1/15
Good news: the "Putin system" is beginning to collapse. Exactly what I had predicted mathematically (in March) is happening, namely: The announced drastic tax increases in Russia (the highest tax increases in the history of modern Russia) as well as Putin's recently published slogans (according to which "everyone must work as if they were at the front") are dramatic signs that the toxicity of the Russian war economy is reaching a critical level.
What does "toxicity" mean:
If the cost of replacing material losses (in such a way that the speed of replacement is in balance with the speed of losses) is no longer within the scope of the financing of the state budget, then a system becomes unfinanceable. This unfinanceability is toxic for a system because it causes the system to collapse in the medium term (unless the war is won).
Russia is familiar with this type of toxicity; the USSR collapsed when the costs of the arms race (pushed by US President Ronald Reagan) could no longer be financed from the state budget, which led to the collapse of the state.
The situation in Russia today is even more dramatic than the situation in the USSR back then. Today it is not just an arms race, but an active war, and in this war there is NO balance between loss and replacement: high-quality military goods (eg modern air defense systems such as the "S-400 Triumf", or tanks and aircraft) can no longer be produced at a speed that is in balance with the rate of losses. And at the same time, Ukraine is compensating for its personnel disadvantages by using drones.
If Russian state revenues are further weakened NOW (e.g. by effective strikes against refineries) and if Russian supply routes are attacked NOW (if Ukraine receives all the weapons it needs for this), then this will massively accelerate the collapse of Russia, shorten the war and lead more quickly to a real peace.
Putin is a loser:
Does he have air superiority over Ukraine?
No. On the contrary, the extent of his superiority is diminishing.
Is Ukraine "demilitarized"?
No. On the contrary.
Has he prevented the expansion of NATO?
No. On the contrary.
Has he restored Russia's imperial greatness?
No. On the contrary, he is now just "the little partner of big China".
Putin is a poker player who can only bluff:
He can only threaten to escalate the war, but he cannot carry out this threat because Russia is far too inferior to NATO.
Putin's only hope: politicians in the West who are hesitant enough (in their efforts to support Ukraine) so that the war can be won "somehow" before Russia collapses.
We must not allow it to come to that.
If Ukraine wins and Russia loses, then the entire China-Iran-Russia axis loses. And that is in the best interest of humanity.
#UKRAINE
#UkraineNeverSurrenders
#ArmUkraineToWin
#ArmUkraineToWinNOW
2/15
RUSSIA IS DEFEATABLE. NOW MORE THAN EVER. #Putin himself knows that as well, which is exactly why he resorts to propaganda and empty nuclear threats (out of the old KGB concept toolbox) when he lacks real military strength. As history teaches us: RUSSIA IS A HISTORICAL LOSER
3/15
Yes, that's always important to remember.
4/15
That's simply the way it is.
5/15
Well said!
6/15
Absolutely right, in each and every single regard.
7/15
Much more CAN be done, that's right.
8/15
Prägnant und exakt auf den Punkt gebracht. Infolge seiner Drohungen wissen wir, dass wir auf dem richtigen Weg sind. Dass an der Verständnisfähigkeit des Herrn Olaf Zweifel angebracht sind, ist leider ebenfalls richtig.
9/15
Die zaudernden Politiker im Westen sind in der Tat ein Problem. Und sie sind Putins realistischste Hoffnung.
10/15
Thank you. I hope the content and meaning of this explanation will reach at least some of the hesitant politicians.
11/15
... and necessary to repeat over and over again, considering all the propaganda.
12/15
If the cost of replacing material losses (in such a way that the speed of replacement is in balance with the speed of losses) is no longer within the scope of the financing of the state budget, then a system becomes unfinanceable.
With mathematical inevitability.
13/15
Indeed, that would be good.
14/15
The calculation is definitely correct. Only the behavior of Western politicians can alter the outcome.
15/15
Exactly. Succinctly to the point.
To post tweets in this format, more info here: https://www.thecoli.com/threads/tips-and-tricks-for-posting-the-coli-megathread.984734/post-52211196