Which scenario would create more fukkery: Hall n Nash as commentary or Ed Ferrara n Vince Russo book

LastManStanding

Veteran
Joined
Oct 26, 2013
Messages
30,545
Reputation
6,019
Daps
141,036
Russo says "check my stats" :sas2:

LOL1.gif
 

CM_Burns

Superstar
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
20,937
Reputation
-164
Daps
32,474
Reppin
NULL
Both would be incredible. I'd rather see Russo and Ferrara with the book though, Hall and Nash might get repetitive after a month or two.
 

XannyWarbucks

Superstar
Joined
Dec 18, 2017
Messages
4,021
Reputation
632
Daps
18,419
Why do people forget that Russo had the book in TNA for the majority of his time there? His writing is stuck in 1998-99, and by 99' it was getting corny as shyt. Dude didn't do shyt in WCW and his big angle was the worst incarnation of the NWO.
What they do need is someone unknown, like what Russo was, who could think outside of the box. They also need a Rock or Austin to make it work, because good writing isn't going to move anything with the lukewarm roster WWE has today. None of those guys have any drive-- they're just happy to be there because it was their dream, or to begrudgingly collect a paycheck.

As for Nash and Hall, sure. From what I remember, the commentary was never good. Might as well have two people laugh and make fun of everything. It made that NXT season with the women worth watching.
 
Top