so if they are only commie mags doing this, then I assume you are only playing the role of a concerned citizen?aside from commie mags
![ehh :ehh: :ehh:](https://www.thecoli.com/styles/default/xenforo/smilies/ehh3.png)
so if they are only commie mags doing this, then I assume you are only playing the role of a concerned citizen?aside from commie mags
The problem here is as usual for you is that you're unable to comprehend what you're reading.
so if they are only commie mags doing this, then I assume you are only playing the role of a concerned citizen?![]()
Lol, you're literally nothing if you're not consistentaside from commie mags with their occasional hit pieces there is no evidence that charter schools or vouchers are a failure, quite the opposite, the evidence shows that overall charter schools and vouchers help black kids get better education than public schools
these hit pieces avoid a simple comparison of before and after, they avoid this because a simple before and after comparison would show what an absolute disaster the previous public school system in NO was
the problem is that people are just reading headlines, even reading through this hit piece its very obvious that the authors are just nitpicking and that the charter schools are a vast improvement over the previous decript public school system
No. People have posted and discussed numerous articles here that are in depth on the subject. To say there is a benefit here is to spit in the face of reality.
im the main person posting articles about charter schools and the evidence shows that charter schools are an imporovement over public schools
so you are avoiding the basic point, why is there not an apples to apples comparison between the old public school system and the new charter system?Lol, you're literally nothing if you're not consistent
The empty statements from you continue. You knowing just saying something doesn't make it true right?
How much of statistical improvements in New Orleans' schools is due to the death of 2,000 and displacement of 100,000s of the city's poorest? I imagine getting rid of many of the traditional lowest scorers would drastically better the scores of any district, regardless of acho
Which is why things like common core are just basic. People rant and rave against standardized tests but if there aren't exact standards its impossible to get accurate reads on how a school is doing. Which isn't to apologize for the excesses of testing regimens, but what's the alternative?
What is the point of schools to you? To me, a school should be used to educate our youth and help produce members of society who are well equipped for the world after education.
A graduation rate does not tell the whole story. What does a graduation rate mean if students coming from these charter schools are 2 to 3 standard deviations below in English and math then the public schools? They're doing this but still able to graduate?
That points to glaring flaws in the curriculum
so you are avoiding the basic point, why is there not an apples to apples comparison between the old public school system and the new charter system?
the reason is obvious, becuase the old public schools were a complete utter failure that had literally killed thousands of black minds
You can tell if a school is "good" or not just by looking at the racial demographics and the income-level.