Was there ever an explanation for the awful track listing for the Bulletproof Wallets CD?

[Regular_P]

I was just ripping this CD so I can put it on my phone and reminded of how bonkers the track listing is. shyt doesn't match up AT ALL. How the fukk did this happen?

This is what it actually is on the CD:

1. Intro
2. Maxine
3. Flowers
4. Never Be The Same Again
5. Teddy Skit
6. Theodore
7. Ghost Showers
8. Strawberry
9. The Forest
10. The Juks
11. Walking Through The Darkness
12. Jealousy
13. The Hilton
14. Interlude
15. Love Session
16. Street Chemistry

 

[Doodle]

It's a common thing with Wu albums. Liquid Swords was the same way. I don't know why.

 

[Buckeye Fever]

Never Be the Same Again is a top 5 song to play when a bytch cheats on you

 

[Regular_P]

Never Be the Same Again is a top 5 song to play when a bytch cheats on you

 

[BuddahMAC]

Part of it was them using an early tracklist from before some of the songs were pulled for sample clearance and the final version was changed, but I think some of it was someone at Sony/Razor Sharp/Starks Enterprise who just kept submitting the wrong info to the people who print up the booklets b/c the same shyt happened on SC & Ironman (Box in Hand is not Box in Hand).

For example, most people know about Supreme Clientele & the mix-up of the US & Canadian versions but lesser known is the physical booklet of the US version matches the Canadian version and the physical version of the Canadian version matches the US tracklisting (even though there's still mistakes like the remade version Ghost Dieni isn't credited to RZA for the beat).

 

[ℒℴѵℯJay ELECTUA]

Sample clearances ruined it from being a classic.

 

[KravenMorehead™]

Someone made an OG tracklisting version online and I wish the songs blended accordingly

 

[Sonic Boom of the South]

My CD back cover was nothing like that and was correct

 

[Malcy86]

Something that happens a fair bit that makes you wonder how they get on the shelves with loads of errors. Had never seen this though.

Did anyone else's version of Kurupt's Streets Iz A Mutha have all mentions of Xzibit as 'ZIZBIT'?!

 

[Regular_P]

My CD back cover was nothing like that and was correct

When did you buy it? I got my copy when it dropped.

 

[Taadow]

My CD back cover was nothing like that and was correct

So was mine...

 

[DaveyDave]

It's a common thing with Wu albums. Liquid Swords was the same way. I don't know why.

Liquid Swords is that way on purpose tho, it told a little story using all the song titles. It was supposed to be like a chapter and verse from the bible kind of thing that’s why it has 4:13 Wu Tang Manual at the end. 4:13 most likely isn’t the real number just an example.

 

[DaveyDave]

Something that happens a fair bit that makes you wonder how they get on the shelves with loads of errors. Had never seen this though.

Did anyone else's version of Kurupt's Streets Iz A Mutha have all mentions of Xzibit as 'ZIZBIT'?!

I vaguely remember another spelling error or song out of order in Streetz as well. It happened on my copy of Rhythmalism too, there was a section somewhere in the middle where the songs didn’t match the track listing at all

 

[Malcy86]

I vaguely remember another spelling error or song out of order in Streetz as well. It happened on my copy of Rhythmalism too, there was a section somewhere in the middle where the songs didn’t match the track listing at all

Never Gonna Give It Up has 2 seconds of silence near the end while Nate Dogg is singing the hook.

 

[Red]

Ironman (Box in Hand is not Box in Hand).

I've known this since the dsc days but what I've never known is what the correct title for that track is. Everywhere just calls it box in hand. Do you know what it's original /correct title is?