Kilgore Trout
Banned
Black Excellence 
The Euro-nuts are outraged. The DNA of Ramses III
- Thread starter RadaMillz
- Start date
Cat piss martini
Veteran
this is only news to white people....
once again you know what I meant in terms of proximity of relationyes all humans are related but ancient egyptians were more closesly related to west/east africans than anyone else
yes all humans are related but ancient egyptians were more closesly related to west/east africans than anyone else
not necessarily
closely related in what sense? geography? genetics? culture?
be specific
B-Rock Odrama
Banned
racially....as welll West African and East African groups descend from them.
I can't speak for East Africans, but West Africans DO NOT descend from Ancient Egyptians.
racially
they were all black.....that is my only point
just like nikkas in Australia and Papua New Guinea are black
no shyt
because there were people living in West Africa the same time people were living in Egypt
the point here is that both groups were BLACK
stop trying to play word games crakkka
No, but what is now being debated, is that Ancient Egyptians descended from West Africans. They found a structure that predates the pyramids, but deals with the same lining of orions belt. This theory isn't really new, but the evidence is stacking up now.
Read the book "Black Genesis: The Prehistoric Origins of Ancient Egypt " to learn more. And he's a white man, just in case you are the type who doesn't believe in black people who talk like this. Here's a video that you can watch of the author being interviewed about it:
[ame]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DdiPr_rrodg[/ame]
Regarding Zahi Hawass, the issue was that he accidently revealed King Tut's haplogroup, which happened to be R1B (Western Europe).
Don't let racist scientist fool you!.
How the hell can he be of Western European stock, and he was born in East Africa, along with his descendants?
What they did was see some genes in him that is similar to those from western europe, ignored his other genes that are similar to those in that part of Africa, then said his genes were Western European. It may be true, but it is trickery, and they hoped someone would fall for it. GTFOH.
He was royalty, and Egypt was known throughout the known world back then, so of course he had some type of mixing going on in his family, but to straight out state he was of Western European stock, is some bullshyt. How can anybody believe some of the shyt these "scientist" spew. They are like Principality of Zero with suits on.
Another thing they don't tell everyone in those articles is that some North Africans have the same genes. Why do they only say the genes is in western europeans, but rarely mention that it's in a region that is much closer to Egypt, and has a higher probability that is where King Tut got his genes from?. Racism that's why. It is low in the region of North Africa, which makes sense because royalty usually keep their associations to people that in their ranks, and fukk foreigners with the quickness, and babies will be born out of this. They just might not get to be heir to the throne. People do this now. How many times have we seen people who have a lot of guidelines when dating someone within their race, but pick someone who doesn't have the same guidelines when dating outside of their race?. People also do this when they go outside of the country to date people. They usually pick the prettiest women they find, not the one who comes from a family who are doing good for themselves. They want quick access to good p*ssy, that is all.
They ask how did those genes get into Egypt, instead of asking how did European get the genes?. There is a good chance King Tut or his people were fukking western European women like crazy, and spreading there seed. It happened with Genghis Khan, so there is a good chance that it happened with a KING OF A POWERFUL NATION. White Supremacy thinking is such a joke.
ok
in the broad definition that "Black" is u can make that argument
Egyptians encompassed a wide variety of skin complexions.
I have heard about Robert Bauval
I didn't listen to "racist scientist", it was Zawi Hawass who accidently released Tut's DNA profile. DNA doesn't lie. The R1B haplogroup is mostly found in Western Europe. It's possible that his ancestors mixed with European royals?Don't let racist scientist fool you!.
How the hell can he be of Western European stock, and he was born in East Africa, along with his descendants?
Because R1B only occurs in 2-10% of the population in Egypt, while it occurs in 60-100% in Western Europe, and upwards of 90%+ in the British Islands. It's pretty significant, statistically, anyway.
wat
Regarding Zahi Hawass, the issue was that he accidently revealed King Tut's haplogroup, which happened to be R1B (Western Europe).
I couldn't wait to get home & debunk this mess you just typed. Now after you absorb this information don't spread these lies you've learned from 'the discovery channel' any more. Mkay
King Tut was blacker than blacks in America today, even most Africans of current day prolly
"The Colchians, Ethiopians and Egyptians have thick lips, broad nose, woolly hair and they are burnt of skin." -- Herodotus, 450 BC
Last edited by a moderator:
The guy above me post of the video, explained it better then I did. Basically, You can't look at one part of a gene, and say he was white, and ignore the other genes, which is what they did. It is trickery, which is what they always do. When you use your common sense/street smarts, you can't get fooled so easily. Just the fact that King Tut was in Egypt, and not Western Europe tells you something about him being Western European, doesn't make a lot of sense. There is no writings giving any indication that his people came form western europe, so why would you think he is different. That is like saying someone isn't black, because they have some european in their genes, even though they grew up with, looks like, and have the culture of blacks. Only a fool would call that person white, being that they have some european in the genes.
This is King tut's tomb, does anyone look like they came from Western Europe?. Why would King Tut be from Western Europe, but have no people around him in HIS tomb resemble anyone from that region? Why would HE, HIMSELF, not be painted as someone who looks like a western european if that is where he was from?.
This is another egyptian tomb, and I don't see anyone who can pass for a European, yet we are discussing if Egyptians or King tut were white? People use your common sense, this is 2013, and the actual pictures of Egypt from the Egyptians THEMSELVES are easy to be seen. DON'T BE FOOLS!. The hair alone lets you know who they were back then. Blacks are the ONLY group with damn near everyone having hair like the one's in the pictures. It's like God gave us our distinct hair to let us easily be identified, because most people of the world are brown, but not everyone has kinky, wooly hair in abundance like we do.
