That’s me sir. What’s your beef?
Did you read the article or just get involved in Twitter outrage?no beef you personally,,,CS just looks lil
Fellow writer looks funny with that headline…they got backlash n deleted it
It wasn't brodie. Dude that wrote the article made the comparison based on the presentation vince nem giving. No malice in the article at allno beef you personally,,,CS just looks lil
Fellow writer looks funny with that headline…they got backlash n deleted it
Did you read the article or just get involved in Twitter outrage?
It wasn't brodie. Dude that wrote the article made the comparison based on the presentation vince nem giving. No malice in the article at all
That’s not at all what the article said. That’s the point.so every big black guy is the next mark Henry ….if they weren’t wrong why did they delete it…the headline is what people were talkn about
She didn’t tweet it. Also she doesn’t run CS. No one who tweeted their outrage had an issue with the article because they didn’t read it. They assumed the comparison was made on race and it definitely wasn’t.Ow I know I was talkn about the headline of it…CS is ran by a white lady so I was
That's the real issueThat’s not at all what the article said. That’s the point.
the article specifically pointed to the fact they dress him like Mark, the commentary team presents him like they presented mark (powerlifting background) and the man uses the worlds strongest slam as his finisher.
he wasn’t saying because this guy is big and black he’s mark henry. He’s saying Vince is presenting him in a very similar light. Eerily similar.
Now we can have a convo about Vince being lazy as fukk and repackaging shyt from one brother to the next and the company’s shady history with race. But the writer isn’t racist for seeing what WWE is laying down and pointing it out
Exactly. They put us in boxes. If you’re similar to someone that came before then let’s do that.That's the real issue
She didn’t tweet it. Also she doesn’t run CS. No one who tweeted their outrage had an issue with the article because they didn’t read it. They assumed the comparison was made on race and it definitely wasn’t.
Nah you good. I’m just speaking my peace cause the shyt frustrated me earlier. So many people reacted to a tweet instead of reading an article. That shyt annoyed me. If any of the hundred or so people who decided to rail against the shyt actually read the article, they’d know exactly why the headline is there and the context. But that’s not the world we live in.u know what I find odd…that she took her SN out of CS bio…it used to say account ran by stella_cheeks
I’m not attacking u at all…