all parts of the floor above league average efficiency unlike Lebron

Maybe one day Lebron will be able to consistently shoot in volume outside the paint or in transition.

So if you can score from all parts of the floor with above-average efficiency, and yet you consistently choose to shoot the most inefficient shots, what does that make you? I don't think anyone has ever disputed Kobe's talent, just how he uses it.

But here, let's see if Kobe really was above-average from all parts of the floor in his last healthy season, when Kobe-stans were still claiming he was a potential MVP candidate:

Hmm, looks like you were lying.

And here's Lebron that same year. Holy fukk, look at how much better he is:

Looks like he can shoot from three and from the elbows quite efficiently and in volume too. Wait, those spots are outside the paint, right?

So, Poitier fails in his first argument where he tried to claim Kobe can "score from all parts of the floor above league average efficiency unlike Lebron".

This idiot thought he had something using lebrons regular season numbers when it's known his efficiency dives off the cliff in the playoffs
Using an over the hill Kobe shot chart when discussing his capability during his back to back
Wipe that nut out your eyes doggie

You fools just lost bad.

Kobe shot 46.3% in 2013.

That was his SECOND BEST shooting season since 2002. The ONLY season after 2002 where Kobe shot better than that was in 2009 when he shot 46.7%, and his best shooting season EVER was 46.9%.

So I just showed you one of Kobe's best-looking shooting charts ever, virtually identical to his very best season, and you want to act like some season in which he shot WORSE (like almost every single season from 2003 to 2012), he'd somehow have a better-looking shooting chart?

Ya'all are done. Kobe stans are illogical as fukk, throwing out stupid false shyt left and right and hoping something sticks.

Lebron is 49.6% career shooter in the regular season, 47.9% in the playoffs.

Kobe is 45.1% career shooter in the regular season, 44.8% in the playoffs.

So Lebron goes from 4.5% better than Kobe to "only" 3.1% better than Kobe.

If Lebron's efficiency dives off a cliff in the playoffs, then Kobe was already at the bottom of the cliff and is now drowning somewhere in the stream.

So, Poitier fails in his goalpost-shifting argument where he tries to claim the Lebron's efficiency "falls off a cliff" during the playoffs, as well as trying to claim that 2013 was a poor shooting season for Kobe when it was actually one of his best.

True shooting percentage fam and lebrons drop off is vast whether it be this year 2013 2012 2011

You're such a fukking hypocrit. I showed you the shooting charts we have, which show Lebron more efficient all over the floor than Kobe. Do you have any opposing evidence? "You go by what the evidence says", right?




Oh, so now we'll lie about true shooting pecentage then? Here are Lebron's playoff numbers for every fukking season:

06: 56%
07: 52%
08: 53%
09: 62%
10: 61%
11: 56%
12: 58%
13: 59%
14: 67%
15: 49%
[16: 59% - new edit]

Career True Shooting % in the playoffs? 57%

Wanna guess what his career true shooting % in the regular season is? 58%

Kobe, meanwhile, rocks 55% in the regular season, 54% in the playoffs.

Just take the fukking L man. You've been wrong over, and over, and over, and over.

So, Poitier fails in his second goalpost-shifting argument where he tried to claim that it was actually Lebron's TS% that fell off the cliff.

Notice you didn't post the regular season true shooting percentage

This is the second time you did this. Are you unable to read, "regular season"?

I would just call you an incompetent reader, but it's pretty clear that you're just straight lying.

Lebron's career playoff TS% is just 1% lower than his career regular season TS%.[...the same drop that Kobe has]

So, Poitier fails in his attempt to lie and claim that I hadn't posted the regular season true shooting percentage.

(There was a side argument in there where Poitier attempted to claim that his real argument was that Lebron's TS% actually fell off in 3 out of 13 seasons....but that was simply too stupid to even copy.)



And then Potier desperately tried to turn the argument to "volume shooting", and claims that Lebron is inferior to Kobe because he can't make threes in volume. This might have been his stupidest argument yet:

its not because he doesn't take them, its because he can't make them consistently on volume.

Lebron has a higher career 3pt% than Kobe. For his career, Lebron averages 1.4 threes a game as a 34% clip. For his career, Kobe averages 1.3 threes a game at a 33% clip.

on WAYYYYY less volume

Are you stupid? Can't read what I already put right there for you? Lebron averages 1.4 threes a game for his career, Kobe averages 1.3 threes a game for his career.

Lebron has MORE volume than Kobe, not WAYYYYY less.

You see, this where a reasonable person says, "I thought Lebron had WAYYYYY less volume on threes than Kobe, but he actually has more. My Kobe Stanned-eyes must be lying to me, I should reevaluate my position."

But you won't, because that's not what Kobe Stans do. You'll now just proceed to ignore the blatant factual inaccuracy you just made, and will make more of them.

Kobe 5079 3 pt attempted

Lebron 3671 3 pt attempted
You failed math and english, huh?

No way you are this stupid in the rest of your life. This has to be a special disease that only comes up with Kobe is being talked about.

Kobe has played 19 seasons. Lebron has played 12 seasons.

Kobe has shot 267 threes/season. Lebron has shot 306 threes/season. And Lebron has made them at a higher rate.

Lebron shoots threes at a higher volume than Kobe. You can't deny that.

And up there at the top, didn't you say, "but we weren't discussing career"??? Do you know what the phrase "cherry-picking" means?

rate and volume are not synonymous


fail 9th grade algebra

You fail for not knowing basic basketball terminology. Is Tim Duncan a "volume shooter" because he's taken 20,000 career shots?

"Volume shooting" in the NBA is taking a lot of shots when you're in the game. It is NOT a comment on the length of your career. You've gone full-idiot now. It's like the Kobe Stan elite level.


Potier, you arguments have become so stupid that there's nothing left to see here.

So tell me, explain your argument.

I told you that Lebron shot threes at a higher % than Kobe did.

I told you that Lebron made more threes/game than Kobe did.

I told you that Lebron made more threes/season than Kobe did.


But to a Kobe Stan, Kobe is better because he's had WAAAAAAYYY more volume on threes than Lebron, by which you now claim to have meant....just that he's been around longer.

WTF about the fact that Kobe has played more seasons have anything to do with our discussion of three-point shooting?

not know what the word volume means and embarrass yourself

fail algebra

And finally, Poiter fails in his attempt to claim that Kobe is actually a superior three-point shooter to Lebron due to his "greater volume".


Somewhere in there you also tried to argue that Kobe was just as good a rebounder and finisher as Lebron because what counts is "relative to his position" (which apparently didn't factor in for you when it came to things like three-point shooting, ballhandling, and running the offense, of course. )

You Ethered that fukkboy. Too bad he's a Tobe nut sucker who just hates Bron.

 

[Poitier]

see what im talking about

 

[Sccit]

so speaking facts and not cockslobbering over Lebron = wpoy

LOL IF LEBRON LOST WE'D BE IN POTY RUNNIN RIGHT NOW BY THESE SPINELESS NERDS

Five daps and a quote/POTY praise....looks like you lost Gangstarman.








What the hell do you think stats from 2009 show? Lebron played fantastic in 2009, Kobe played well too. Tell me what you even think your argument is before I can support it or refute it.








You could be right.

 

[Professor Emeritus]

see what im talking about

LOL IF LEBRON LOST WE'D BE IN POTY RUNNIN RIGHT NOW BY THESE SPINELESS NERDS

The unholy trinity speaks again.


And you don't get it, Scceet. Your arguments aren't stupid because they're wrong. Your comments are incredibly dumb regardless of whether they're right or wrong - they just happen to be wrong a lot because being dumb isn't condusive to getting things right.

If you were a Lebron stan, you'd still be a really ignorant one making dumb arguments. The fact you don't realize that is why your posting doesn't improve over time. The Dunning-Kruger effect continues to be something you need to read up on and understand.


I have a question - are any of the three of you embarrassed to be associated with the other two? Seriously, even if you believe that you yourself aren't a total tool, isn't it a bit disconcerting for you to see two obvious morons agreeing with you over and over and no one else dapping you at all?

So first you claim that I'm not going to talk about it, but when I offer to talk about it after you go ahead and clarify what the hell there even is to talk about, you try to run away.