Video: Electric Thinking Cap, Improves Brain Stimulation

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
79,907
Reputation
14,208
Daps
190,230
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
I was watching the science channel and came across this. :lawd:

These words are emblazoned on the website Creativitycap.com, and they represent the vision of neuroscientist Allan Snyder. Snyder believes we all possess untapped powers of cognition, normally seen only in rare individuals called savants, and accessing them might take just a few jolts of electricity to the brain.

It sounds like a Michael Crichton plot, but Snyder, of the University of Sydney, Australia, says he wouldn’t be surprised to see a prototype of the creativity cap within a couple of years. His research suggests that brain stimulation improves people’s ability to solve difficult problems. But Snyder’s interpretation of his findings remains controversial, and the science of using brain stimulation to boost thinking is still in its early stages.

“I think it’s a bit of a minefield,” said psychologist Robyn Young of Flinders University in Australia, who has tried to replicate Snyder’s early experiments. “I’m not really sure whether the technology is developed that can turn it into a more accurate science.”

Snyder has long been fascinated by savants — people with a developmental brain disorder (often autism) or brain injury who display prowess in a particular area, such as mathematics, art or music, which far exceeds the norm. Kim Peek, who provided the inspiration for Dustin Hoffman’s character in the movie “Rain Man,” was a savant who could memorize entire books after a single reading, or instantly calculate what day of the week any calendar date fell on. But he had a severe mental disability that prevented him from performing simple actions such as buttoning his shirt.

Wisconsin psychiatrist and savant expert Darold Treffert describes a skill like Kim’s as an “island of genius that stands in stark contrast to the overall handicap.”

Other savants acquire their abilities after a severe brain injury or illness. Alonzo Clemons suffered a head injury as a toddler that left him mentally disabled, but endowed him with the ability to accurately sculpt beautiful clay animals after only briefly glimpsing them. And patients with frontotemporal dementia have been known to suddenly display artistic and musical abilities, like the successful businessman who developed dementia and started doing award-winning painting.

But not all savant abilities come with a trade-off, says Treffert. Sometimes it’s possible for otherwise normal people to have savant skills.

Snyder hypothesizes that all people possess savant-like abilities in a dormant form, but that savants have “privileged access” to less-processed, lower-level information. In a normal brain, top-down controls suppress the barrage of raw data our brains take in, enabling us to focus on the big picture.

“We all have that information,” Snyder said, “but our brains are deliberately wired not to see it.”

The nine dots problem. Image: Blleininger

Using brain stimulation, he thinks it’s possible to temporarily remove that mental suppression and unlock the savant inside each of us. In their latest study, published in April in Neuroscience Letters, Snyder and graduate student Richard Chi tested people’s performance on a geometric puzzle called the nine dots problem (right).

The goal is to connect all nine dots using just four straight lines, without lifting your pen up or retracing a line. It’s a classic problem that researchers have been giving people for a century, but in the majority of experiments, no participants are able to solve it, even with plenty of time and many attempts. (If you have tried and failed, here’s the solution.)

Snyder and Chi had their subjects attempt to solve the problem while wearing an electrode cap. After a few minutes without brain stimulation, half of the subjects received stimulation while the other half received no stimulation. Here’s the interesting part: Whereas none of the subjects solved the problem before brain stimulation, more than 40 percent of subjects in the stimulation group solved the problem after being zapped. Talk about being struck by inspiration.

In case you’re imagining some kind of Frankensteinian setup for electrifying people’s brains, it’s nothing like that. The technique, called transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS), involves applying a weak electrical current to the scalp through a pair of electrodes on sponges. It’s a widely used technique that is considered safe, with minor side effects. Other researchers have shown cognitive improvements using the same method applied to other brain areas, but Snyder and Chi are the first to use stimulation to mimic savant brain physiology.

Autism, left frontotemporal dementia, and savantism resulting from brain injury have all been associated with deficits in the left hemisphere of the brain. Though the left brain/right brain skill dichotomy is an oversimplification, they do specialize in function, says Treffert. The left brain, which is dominant in most people, is more heavily involved in language and reason, while the right brain plays a bigger role in visuospatial and artistic ability. Scientists theorize that in savants, limitations in left-brain function allow the right brain to compensate. In Snyder and Chi’s study, they applied stimulation to suppress brain activity in the left anterior temporal lobe while simultaneously exciting activity in the right anterior temporal lobe.


Often, our approach to a problem is shaped by our earlier experiences, making it harder to come up with new solutions. In a previous study, Snyder and Chi tested whether their brain stimulation method could make people more insightful while they performed “matchstick arithmetic,” in which they were given false equations written in Roman numerals with matches and had to make the equation true by moving one match. Solving each matchstick problem required a different strategy, and those who had the stimulation solved them faster, they found.

Snyder’s earlier studies used magnetic, rather than electrical, stimulation to try to elicit savant abilities. One study showed a change in artistic ability, while another found improved numerosity, the ability to precisely estimate a large number of objects without counting them.

But as of yet, not many of Snyder’s studies have been replicated. Australian psychologist Robyn Young did a study in 2004 that examined the effect of magnetic stimulation on savant-type skills such as drawing, memory, mathematics and calendar calculating. In five out of 17 subjects, some improvement was observed, but most of the findings weren’t statistically significant. A follow-up study failed to show any effect of the stimulation.

Young thinks the idea of improving cognition with brain stimulation is plausible, but “there were so many variables involved,” she said, such as where to stimulate and how long the effect lasts, that she dropped the work to pursue other research.

Supposing a creativity cap ever does become available, it raises many questions. Can we truly achieve the mental equivalent of a free lunch, without drawbacks in other areas of thinking? Perhaps the genius effect will subside after repeated use. As with any form of cognitive enhancement, there’s the question of ethics. Finally, as Young put it, “If everyone could play music brilliantly or be brilliant artists, it would minimize diversity.”
Unlock Your Inner Rain Man by Electrically Zapping Your Brain | Wired Science | Wired.com

or :hula:

ScienceDirect.com - Neuroscience Letters - Brain stimulation enables the solution of an inherently difficult problem


This video is piff, the lead scientist(Snyder) swag is through the roof(no homo), breh rocks the black cap to the side daily in a suit and tie. :damn:

Through the Wormhole S3E8 Mysteries of the Subconscious HQ - YouTube
 
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
375
Reputation
0
Daps
269
Reppin
L.A
You can actually build one of these on your own with a 9 volt battery, a resistor and some electrodes. For roughly $10. There's some youtube videos and schematics all around the web.

I personally haven't used it (considered it), nor would I recommend trying it, but many people have with success.
 

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
I was watching the science channel and came across this. :lawd:


Unlock Your Inner Rain Man by Electrically Zapping Your Brain | Wired Science | Wired.com

or :hula:

ScienceDirect.com - Neuroscience Letters - Brain stimulation enables the solution of an inherently difficult problem


This video is piff, the lead scientist(Snyder) swag is through the roof(no homo), breh rocks the black cap to the side daily in a suit and tie. :damn:

Through the Wormhole S3E8 Mysteries of the Subconscious HQ - YouTube

ol put your thinking cap on mofo.


seriously though are these available for purchase i'd like to gift one or two to a couple of our less stellar posters. Maybe a "thinking cap" fund could be started?
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
You can actually build one of these on your own with a 9 volt battery, a resistor and some electrodes. For roughly $10. There's some youtube videos and schematics all around the web.

I personally haven't used it (considered it), nor would I recommend trying it, but many people have with success.

lol I need to check this out. How horrible would it be if you fried your shyt and really did "unlock your inner rainman?" and ended up an idiot savant.
 
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
375
Reputation
0
Daps
269
Reppin
L.A
hmmmmm
does it work?

I'm going to be going back to school here in a few weeks and maybe this might be a nice little experiemnt :shaq2:

From the results on forums around the web, it sure does. Albeit they went with different companies or do-it-yourself kits which they built carefully. If you follow the instructions though you'll be fine, it's only a 1 to 1.5 mA current once a day for ~20 min. Although prolonged day after day use isn't thoroughly researched.

lol I need to check this out. How horrible would it be if you fried your shyt and really did "unlock your inner rainman?" and ended up an idiot savant.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Brown_Pride

All Star
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
6,416
Reputation
785
Daps
7,887
Reppin
Atheist for Jesus
From the results on forums around the web, it sure does. Albeit they went with different companies or do-it-yourself kits which they built carefully. If you follow the instructions though you'll be fine, it's only a 1 to 1.5 mA current once a day for ~20 min. Although prolonged day after day use isn't thoroughly researched.



Old Spice | Blown Mind - YouTube

... wtf why aren't we strapping kids up to these things every fukin day?

Once i get some search results from what happens after prolonged use i'm making one of these sons of biotch and strapping up the :hamster: i mean kids :smile:

seriously though 2.5x improvement to learning...i don't think people quite understand what 2.5x means. that's a shyt ton in terms of learning. (that's the actual technical term btw....shyt ton)
 
Joined
Jul 3, 2012
Messages
375
Reputation
0
Daps
269
Reppin
L.A
... wtf why aren't we strapping kids up to these things every fukin day?

Once i get some search results from what happens after prolonged use i'm making one of these sons of biotch and strapping up the :hamster: i mean kids :smile:

seriously though 2.5x improvement to learning...i don't think people quite understand what 2.5x means. that's a shyt ton in terms of learning. (that's the actual technical term btw....shyt ton)

I know this isn't a "quick fix," but if you and your kids want to learn anything effectively, here's some great advice from a physicist about learning technique:

Teaching (and Learning) Thinking Skills

I've just recently implemented that style, and it's working wonders (I'm going into my Senior year in college as a Physics major). If kids were taught this way from the start, their potential would be through the roof. You learn that style right now and your potential will go through the roof. Kids just have the advantage of having his skill at an early age.

A little sidetrack, but he goes in on the school system:
1. In recent years, schools have been placing more and more emphasis on a certain type of test. The following properties are typical of such tests:

There are 40 questions to be answered in 30 minutes.

There is time pressure; i.e. few students can answer all the questions in the allowed time.

Each question is multiple choice.

The questions are equally weighted.

I call such things “game-show tests”. They cause some serious problems, as we now discuss. (Additional discussion can be found in reference 1.)

2. It is distinctly unhelpful to place much weight on game-show tests. You can see at a glance that such tests have several built-in weaknesses.

Such questions are atypical of real-world situations. Suppose you get an office job or a factory job. Do you really think people are going to walk up to you and ask multiple-choice questions that you can answer in 45 seconds? Don’t count on it! Most real-world questions require you to think for a lot longer than 45 seconds.

It would be nice if the tests included a few questions that required actual thinking. However, alas, the format of the test does not permit this. This stems from the fact that the questions are equally weighted and there is time pressure. That means that if the test ever did have a question that required more than 45 seconds to answer, students would be well advised to skip that question and focus on the easier questions.

Because of the time pressure, and because of the wide range of topics that might be touched on by the questions, the students are encouraged – and well-nigh required – to become a mile wide and an inch deep. See reference 2 for more on this.

Under the terms of the ECLBE law (Every Child Left Behind Equally), testing is required, but the details have been implemented in a crazy way. The design of the tests has been delegated to the states. Each state has nothing to gain and everything to lose by having a test that actually measures anything. The entirely foreseeable result is that the test-vendors (who prepare the tests on behalf of the states) are engaged in a “race to the bottom”, preparing tests such that anyone can score well, whether they know anything or not.

3. I find that game-show tests are not good for predicting anything I care about. I would never hire somebody based on a good test score, and I would never reject somebody based on a bad test score. I’ve known too many absolutely brilliant people who didn’t do well on game-show tests.

I used to say that such tests don’t predict anything at all, but if things keep going the way they are, such tests will begin to predict success in school ... for the simple reason that success in school is being measured, more and more, by such tests. This is circular in a truly ghastly way. It encourages rote learning and discourages thinking.

4. There is a natural tendency for teachers to teach to the test. That can be either a good thing or a bad thing, depending on how good the test is. We need better tests. We need much, much better tests.

In particular, we need tests that measure thinking skills.

5. On the plus side: Most kids enjoy thinking. Most kids enjoy riddles, if properly presented. They entertain each other by telling riddles. Any reasonable-sized bookstore will carry books of riddles – including physics riddles – even though they don’t carry textbooks.

If you do it right, kids will increase their thinking skills and enjoy it.

6. On the minus side: In many (but not all) textbooks, the end-of-chapter problems do not require thinking, and indeed train students not to think. Instead, the problems call for rote regurgitation of factoids presented in the chapter.

After years of a steady diet of such problems, students will be alarmed and recalcitrant if you suddenly assign them homework that requires nontrivial thinking. You will have to explain that your course is different from other courses, past and present. Then you will have to patiently teach them the required thinking skills. Then you can assign problems that require thinking, with gradually increasing complexity.
 

Serious

Veteran
Supporter
Joined
Apr 30, 2012
Messages
79,907
Reputation
14,208
Daps
190,230
Reppin
1st Round Playoff Exits
seriously though 2.5x improvement to learning...i don't think people quite understand what 2.5x means. that's a shyt ton in terms of learning. (that's the actual technical term btw....shyt ton)
Yeah it hit me a moment ago, that I could do some serious research with this device. Imagine how fast I would be able to read.The retention rate would be off the charts.

Just subscribed to goflow :win:
 
Top