Either he endorsed him or he didn't?
I'm not thrilled with her being the CIA director but she isn't some political hack or someone with their own financial agenda as far as I can tell which goes a long way in this administration.
I don't think you're a Republican because you're opposed to her I'm just wondering if Lamb is pure enough for you to support.
I though that was fair...
At the end of the day, I supported Hillary Clinton in 2016 and would prefer a democrat over a republican almost every time. Still doesn't mean that before it comes down to that binary choice, you can make judgment calls and have preferences.
But, you and your buddies are throwing around the term "purity politics" before any primary has taken place or any election situation. I thought the issue with purity was not supporting the eventual nominee after all the vetting that happens in a primary process takes place. Now you dopes are throwing the term around when either daring to ask the people we vote for to act in our interests or making a judgement on a politician before the primary process has even started. If you're not a braindead zombie this is when you should be putting people under a microscope. Its not purity politics, its being a thinking human being.
Now lets get back to the main point of the thread.