objective fact that Vance looked more confident up thereWalz is a poor debater so I think he maybe narrowly lost, not because of policy though.
hillary wasn’t confident.I see fear in Kamala’s eyes. I wish she can speak more confidently. With her looks, and a Hilary confidence, this would have been a done deal.
Vance sounds like a snake used car salesman. He says things that he thinks you want to hear instead of what he feels. Trump does the same thing but he has 40 years of being "a celebrity" on his side.Earlier, I predicted that Walz would win based on his personable nature, and it seems I was right, judging by the consensus I'm seeing. Say what you will about his gaffes or eloquence, but between the two, he came across as the kind of guy you'd grab a beer with—the friendly neighbor who knows how to fix your car and one of those 'cool' teachers you'd hang out and chat with for hours after school. Walz understands people and how to speak to them.
Vance may be a better debater or even more intelligent than Walz, but he sounded as detached and unrelatable as any other politician in the past, which has led us to someone like Trump.
i was expecting Walz to dog walk Vance about J6, and Trump's loss in 2020. kamala too. talk about how trump is a sore loser and a cowardI see fear in Kamala’s eyes. I wish she can speak more confidently. With her looks, and a Hilary confidence, this would have been a done deal.
Vance is a "good debater" in the same vein as the tech bros or trolls on the internet who write paragraphs of nothing and treat it as a win when you don't engage in their BS. Walz ain't an eloquent speaker, but he spoke from the heart, and that was the major takeaway that many (including undecided voters) got from this debate and why I believe he won gaffes aside.Walz is a poor debater so I think he maybe narrowly lost, not because of policy though.
i was expecting Walz to dog walk Vance about J6, and Trump's loss in 2020. kamala too. talk about how trump is a sore loser and a coward
but all we got was "aw, shucks, it's too bad you guys refuse to accept the election results if you lose". it was pathetic. i don't know why the fukk the democrats are so soft on this
Being undecided one month out is crazy.I see why these voters on CNN are undecided. They sound like morons
It showed even though he's been a governor, he was very new to the public speaking thing. Give him a good 4 years of doing daily or weekly interviews and he'll look a lot more comfortableWalz is a poor debater so I think he maybe narrowly lost, not because of policy though.
Or cacs version of bothsiders
i.e Republican voter/agent who are too embarrassed or shook to admit their political leanings and voting intentions
The vast majority of people who claim to be undecided are always sympathetic to trump/gop and go hard on Dems and it isn't a coincidence