the Heisman is suppose to be about the best college player, so why are analysts now trying to make the case for johnny over jameis by saying he doesn't have the supporting cast that jameis does?... lol get the fukk outta here...when has the rest of the team mattered besides wins/losses when it comes to the Heisman?...if they think he should win it cause of the numbers he putting up, cool, but don't try to downplay what jameis doing with the 'he has better talent around him' bullshyt...