WW3: China-Japan tension over disputed islands takes to the sky

[Serious]

Chinese and Japanese fighter planes tailed each other over a disputed cluster of uninhabited islands in the East China Sea, raising alarm that a miscalculation could set off an armed confrontation.

Chinese military authorities ordered two J-10 fighter planes to perform what China called “verification and monitoring” on Friday after a Chinese transport plane was tailed by Japanese F-15 fighter jets. The incident above the islands, known as Senkaku to the Japanese and Diaoyu to the Chinese, was the most potentially dangerous in months of escalating tensions over the islands.

"Japanese military aircraft have been increasingly active in closely scouting Chinese aircraft. The activity zone of Japanese military aircraft has also expanded recently, which is the root cause of security disputes concerning territorial waters and airspace between the two countries," the official New China News Agency quoted a military official saying Friday. "The Chinese military will be on high alert, and China will resolutely protect the security of its air defense force and uphold its legitimate rights."

A long-standing disagreement over the islands flared in September when the Japanese government purchased some of the territory from a private Japanese owner, in effect nationalizing it. Since then, China has asserted its claim to the islands by sending ships, and more recently planes, into the region. On Dec. 13, the Japanese Defense Ministry announced that a Chinese plane had intruded into its airspace for the first time since at least 1958.

"There is far more at stake here than a small cluster of islands. Crisis-mitigation mechanisms need to be urgently reinstated and communication increased between Beijing and Tokyo to reduce the risks of an accidental clash or escalation," warned Stephanie Kleine-Ahlbrandt, China and Northeast Asia project director for the International Crisis Group, in an editorial last week.

The standoff comes just as Beijing and Tokyo have installed more nationalistic governments. On Friday, Japan’s hawkish new prime minister, Shinzo Abe, promised not to compromise on the islands.

"My resolve to defend our waters and territories has not changed at all," Abe said at a news conference in Tokyo. "There's no room for negotiations.’’

The largest of the islands is inhabited by feral goats and is considered unsuitable for permanent human habitation, but the surrounding waters are thought to be rich in gas and oil reserves.

China-Japan tension over disputed islands takes to the sky - latimes.com

the enemy of my enemy is my friend

These cats really do hate each other

 

[PremierDaTruth]

Japan is with us right, so if they start going at it that means.......

 

[Serious]

Japan is with us right, so if they start going at it that means.......

we don't have to pay china the debt back we owe

?

 

[the cac mamba]

i thought we didnt let japan have a military

 

[PremierDaTruth]

we don't have to pay china the debt back we owe

?

I meant could it potentally pop things off with the US and China?

 

[Serious]

I meant could it potentally pop things off with the US and China?

Meh knowing the U.S., "theoretically", if tension were to "pop off", America would probably try to take as neutral of a stance as possible, while low key supplying Japan(both sides if feasible, doubt China would need supplies)...

But more than likely nothing will come of this incident

 

[num123]

i thought we didnt let japan have a military

We dont, but we let them have a "Self Defense Force", which although small, is one of the most advanced in the world.

 

[Serious]

i thought we didnt let japan have a military

Q&A: Japan's Self Defence Force
Graphic BBC
The Japanese Government wants to help the US in its military campaign against terrorism but to do so it needs to make changes to laws which limit the role of its forces to the narrowest definition of self defense.

BBC News | ASIA-PACIFIC | Q&A: Japan's Self Defence Force

 

[88m3]

i thought we didnt let japan have a military

They are trying to get one again now. I think it has to do with their constitution. They currently have a defense force.

 

[Patrick Kane]

Nothing will happen, as usual. It's not 1940 anymore.

 

[MidniteJay]

Nothing will happen, as usual. It's not 1940 anymore.

Yeah, nobody is gung-ho for full blown wars anymore. It's all with everybody until some kind of compromise is met.

 

[jackswstd]

Over some fukkin islands? :stupid:

 

[Piff Perkins]

The dangerous thing about this is the possibility of some accident or miscalculation sparking a larger confrontation. No one wants a big war - it's impractical in the 21st century and would hurt multiple economies. So in the grand scheme of things, both governments don't want no beef. But all it takes is one dumbass pilot to take a shot or make a mistake and boom...

Aggression wouldn't be long term, I'd imagine the US and Russia would be able to get both sides to agree to a cease fire before anything major happened