ACCORDING TO 17TH CENTURY CAC ARTWORK, INDIANS IN THE AMERICAS LOOKED LIKE THIS??

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

Yet you bring no contemporary pictures that we can trust.

............They were posted by @The Dankster and destroyed any semblance of an argument you may have had.

YOU, on the other hand, are trying to prove Black people were here prior to Columbus by using badly painted caricatures created by racists who never laid eyes on the subjects of their artwork.

And yet, you trust them.........

Figures that you, being a liar, would believe liars.​

 

[Everythingg]

............Contemporary pictures won't show what people looked like BEFORE Europeans got here so your objection is retarded.​

Like I said, its funny to see you guys squirm around depictions from the 1500's to 1900's because you want to hold onto your cac narratives. Just like the other guy you'll also say there werent blacks ruling in Europe, Egypt was not "black", Israel was not black, and cacs are the reason that every black man is in the Americas. You'll probably even spout that most black people in America have white DNA in them lol

All cac BS lies of course and anybody that tries to pass them off as truth isnt worth a real conversation. So I just use you lame brehs as what you are, entertainment. Thanks breh

Spoiler

​

 

[satam55]

If Dark Skin makes you black are People from the country of India "Black"?

Breh go google "The Last Full-blooded Aztecs".

 

[TheBlackSun]

Umm yeah, the ORIGINAL native Americans were indeed black. Surprise surprise. We are already home, in our own land. Blacks have been on every continent since the beginning. As I asked before, where are the actual, TANGIBLE artifacts from these so-called slave ships? They can pull up pieces of the titanic, yet they cannot find one piece of the slave ships that "brought us here." Even MLK alluded to the black man as being "an exile in his own land."

 

[fairfax12]

Umm yeah, the ORIGINAL native Americans were indeed black. Surprise surprise. We are already home, in our own land. Blacks have been on every continent since the beginning. As I asked before, where are the actual, TANGIBLE artifacts from these so-called slave ships? They can pull up pieces of the titanic, yet they cannot find one piece of the slave ships that "brought us here." Even MLK alluded to the black man as being "an exile in his own land."

So you're denying the trans atlantic slave trade was ever a thing?

 

[Dafunkdoc_Unlimited]

So you're denying the trans atlantic slave trade was ever a thing?

Breh, you're arguing with a dude that doesn't understand the difference between metal and wood.​

 

[TheBlackSun]

So you're denying the trans atlantic slave trade was ever a thing?

Think long and hard about it. White folks have went and dug up every last artifact that mother earth has hidden in her ass, but they can't find any, ANY remnants of the slave ships? I don't even ever hearing about remnants of slave ships washing up on our shores years later. All they have to show for is a replica; which sits someone in a museum in Britain, and a diagram drawing of all the slaves being nested together. This also ties into us being called "African Americans." It was a term coined in the 1960's, during the civil rights era. Before, blacks here in America were never associated with being from Africa. None of my grandparents, nor their grandparents ever mentioned their genealogy coming from Africa, slave ships, or being called African Americans. Simply being "colored" "Negroes" and of course we know the other - "Nigg*rs.

 

[TheBlackSun]

Like I said, its funny to see you guys squirm around depictions from the 1500's to 1900's because you want to hold onto your cac narratives. Just like the other guy you'll also say there werent blacks ruling in Europe, Egypt was not "black", Israel was not black, and cacs are the reason that every black man is in the Americas. You'll probably even spout that most black people in America have white DNA in them lol

All cac BS lies of course and anybody that tries to pass them off as truth isnt worth a real conversation. So I just use you lame brehs as what you are, entertainment. Thanks breh

Spoiler

​

This is what truly being WOKE is. Not that fake bullshyt like all these other negros keep running around naming themselves.

 

[TheBlackSun]

Spoiler

Spoiler

Spoiler

Sure thing bud, everyone black is "African"

​

1. Yea all the paintings in this thread are inaccurate. Where are the "accurate" ones?

2. Never an argument I made.

Dread lock mummies in Peru. But that will be cast aside too I know. Its just fun toying with you false slave narrative holders

Funny thing is, Africans know who we really are, but we don't. If you ever call hem black, they'll be quick to remind you that you are NOT one of them.

 

[TheBlackSun]

Real talk tho, this is probably one of the best threads Ive been in in a while, Lots of good, well researched information, and laughs.

 

[Everythingg]

This is what truly being WOKE is. Not that fake bullshyt like all these other negros keep running around naming themselves.

Funny thing is, Africans know who we really are, but we don't. If you ever call hem black, they'll be quick to remind you that you are NOT one of them.

No doubt breh

But not all "Africans" are "African"

There were "Indians" taken to places in Europe and Africa so we're definitely spread out. But I agree, alotta Africans be giving blacks in the Americas the side eye. But they also do it to other Africans so its probably more of a tribal thing.

 

[TheProfessor]

No doubt breh

But not all "Africans" are "African"

There were "Indians" taken to places in Europe and Africa so we're definitely spread out. But I agree, alotta Africans be giving blacks in the Americas the side eye. But they also do it to other Africans so its probably more of a tribal thing.

It's because they have been brainwashed by whites just like we were brainwashed.

 

[fairfax12]

It's because they have been brainwashed by whites just like we were brainwashed.

Yea. they fail to see how their aversion to 'being African' is pretty racist and wild on its face. People with bad intentions used the fact we are a people without a known homeland in this country.

 

[YouMadd?]

 

[YouMadd?]

You posting the worship smiley not even knowing how badly you killed your own argument.

How you going to claim that California Indians "in general" looked like Negros in 1874 when we have HUNDREDS of photos of them and they don't look like Negroes?

That PROVES that the White people you quoting are ignorant and full of shyt, and can't tell the difference between a Native and a Negro.

How can you defend that ANY of these photos show Negroes? These aren't half-assed paintings by ignorant cacs who had never been to America, these are pictures of the REAL PEOPLE from the EXACT TIME PERIOD as your fukking quote.

Paiute Indians from 1850

1859 picture of Arapaho women in the Yosemite region

1860 photo of California Indian girls:

Pomo basket weavers in the 1860s

Yosemite Indians in the 1860s

Shoshone leader from 1870

Yosemite people around 1870

Shoshone from 1870

Maiman, a Mojave in 1871

Paiutes in 1872

More Paiute in 1872

Paiutes in 1873

Indian soldiers during the Modok war of 1873

Paiutes from 1874

Pimos in 1875


"low stature" - check

"dark brown color" - check

"matted bushy hair" - check

"large projecting lips" - well, from a white guy's perspective, check

"broad flat noses" - check


Look like Negroes? Oh HELL NO.


Your White man said that California Indians in 1874 IN GENERAL looked like Negroes.


Pictures prove that California Indians from all over did NOT look like Negroes.


They just look that way to a racist White guy who can't tell the difference.

And you still for the descriptions of random white racists who didn't know what the fukk they were talking about.

Clearly I think this thread isn't saying ALL indians were like "negroes"... Its possible... quite possible, for more than one phenotype to exist in my opinion, and I believe that is what a lot of these theorists would say as well. The theory is that there were two types, a more mongol looking tribe, and a darker "negro" looking set. A lot early artwork depicted both.

For example. An indian from Peru looked completely different from an indian from northern Canada... just my 2 cents. Great photos by the way.

"OHLONE CEREMONIAL DANCE AT MISSION SAN JOSE"

"INDIANS FISHING IN SAN FRANCISCO"

" Indians hunting in the bay of San Francisco, California, engraving by Jean Augustin Franquelin (1789-1839) from Picturesque voyages around the world, by Louis Choris (1795-1828), 1822, from the expedition of 1815-1818 led by Otto von Kotzebue (1787-1846). North America, 19th century. Vincennes, Castello Service Historique De La Marine Bibliotheque Historique Centrale De La Marine (Photo by DeAgostini/Getty Images)"
http://www.gettyimages.com/license/164076603