I haven't really gone in on this subject too much, but I see a lot of people that seem to misunderstand why we (and many other nations) end up with a two-party political system. People tend to blame things such as corruption, stupid voters, the media, corporations, etc.
But in truth, the reason we get stuck with two parties is much simpler. It's also much more insidious and more difficult to deal with. We use what's called a first-past-the-post voting system. It's a very simple concept, it just means that the candidate with the most votes wins the election. One vote, one person. This seems like a simple and commonsense concept, but over time it pretty much ALWAYS results in a two-party system, even if voters are completely rational. Why? Well, like I said, the answer will scare some people, but the reason is none other than -
The short explanation is that people abandon weaker parties on the basis that they have no chance of winning. Here's a short video (one I'd suggest everyone checks out) that gives a really good explanation -
So my point here isn't that I'm against 3rd-party voting or anything like that, but I think people should be realistic. Even if Green Party candidates, Libertarian Party candidates, etc., were allowed in national debates, it'd still probably come down to Republicans vs. Democrats. The voting system would have to be fundamentally changed (in ways that some people may be uncomfortable with) for the result to be any different.
But in truth, the reason we get stuck with two parties is much simpler. It's also much more insidious and more difficult to deal with. We use what's called a first-past-the-post voting system. It's a very simple concept, it just means that the candidate with the most votes wins the election. One vote, one person. This seems like a simple and commonsense concept, but over time it pretty much ALWAYS results in a two-party system, even if voters are completely rational. Why? Well, like I said, the answer will scare some people, but the reason is none other than -
Math.
The short explanation is that people abandon weaker parties on the basis that they have no chance of winning. Here's a short video (one I'd suggest everyone checks out) that gives a really good explanation -
So my point here isn't that I'm against 3rd-party voting or anything like that, but I think people should be realistic. Even if Green Party candidates, Libertarian Party candidates, etc., were allowed in national debates, it'd still probably come down to Republicans vs. Democrats. The voting system would have to be fundamentally changed (in ways that some people may be uncomfortable with) for the result to be any different.