Hard Evidence That Ancient Egypt Was a Black Civilization Throughout It's Peak?

[HideoKojima]

@HideoKojima been listening to Black feminist on Twitter like a dumbass and they got him spouting incorrect information when it comes to ancient migration and archeology



All Africans come from East/Central Africa by way of the Wet Sahara where Africans were going back and forth from Niger to Egypt as hunter-gather types

When the Sahara began to dry Africans either went East or went West which is why predynastic Egypt was composed of 3 groups 1. Interior Africans from the dying Sahara (Niger Congo people) 2. Nilo Saharan/Chadic Cattle farmers 3. Afro Asiatic Puntland people

There is NO evidence of a great migration from West Asians into Egypt during dynastic times.

Furthermore, empires like Mali and Kanem Bornu were heavy trade partners with Egypt so there was cultural exchange going on during medieval times.

I'ma need a source on that because Ptolemaic Dynasty would like to speak to you. and how would you know if I got it from Black Feminists ????

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

No. It's because Ancient Egypt was the Greatest African Empire. Which is why white people tried to steal it to begin with. We know about Mali, Songhai, Punt, Kush/Nubia, Ghana, Zulu, Axum, Benin, etc. But Egypt was the Rome/Greece/Han China of Africa. Of course we focus on it. Besides West Africans came from East Africa. Ancient Egyptians spread out into Central, South and West Africa. Essentially all Africans are connected to it. There are no ancient West African empires or Central/South African empires.....nothing before Christ.....because we were all in the Nile Valley.

I've already shown this to be false......

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/13266437/

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/13266676/​

 

[HideoKojima]

I've already shown this to be false......

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/13266437/

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/13266676/​

thank you
/thread

 

[Poitier]

I'ma need a source on that because Ptolemaic Dynasty

You don't seem to know what Dynastic Egypt is...

I've already shown this to be false......

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/13266437/

http://www.thecoli.com/posts/13266676/​

This doesn't show anything to be false. No one said people were not in West Africa but they were nomadic people traveling East to West

 

[Hiphoplives4eva]

You're trying to claim a place you have no connections to. I don't descend from Ancient Egyptians, neither does any African American.

You're a moron. Please shut the hell up if you don't know what the fukk your talking about Cac.

 

[bouncy]

You don't seem to know what Dynastic Egypt is...



This doesn't show anything to be false. No one said people were not in West Africa but they were nomadic people traveling East to West

I was thinking the same thing!

People just like for anything to prove their point, even when it's just asinine.

I like to use common sense, and to me, if people were in east Africa, and we know Egypt is right next to other black areas, why wouldn't they mingle with them, and some of those people, along with AE, travel west to new land? If America as we know it, has been around over a couple of hundred years, and it looks significantly different from when it began, from people coming back and forth, why would AE be any different?

What I mean is, if the people of east Africa mingled, why wouldn't some of those people go west eventually, and start something new, while still having some things from AE, including DNA? It's not hard to believe, unless your mind is made up based on what you were taught from mainstream, racists teachings. It's like when it comes to black people, I noticed theories that would be acceptable for whites, all of a sudden because implausible when it comes to us. I'm constantly see this, not just history, but other regular shyt.

I really don't understand how people really think an empire so large as AE, only stayed to the east, and to the north with Europe. You mean to tell me they could build pyramids that are still around, and no one knows how they did it, but they couldn't go west to find new land for new resources?

This shyt builds up anger in me because people just let common sense go out of the window when it comes to history. They act like shyt happened in a few years, and base their arguments on that idea. shyt is so dumb.

 

[bouncy]

Edit: fukk it, I don't feel like hearing nonsense.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

This doesn't show anything to be false. No one said people were not in West Africa

Dude said there was no one in West Africa until after the 1st Century CE.

West Africans didn't come from East Africans. They SHARED ancestry with East Africans.

​

 

[bouncy]

Dude said there was no one in West Africa until after the 1st Century CE.

West Africans didn't come from East Africans. They SHARED ancestry with East Africans.

​

Well in that case, we all agree then. I thought you was implying there was no connection like that other troll is trying to say. My fault.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Well in that case, we all agree then. I thought you was implying there was no connection like that other troll is trying to say. My fault.

West Africans are related to East Africans in the same way that modern human beings are related to chimpanzees. This is not a slight to East Africans, but just an easier way to think about the connection.

West and East Africans have a common ancestor. When Egyptians traveled West, they encountered other people and civilizations that had been there for centuries.​

 

[bouncy]

West Africans are related to East Africans in the same way that modern human beings are related to chimpanzees. This is not a slight to East Africans, but just an easier way to think about the connection.

West and East Africans have a common ancestor. When Egyptians traveled West, they encountered other people and civilizations that had been there for centuries.​

Well we agree, except I feel the connection isn't so distant, as your east African, chimpanzee example. If man could walk to a place easily we did it, and because we have the ability to walk long distances off of very little food, this is what we did. This is what we do, we travel.

I don't feel it was a one way trip. If humans found new land with new resources, there is a good chance they went back to where they came, and built shelter between both places. That means a lot of fukking took place, and mixing of cultures. This is how Africa became populated, in my opinion. This is also, I think, is how AE came to be, all of these people came together to build something that united them all. We see this now here, and in other countries, and continents, why would ancient Africa be any different?

What's crazy is Africa is the only place that isn't connected

America has the U.S.a.(united states of America) Canada, is an offshoot of America, and Europe. Mexico has unity with Latin America. Europe has a union. Southeast Asia has commonality. Indian subcontinent, the same. Africa is the only continent where everything is divided up, even though the people are roughly the same.

 

[AJaRuleStan]

The problem with the assertion for "Ancient Egyptians were black" is that the variable "black" isn't clarified in this context. Is it being used to mean west Africans/Sub-Saharan? All Africans? Non-Caucasoid? Once that the classification is tightly defined we can begun to look in the right direction for the type of data we need to to draw valid conclusions.

 

[bouncy]

The problem with the assertion for "Ancient Egyptians were black" is that the variable "black" isn't clarified in this context. Is it being used to mean west Africans/Sub-Saharan? All Africans? Non-Caucasoid? Once that the classification is tightly defined we can begun to look in the right direction for the type of data we need to to draw valid conclusions.

True, but once you do that, you will lose because it was white supremacists who created the division in the first place. I don't think it's wise to play that game because it will be way easy for them to take credit. When scientists have called people who are no doubt what is considered black, by everyone in the world, Caucasian because of skull shape, you best believe they will find other ways to take credit.

You don't play the same game, a murderer plays, unless you want to be just as low down as him. You just learn his moves, and use it against him.

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Well we agree, except I feel the connection isn't so distant, as your east African, chimpanzee example. If man could walk to a place easily we did it, and because we have the ability to walk long distances off of very little food, this is what we did. This is what we do, we travel.
What's crazy is Africa is the only place that isn't connected

Well, imagine walking from California to New York. That might explain the 'disconnection'...........

 

[bouncy]

Well, imagine walking from California to New York. That might explain the 'disconnection'...........

It took this guy 6 1/2 months to walk to California from Delaware. He said for others it took 8-9 months.
http://www.natedamm.com/how-to-walk-across-america/
"How long does it take to walk across America?

It depends where you start and your pace. I was able to walk across in about 6 1/2 months of actual walking time. I know of people who have taken 8 or 9 months, or more. This is something you really won’t be able to figure out until you actually get out there and figure out what your pace is. Something to think about: Do you really want to plan anything around an estimation of time anyway? If you do, you’re really just setting yourself up for some pretty serious unnecessary stress.

Some people walk 12 miles per day, some walk 30. It really depends on a lot of things. For the first 1/3 of the trip I averaged about 13 miles a day. Then I made a crucial gear switch which I’ll mention in a couple of questions, and that immediately bumped up to 20+. For the last couple months of the walk, if I was walking, I was going at least 25 miles."

So, now you see why I think that's what happened.