What was the point of the Intercontinental Championship?

desjardins

Superstar
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
16,486
Reputation
904
Daps
61,057
Reppin
Mustard Island
Disclaimer: I ain't watch wrestling consistently since the early to mid 90s. I occasionally watch AEW now days to see Ms.Jade remain undefeated

What was the point of having an intercontinental championship back in the day.
I remember dudes like Mr.Perfect and other non jobbers getting the belt and as a kid I basically viewed it as a JV belt. Was it just that simple or is it more nuanced than that?
Like does an intercontinental champion get some kind of preference for World Championship title shots or something
 
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
177,713
Reputation
22,346
Daps
582,233
Reppin
49ers..Braves..Celtics
The kayfabe point of it was always "higher place on the card" which meant "more money" or "a larger purse" depending on who was doing the commentating. It would also mean that you are in the world title mix. They didn't do title vs. title matches often but usually once a guy lost the I.C. title he'd then end up getting a world title shot.

The real reason was

1. They had different touring schedules at their peak. The I.C. champion whether it was Pedro Morales or Macho Man etc.. could headline the B-show. It allowed them to put on more shows per year and more revenue.

2. The belt was something for the guys to go after and theoretically if you got up to that point in the card then you probably would make more money because you'd be main eventing house shows and you'd probably be selling more merchandise once merchandise became a big factor in the 80s.
 

desjardins

Superstar
Joined
Nov 3, 2015
Messages
16,486
Reputation
904
Daps
61,057
Reppin
Mustard Island
The kayfabe point of it was always "higher place on the card" which meant "more money" or "a larger purse" depending on who was doing the commentating. It would also mean that you are in the world title mix. They didn't do title vs. title matches often but usually once a guy lost the I.C. title he'd then end up getting a world title shot.

The real reason was

1. They had different touring schedules at their peak. The I.C. champion whether it was Pedro Morales or Macho Man etc.. could headline the B-show. It allowed them to put on more shows per year and more revenue.

2. The belt was something for the guys to go after and theoretically if you got up to that point in the card then you probably would make more money because you'd be main eventing house shows and you'd probably be selling more merchandise once merchandise became a big factor in the 80s.
Thanks for the reply. So basically it was a means to make certain wrestlers more marketable and set them up for a bigger stage.
 

jadillac

Veteran
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
54,292
Reputation
8,541
Daps
165,953
Disclaimer: I ain't watch wrestling consistently since the early to mid 90s. I occasionally watch AEW now days to see Ms.Jade remain undefeated

What was the point of having an intercontinental championship back in the day.
I remember dudes like Mr.Perfect and other non jobbers getting the belt and as a kid I basically viewed it as a JV belt. Was it just that simple or is it more nuanced than that?
Like does an intercontinental champion get some kind of preference for World Championship title shots or something

What's the point? What you mean?

How dare you disrespect the "hot & steamy night Pat Patterson had in Rio" when he became the first ever IC champ.

Lol.

But nah it's pretty much what @Eric Brooks said
 

Crude

Superstar
Joined
Jun 13, 2019
Messages
11,403
Reputation
2,708
Daps
55,035
The kayfabe point of it was always "higher place on the card" which meant "more money" or "a larger purse" depending on who was doing the commentating. It would also mean that you are in the world title mix. They didn't do title vs. title matches often but usually once a guy lost the I.C. title he'd then end up getting a world title shot.

The real reason was

1. They had different touring schedules at their peak. The I.C. champion whether it was Pedro Morales or Macho Man etc.. could headline the B-show. It allowed them to put on more shows per year and more revenue.

2. The belt was something for the guys to go after and theoretically if you got up to that point in the card then you probably would make more money because you'd be main eventing house shows and you'd probably be selling more merchandise once merchandise became a big factor in the 80s.
I’ll also add it is sometime used as a trial run to see how upper card to upper mid card guys are received as champion to see if they can be the top guy.
 
Top