Which scenario would create more fukkery: Hall n Nash as commentary or Ed Ferrara n Vince Russo book

LastManStanding

Veteran
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Messages
31,098
Reputation
6,079
Daps
143,387
Russo says "check my stats" :sas2:

LOL1.gif
 

CM_Burns

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
21,823
Reputation
-114
Daps
33,756
Reppin
NULL
Both would be incredible. I'd rather see Russo and Ferrara with the book though, Hall and Nash might get repetitive after a month or two.
 

XannyWarbucks

Superstar
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
4,061
Reputation
642
Daps
18,616
Why do people forget that Russo had the book in TNA for the majority of his time there? His writing is stuck in 1998-99, and by 99' it was getting corny as shyt. Dude didn't do shyt in WCW and his big angle was the worst incarnation of the NWO.
What they do need is someone unknown, like what Russo was, who could think outside of the box. They also need a Rock or Austin to make it work, because good writing isn't going to move anything with the lukewarm roster WWE has today. None of those guys have any drive-- they're just happy to be there because it was their dream, or to begrudgingly collect a paycheck.

As for Nash and Hall, sure. From what I remember, the commentary was never good. Might as well have two people laugh and make fun of everything. It made that NXT season with the women worth watching.
 
Top