We need a OBJECTIVE RATING SYSTEM (Calling Chicks Dimes...smh)

[Fredrick Thuglas]

I know its not a big deal to some of yall and I know a rating is always gonna be subjective everywhere else but can we make a scaling system here on the coli for some type of consistency?

I get annoyed when I read a thread/post where people talk about how good/bad a chick looks and throwing out random numbers.

Coli Poster: "she's a 8"
Real nikka: *clicks on link*
Real nikka:
Coli Poster:

Official Coli Rating System​

(0-2) Face
(0-2) Chest
(0-2) Ass
(0-2) Weight
(0-2) Shape

Give a 0=below average, give a 1=mediocre, give a 2=above average.​

Why "weight"? (some times a chick might have a body but she is a sandwhich away from being )
Why "Shape"? (Some times a chick might be a little heavy but she still has an hour glass shape like Tocarra)

Add all five numbers up and thats her score out of 10.

 

[WaveCapsByOscorp™]

taste is never a matter of objective observation...

 

[Premeditated]

sounds reasonable

you should make a rating system on what makes a pawg too.

 

[DaChampIsHere]

How about

"DAMN!"

"Looks good"

"Ugly"

Boom. Problem solved simpleton.

 

[Soundbwoy]

beauty is in the eye of the beholder


I approve this message

 

[Fredrick Thuglas]

sounds reasonable

you should make a rating system on what makes a pawg too.

I never thought of that...the word PAWG gets thrown around way too much. It kinda lost meaning to me. I'll give it some thought.

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

In college we had a 2 question rating system that pretty much covered everything. No need to get too sophisticated. Since there's such varying opinions here it might even be better suited for this place since we're all spread out. A dime in Indiana might not be a dime in Florida. It's like the currency exchange or something.

Anyways, we broke it down like this...

1) Yes or no? Would you smash? Simple as that.

2) More or less? Now do we need to see more of that or less of that?

2nd question is where it got interesting because just because you would smash a chick doesn't mean we need to see more of that.

The "yes and less" as we called them might have a really fat ass but nothing else going for her.

I can only think of one "no and more". This chick had great features but none of them went together . But I wouldn't have minded seeing more pretty eyes, nice figures, perfect teeth and everything else she offered.

But I'm already programmed to deduct at least 2 to 3 points from any chick the coli links me to.

 

[Sierra Mist]

The whole number thing is stupid.

 

[Fredrick Thuglas]

taste is never a matter of objective observation...

beauty is in the eye of the beholder


I approve this message

That's why I said the Rating System should be objective. So that even if we agree we will know how they came up with the number.

 

[ThugLife]

It's your OPINION that we need this system

 

[Fredrick Thuglas]

In college we had a 2 question rating system that pretty much covered everything. No need to get too sophisticated. Since there's such varying opinions here it might even be better suited for this place since we're all spread out. A dime in Indiana might not be a dime in Florida. It's like the currency exchange or something.

Anyways, we broke it down like this...

1) Yes or no? Would you smash? Simple as that.

2) More or less? Now do we need to see more of that or less of that?

2nd question is where it got interesting because just because you would smash a chick doesn't mean we need to see more of that.

The "yes and less" as we called them might have a really fat ass but nothing else going for her.

I can only think of one "no and more". This chick had great features but none of them went together.

But I'm already programmed to deduct at least 2 to 3 points from any chick the coli links me to.

I don't agree with this...lets be real, MOST nikkas will smash anything that was born a female as long as its still breathing.

Everything will be Yes/less or Yes/More which doesn't really say much.

my system is simple, five questions. Face, Breast, Booty, Shape and Weight. Just add it up. Nothing too complicated.

 

[Boolean]

theres probably less than 5 objective things in this world/universe and beauty isn't one of them

 

[Jesus Shuttlesworth]

I don't agree with this...lets be real, MOST nikkas will smash anything that was born a female as long as its still breathing.

Everything will be Yes/less or Yes/More which doesn't really say much.

my system is simple, five questions. Face, Breast, Booty, Shape and Weight. Just add it up. Nothing too complicated.

That's why the 2nd question is so important. If it's a LESS they need to stop posting pics like that.

 

[nalej]

For coli the judging system is more simple like

I'd fukk

or

Burn with fire

 

[god shamgod]

NO you don't

Looks are subjective some nikkas like t*ts and faces or legs,hips and ass or all of that.I base it of what Im attracted to.

A chick who's funny or has personality will always be more attractive to me than a real,real pretty chick wit the personality of a doorknob despite her not looking as good