Want to Avoid Fiscal Cliff? End Sports Welfare

Walt

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
11,338
Reputation
12,099
Daps
69,636
Want stop the fiscal cliff from advancing? Cut welfare to sports. | SportsonEarth.com : Patrick Hruby Article

According to Harvard professor Judith Grant Long and economist Andrew Zimbalist, the average public contribution to the total capital and operating cost per sports stadium from 2000 to 2006 was between $249 and $280 million. A fantastic interactive map at Deadspin estimates that the total cost to the public of the 78 pro stadiums built or renovated between 1991 and 2004 was nearly $16 billion. That’s enough to build three Nimitz-class nuclear-powered aircraft carriers. Or fund, in today’s dollars, 15 Saturn V moon rocket launches -- three more than the number of launches in the entire Apollo/Skylab program. It’s also more than what Chrysler received in the Great Recession-triggered auto industry bailout ($10.5 billion), and bigger than the 2010 GDP of 84 different nations. How does this happen? Simple. Team owners ask for public handouts and threaten to move elsewhere unless they get them, pitting cities against in each other in corporate welfare bidding wars -- wars rooted in the various publicly-granted antitrust exemptions that effectively allow sports leagues to control and maintain a limited supply of teams to be leveraged against widespread demand.

“It’s like this magic alchemy where we take all this public money and it morphs into private profit,” says Dave Zirin, author of “Bad Sports: How Owners are Ruining the Games We Love.” “The most egregious example of this is the Seattle Sonics going from the fourth biggest market in the country to Oklahoma City, a market that has one-eighth or one-sixteenth of the per capita income. Why did that move make sense? One place offered corporate welfare and another didn’t. The NBA punished a city for not giving them hundreds of millions of dollars.”
 

mastermind

Rest In Power Kobe
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
63,305
Reputation
6,237
Daps
167,927
you could replace sports welfare with corporate welfare and it would make an even greater impact.


but yeah, the Sports welfare system has been terrible for America's communities. Its a huge drain on America.
 

KOTK

Pro
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
2,421
Reputation
-20
Daps
1,117
Bill Simmons said:
How about you fukkin' ask those fukkin' Sonics fans in fukkin' Seattle whther they'd rather have a bit more fukkin' debt or their fukkin' basketball team back?
:leon:

Nice rebuttal.
 

unit321

Hong Kong Phooey
Joined
May 2, 2012
Messages
22,214
Reputation
1,815
Daps
23,103
Reppin
USA
Yeah, the Sacramento Kings want to move. The owners are going to pick and choose which city is going to pay them to move there and fund the arena. There's all the talk about how much taxes and jobs it would bring, but we are talking about over 50 million dollars going to the Maloofs just for the Maloofs. Not for the team and not for the arena. It is going to take decades for the millions to repay itself.

Virginia Beach wants the team to move there and they want Virginia state to pay for part of it and they want to tax the residents of the city of Virginia Beach, and they want to tax the residents of nearby cities and counties, based on indirect benefits of having an NBA team in the area.

As for jobs, its not a factory. They only need to employ people during events. Most of those events only need part-time, minimum wage employees. There are a small number of mid-income jobs created by the arena and team. High income jobs aren't created but just relocated players, coaches, and executive staff.
 
Top