18 yr old FL girl may have to register as a sex offender after dating a freshman

Slystallion

Live to Strive
WOAT
Supporter
Joined
May 4, 2012
Messages
13,106
Reputation
-10,422
Daps
17,418
Again her parents have the right to protect their daughters. nikkas go to jail all the time over underage p*ssy. Now a chic does it it's a problem. :heh:

Bet you if that was your daughter getting her back blown whether it be a nikka or a bytch ytou would have a problem :childplease:

if my daughter is getting her black blown out by her choice and shes 15 or 16...thats on her...you can only do so much to make sure they take care of themselves but you can't watch them 24/7

now if she is getting raped you get the shotgun...plenty of girls that age are the ones who are seeking it and the aggressors towards the guys
 

aqualung

I wear a crown of curls.
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
5,201
Reputation
70
Daps
2,812
Reppin
NYC, Boston, #ByrdGang
:sitdown: you think the parents woulda been going to court once their daughters 17 year old boyfriend turned 18?

Its a 2 year difference, the law is bullshyt and the parents prolly did it because they didn't approve of a lesbian relationship.

Agreed.

I am told that the relevant law contains an age buffer (allegedly violated by Hunt). The FL Romeo and Juliet law allows adults 24yo and younger to have sexual relationships with kids 16yo and older. But not 15yo kids. NO!

The police report claims that the girls were 18 and 15 at the start of the relationship.
Or maybe the younger girl was 14yo when it started. http://www.nytimes.com/2013/05/22/u...nters-with-friend-14-gets-online-support.html
Hunt penetrated the minor girl on multiple occasions, and there was oral sex at Hunt's place when the minor girl ran away from home to meet up with Hunt.

I pity Hunt. Why didn't the minor girl's parents issue a warning before bringing charges? Why so callous?

Would the minor girl's parents have objected to their daughter dating a MALE 18yo HS senior football star/scholar-athlete? What if he was black? :rolleyes:
 

aqualung

I wear a crown of curls.
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
5,201
Reputation
70
Daps
2,812
Reppin
NYC, Boston, #ByrdGang
...It's a grey area. When I was 17 and a senior, I started dating a 16 yo junior. My birthday was four months before hers, so I was 18 while she was still 16. Right after her, I dated a 17 yo broad while I was 19. Dated for the next two years. According to the law, I was a pedophile sex offender :why:
Depending on the state. It varies state to state.

You guys are correct. The parents control enforcement of such laws.
--Obviously kids having consensual sex are not going to squeal.
--Cops are not paid to walk HS halls asking who dates whom.
But ticked off parents are better able to protect their kids from unions deemed unsuitable using such statutes.

The law is intended to make an adult lover back off when parents say "leave my minor child alone!" Too bad Hunt was not warned up front. I suspect that the minor girl's parents are making an example of her for being a lesbian -- kinda like parents in the past have prosecuted black HS males who dated their yt daughters in violation of such laws. (I think those cases occurred before age buffers were added to these laws, mostly.)
 

Un-AmericanDreamer

Simp City
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
9,740
Reputation
1,312
Daps
30,387
Now I'm suppose to care now that's it's happening to a teenage lipstick lesbian white girl instead of some black man? I see you media. It's stupidity all around though, there should be a 4-year exception rule.
 

The Bilingual Gringo

Tucked in to the socks
Supporter
Joined
May 11, 2012
Messages
4,798
Reputation
920
Daps
9,384
Floriduh strikes again.

Pederass and lesbo though :huhldup: If they're still in high school, no big deal then.
 

Lakers Offseason

Superstar
Joined
May 21, 2012
Messages
6,371
Reputation
981
Daps
12,719
Reppin
NULL
Let's just get this over with

r0AYH.gif
 

Chris Mauro

Banned
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
1,387
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,174
I think the main issue is that they're lesbians




Back in the 1920s it was normal for dudes to marry chicks who were 16.



I doubt they would have charged her if she was an 18 yr old boy and the girl was 16.



The south is ass backwards
 

Chris Mauro

Banned
Joined
Jun 17, 2012
Messages
1,387
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,174

16 is the legal age of consent, they wouldn't



it all comes down to the judges/police/politicians down there being bible belt Christians and viewing homosexuality/lesbians as demonic sin.



It's a bullsh1t ass charge and that's the only explanation for it. She wouldn't be locked up on the eastcost where people don't interbreed with their cousins
 
Top