White people aren't driving growth in the suburbs

Joined
May 10, 2012
Messages
19,388
Reputation
6,301
Daps
42,733
R.I.P., White Suburbia


White People Aren't Driving Growth in the Suburbs
The decline of white suburbia has already begun.

Twilight has reached white suburbia.

The next two decades will see a profound shift in the racial makeup of America’s suburbs. Or rather, an even more profound shift. It’s all happening now, according to Bill Frey, the author of Diversity Explosion.

For the Brookings Institution, Frey explains that white populations accounted for just 9 percent of the population growth of the suburbs (in the 100 largest metro areas) between 2000 and 2010. The Metropolitan Policy Program at Brookings just launched a fascinating map that shows where white cities and suburbs gained and lost populations. It shows that some metro areas are already breaking from the population pattern that has fueled the last half-century of growth: white losses in cities, white gains in suburbs.

41607d632.jpg

Now, that classic 20th-century pattern still holds true in some places, including Dallas and San Antonio, Kansas City and St. Louis, and Minneapolis and Detroit. And several large metro areas posted white gains in both cities and suburbs, namely Seattle, Portland, Austin, and several cities across North and South Carolina.

But that pattern isn’t destined to last for long. One-third of large metro-area suburbs witnessed declines in their white populations, with the largest losses in suburbs surrounding New York, Los Angeles, and San Francisco. More metro areas will follow in this coastal vein than in the one of recent white-suburban growth seen in the Sun Belt.

“Whites are hardly the lifeblood of suburban growth anymore,” Frey writes.

Looking ahead to 2030, the Urban Institute sees white population losses nearly everywhere. Earlier this year, a number of researchers published a comprehensive report on growth projections between 2010 and 2030. They focused on four specific commuting zones: Atlanta; Las Vegas; Youngstown, Ohio; and Washington, D.C. (The Economic Research Service identifies commuting zones as geographic units that cross urban, suburban, and county boundaries to represent local economies.)

964166bb7.png

(Urban Institute)
Absolute growth isn’t even in the cards for all four commuting zones: The white population in Youngstown is predicted to shrink substantially by 2030, and much faster than other populations can replace it. But in the D.C., Vegas, and Atlanta commuting zones, white populations will continue to grow—just at much lower rates than Hispanic or black populations.

So the share of the white population in the larger D.C. region (including its Maryland and Virginia suburbs) will shrink by maybe 6 percent. The black population may shrink by 6 percent as well. But the Hispanic population and non-Hispanic-other populations will enjoy some sweet growth: 6 and 7 percent, respectively.

The figures for the Atlanta and Vegas commuting zones are eye-popping. The share of the white population of Atlanta and its suburbs is predicted to decline by nearly 17 percent. The share of the white population in the Vegas commuting zone may fall by 15 percent. (Another way to put it: The share of minorities living in the Atlanta and Las Vegas areas may rise 16.5 and 15.2 percent, respectively.)

Americans figured out years ago that America is growing more diverse, fueled by population growth among young minority families. What we see now is that the suburbs—long the province of white families—are growing more diverse, too. Cities across the nation will face new political and economic challenges as suburbs grow poorer and as whites adjust to (or rebel against) their new neighbors.
 

Poitier

My Words Law
Supporter
Joined
Jul 30, 2013
Messages
69,411
Reputation
15,449
Daps
246,375
ut in the D.C., Vegas, and Atlanta commuting zones, white populations will continue to grow—just at much lower rates than Hispanic or black populations.

So the share of the white population in the larger D.C. region (including its Maryland and Virginia suburbs) will shrink by maybe 6 percent. The black population may shrink by 6 percent as well. But the Hispanic population and non-Hispanic-other populations will enjoy some sweet growth: 6 and 7 percent, respectively.

The figures for the Atlanta and Vegas commuting zones are eye-popping. The share of the white population of Atlanta and its suburbs is predicted to decline by nearly 17 percent. The share of the white population in the Vegas commuting zone may fall by 15 percent. (Another way to put it: The share of minorities living in the Atlanta and Las Vegas areas may rise 16.5 and 15.2 percent, respectively.)

:dj2:
 

hashmander

Hale End
Supporter
Joined
Jan 17, 2013
Messages
19,286
Reputation
4,645
Daps
82,423
Reppin
The Arsenal
i'd rather black growth in cities not suburbs. white people were always stupid for abandoning cities and setting up shop in suburbs. in cities you have access to more services, etc. suburban sprawl is a disease and is just ugly. poverty and the suburbs just don't mix, you become out of sight out of mind.

more "live, work, play" communities please.
 

Originalman

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 15, 2014
Messages
47,127
Reputation
12,160
Daps
204,813
Can't say this is a 100% good thing. Young whites are moving into cities, and pushing black people to the suburbs. Same gentrification, different playbook.

Bingo....we see that shyt happening on chicago and Dallas.
 

Red Shield

Global Domination
Joined
Dec 17, 2013
Messages
21,404
Reputation
2,481
Daps
47,596
Reppin
.0001%
i'd rather black growth in cities not suburbs. white people were always stupid for abandoning cities and setting up shop in suburbs. in cities you have access to more services, etc. suburban sprawl is a disease and is just ugly. poverty and the suburbs just don't mix, you become out of sight out of mind.

more "live, work, play" communities please.

Basically.

Once blacks get pushed to the suburbs and rural areas... that's a wrap pretty much.
 

the next guy

Superstar
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
39,443
Reputation
1,543
Daps
37,646
Reppin
NULL
i'd rather black growth in cities not suburbs. white people were always stupid for abandoning cities and setting up shop in suburbs. in cities you have access to more services, etc. suburban sprawl is a disease and is just ugly. poverty and the suburbs just don't mix, you become out of sight out of mind.

more "live, work, play" communities please.
Yup, and look what happened. Cities in europe rebuilt while american has dead zones in each of it's major cities or whole cities under the gun. It's a shame.
 
Joined
May 26, 2012
Messages
4,375
Reputation
1,915
Daps
15,232
Reppin
Oakland
I see that they're doubling us in growth rate :mjcry:

Mexicans/Hispanics from south of the border are the biggest direct threat to blacks in america. They compete with us for all immediate resources and now they dominate us population wise.

And it's only gonna get worse thanks to that fakkit obama :pacspit:
 

Wild self

The Black Man will prosper!
Supporter
Joined
Jun 20, 2012
Messages
82,092
Reputation
11,883
Daps
222,144
Well, I hope automation comes in and wipes out a lot of white collar jobs, thus eliminating the need to commute to go to work. As long as black folk actually OWN their property, I can't see that as a bad thing. Besides, in the age of AMAZON, more malls are closing down and shopping centers are steady declining.

Burbs are for the people who want peace and quiet. Can't see myself wanting to be in a middle of a loud ass city after a certain age and living there.
 
Top