I agree with a lot of what you say, I just disagree he was in his athletic prime in 2000. The idea that an athletic prime correlates to a specific age is one of the most fallacious things to me in terms of sports (e.g. 27-28). It doesn't account for any number of variables: wear and tear, motivation, injury, personal physiology, lifestyle, etc. Hell, Ian Thorpe is probably the greatest speed swimmer of all-time and he was done by like age 24. I could give countless examples.For instance, I don't think LeBron now (recently 29) is nearly as athletic (speed, agility, quickness, jumping ability, etc) as 24 year old LeBron. Obviously, Lebron is still way at the top of the hierarchy in terms of athleticism. But, this dude is gone:
Athletic prime varies.