Id just like to say
UCLA
Stanford
Oregon
Alabama
FSU
Florida
S.Carolina
LSU
Notre Dame
Auburn
Ohio State
Michigan
Oklahoma
Georgia
Texas
The Combs dynasty lives on, ya'll dieId just like to say
UCLA
Stanford
Oregon
Alabama
FSU
Florida
S.Carolina
LSU
Notre Dame
Auburn
Ohio State
Michigan
Oklahoma
Georgia
Texas
nikka.....he was trying to make it work at UW......UW fukkin sucks and is always over hyped....Sark will do fine at SC......he is an alum and wanted this job for quite some time.....USC's biggest problem is this:
you took a coach back to your program that proved he can't succeed in your conference. He squandered VERY talented squads and failed to recruit well in a time when the powerhouse team in the conference was down.
why would you accept him to lead your team?
nikka.....he was trying to make it work at UW......UW fukkin sucks and is always over hyped....Sark will do fine at SC......he is an alum and wanted this job for quite some time.....
LMFAO........the talent at USC>>>>>the talent at UW.....that is really all that needs to be said.....you can blame that shyt on coaching if you want......but UW was over hyped last year....and there schedule was no joke.....LOL @ "He should've made them better".......nikka please.......He lost many games he wasn't supposed to, he lost close games, and was blown out in others. Washington found a way to lose in every imaginable way during his time. They performed shamefully in big games...that is COACHING. He had two VERY LEGIT QBs, one CLEARLY NFL READY QB and nfl ready RB and the best TE in america...didn't win anything.
UW did NOT HAVE to 'fukkin suck'. He should've made them better and you're going to suffer the same fate.
that is progress but you know good and well not winning the pac 12 during that time is badTaking a Washington team from 0 wins to wins 5 wins to 7 wins to 8 wins isn't succeeding?
Dumb shyt if i ever heard such
the talent at usc now >>>>> the talent at UW. but "he should've made them better" means he should've recruited better and he didn't and he lost a LOT of dumb games. Losing the WORST applecup ever by a FG to an awful wazu? and your reward is like the 3rd best coaching job in america?LMFAO........the talent at USC>>>>>the talent at UW.....that is really all that needs to be said.....you can blame that shyt on coaching if you want......but UW was over hyped last year....and there schedule was no joke.....LOL @ "He should've made them better".......nikka please.......
Season's here so i"ll say is USC aint Washington, and we'll show you on the fieldthat is progress but you know good and well not winning the pac 12 during that time is bad
5 seasons
29 losses
34 wins
what the hell
2009
Washington
5
7
0
0.41667
313
320
-7
2010
Washington
7
6
0
0.53846
284
381
-97
2011
Washington
7
6
0
0.53846
434
467
-33
2012
Washington
7
6
0
0.53846
312
314
-2
2013
Washington
8
4
0
0.66667
462
281
181
you're losing on average 6 games a year and thats success? With outstanding skill position players? And you can't coach them up?
I got no illwill toward USC Silkk you should really know that, but I think you've made a mistake is all