Vaccine advocate takes on the alternative medicine industry

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,002
Daps
132,749
Vaccine advocate takes on the alternative medicine industry - NBC News.com

Dr. Paul Offit doesn’t like getting threats. But the 62-year-old pediatrician at Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia says it goes with the territory when taking on powerful industries and interest groups whose beliefs are deeply rooted in emotion.

He’s ready for a tsunami of criticism with his latest foray into debunking popular wisdom – “Do You Believe in Magic?: The Sense and Nonsense of Alternative Medicine” in which he takes on the vitamin and herbal supplements industry, alternative medicine of all kinds, Congress and celebrity doctors who peddle their own products. It hits the shelves on Tuesday.

“Yes, I do get hate mail,” Offit admits. He makes the case that the vitamin industry in particular has successfully lobbied to keep itself unregulated while selling billions of pills to an eager and gullible public. “People think of dietary supplements as natural, benign and helpful,” Offit told NBC News. “People don’t think of them as drugs.”

Yet studies have shown that not only do vitamin supplements fail to lower cancer risk, but they can actually cause cancer – most notably the 1994 Finnish study that found smokers who took beta carotene – which the body converts to vitamin A – actually had a higher risk of lung cancer than men who didn’t take the supplements. Alternative therapies of all kinds are often not only of no benefit whatsoever -- they can be harmful, he notes.

Offit is best known for taking on vaccine doubters – people who worry that vaccinations might somehow harm children and whose fears culminated in a wave of support for the argument that childhood vaccines can cause autism. Offit has received death threats and even not-so-subtle telephone threats against his own children after he challenged these ideas in national media; they worsened when he wrote a book, “Autism’s False Prophets" that not only systematically took down the arguments but sought to expose some of the powerful money-making interests that were driving a supposed grassroots lobby.

But he’s challenging a much bigger group this time. According to the National Center for Health Statistics, more than half of Americans took some sort of dietary supplements in 2003-2006, 40 percent of them multivitamins.

Some are recommended – doctors routinely prescribe certain vitamins for pregnant women to prevent birth defects. But too much vitamin A can cause birth defects, so women must be careful. And the Institute of Medicine recently questioned the common practice of prescribing vitamin D for people whose levels are low.

Offit says it infuriates him to see not only ordinary citizens buy into the claims of homeopaths, naturopaths and the vitamin industry, but doctors and hospitals. He calls out Dr. Andrew Weil, Dr. Deepak Chopra and others, saying they have abandoned science for the thrill of celebrity that goes with evangelizing alternative medicine.

“They have this almost guru-like stature that you should listen to them,” Offit says. “It is the surety of their statements that draw you to them. They make you think they are someone who just knows. But it should be the strength of data, the strength of science, rather than personality, that decide what it is true.”

Weil, for instance, has promoted the plant kava as a non-addictive relaxant. “Seven years later, when kava was shown to cause severe liver damage, the FDA issued a warning against its use,” Offit writes. But few consumers are aware. Weil sells his own line of supplements.

Chopra sells a line of supplements, oils, books and even jewelry. “Chopra has helped wealthy businessmen, celebrities and politicians like Michael Jackson, Elizabeth Taylor, Winona Ryder, Debra Winger, Madonna, Mikhail Gorbachev. Michael Milken and Hillary Clinton find their inner space without feeling bad about being rich,” Offit writes.

Spokespeople for Weil and Chopra did not respond to requests for comment.

Offit, who helped invent the RotaTeq vaccine against rotavirus, is himself the frequent target to critics who say he has his own vested interest in promoting commercial pharmaceuticals. But drugs and vaccines that are regulated by the Food and Drug Administration are held to a standard, Offit argues. Their makers have to prove not only that they work, but that they are safe.

And he answers his critics with an anger and determination born from watching children die.

“I see myself as a child advocate,” Offit says. Profits from his book go to the hospital where he works.

He famously tells how he started his work on a rotavirus vaccine after watching an otherwise perfectly healthy 9-month-old girl die of the infection while he was finishing his medical training. Just this year, Offit says, a child died of influenza at his hospital. The child’s parents hadn’t believed in the need to vaccinate against flu.

“I had to watch those parents go through the worst thing a parent can go through, which is watch that child die very slowly, every day, until they are dead,” he says. “I don’t see how you can’t be moved by that.”

Offit starts his book with the case of Joey Hofbauer, who died at age 10 of Hodgkin’s disease after his parents subjected him to a series of alternative treatments instead of standard cancer therapy that would have given him a 95 percent chance of survival.

“Joey Hofbauer’s story, while extreme, contains much of what attracts people to alternative therapies today: a heartfelt distrust of modern medicine,” he writes.

Offit describes how the vitamin industry used this distrust to lobby Congress to give it a pass. The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act (DSHEA), passed in 1994, specifically exempts vitamins and supplements from FDA's pre-marketing scrutiny, although the agency can warn against products found to be dangerous.

“Although the supplement industry skillfully manipulated people into believing that the Supplement Act was about the freedom to make health choices, it was really about freeing the supplement industry to offer unsafe choices,” Offit writes. “If knowledge is power, DSHEA is powerlessness.”

People want to believe that because something is “natural”, it must not only be safer, but must somehow work better than synthesized drugs. But many drugs on the market, from antibiotics to chemotherapy agents, are either based on natural products or taken directly from plants. Herbal products bought in stores can have many of the same side-effects as prescription drugs – but because they aren’t regulated the same way, people don’t know it.

Offit gives Vioxx as a case in point. Vioxx, approved in 1999, was a huge hit for treating arthritis pain. It’s a more refined version of the drugs in the same class as aspirin and ibuprofen, without causing the stomach bleeding that can make them dangerous. Tests showed it could raise the risk of heart attacks and Vioxx’s maker pulled it off the market.

“So which is more dangerous: Vioxx or vitamins? Indeed, both have dangers,” Offit writes. “The better question is, why does everybody know that Vioxx can cause heart disease and nobody knows that megavitamins can cause cancer? The answer is that we have chosen not to know.”

Offit doesn’t accuse the public of being stupid. “I think we are generally pretty cynical as a society. We are certainly skeptical of Big Pharma,” he says. “Yet when people look at these supplements or megavitamins, they suspend all disbelief.”

One explanation is extremely sophisticated marketing, Offit says. “You have to give credit to the industry – they have set themselves up as different from big pharma, when they are exactly the same as big pharma,” he says.

Another is the sense of self-control that people can get from using herbs, vitamins or supplements. “You can be your own doctor,” he says.

But at least with prescription drugs there are watchdogs – not the just FDA, but a drug’s competitors, and the academic research community. While studies are done on vitamins and supplements, it’s not as common as with prescription drugs. “Without data, you are strictly relying on infomercials and internet chatrooms and your friends,” he says.

Anecdotes are powerful, Offit adds, but the story of one or two people cannot outweigh data involving thousands.

One answer is to look for what data there is. The National Institutes of Health now has a center set up to test the claims of alternative treatments, from chiropracty to acupuncture. The National Center for Complementary and Alternative Medicine has found that acupuncture can relieve some forms of nausea and that no supplement helps hepatitis C.

The Cochrane Library, which looks at published studies that have been done with a certain level of scientific rigor, has found that garlic doesn’t help leg pain caused by clogged arteries, that the amino acid creatine can help patients with inherited muscular diseases and that music can calm you before surgery.

"The answer is to be a smart consumer," Offit advises. "We should demand that claims be supported."
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,002
Daps
132,749
Dude is spreading misinfo without real evidence and proof.

On the contrary, he's advocating the use of empirical evidence in the form of clinical trials and science to inform medical decisions.

What misinfo is being propagated here?

Vioxx isn't the same as Multivitamins nor do vitamins cause massive deaths since it's usage.

He didn't say megavitamins and Vioxx are the same. He's saying both have risks (Vioxx-heart disease, megavitamins-cancer), but the former is publicized adn the latter is marketed as somehow being without any harm because it's "natural," which means essentially nothing medically.

His main agenda here is "Vaccines only, no vitamins, nor essential nutrients and minerals." Pretty sick for a pediatrician.

That's not what he said at all. Read the article. Nowhere does he say don't take any vitamins and nutrients, nor does any doctor. He's saying a lot of vitamins and supplements are marketed as "natural medicine" and not regulated or have undergone the proper clinical trials, and thus are not based on science, whereas vaccines are and are proven to save lives.

If there are any alternative medicines that are based upon sound science and really do work, fine. Let's see the data.
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Bushed
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,920
Reputation
5,122
Daps
114,953
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Activist Post: Lead Gardasil Vaccine Creator Confesses to Clear Conscience

Lead Gardasil Vaccine Creator Confesses to Clear Conscience

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Dr-Diane-Harper.jpg.


Heather Callaghan
Activist Post


Media, medical and science claims love to push that untreated HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) perhaps-maybe-someday can lead to cervical cancer. So far, it can't be confirmed if getting Gardasil and Cervavix actually take cervical cancer cases down. What's really shaky is the safety of a seriously under-evaluated vaccine pushed on both young girls and boys who may or may not become sexually active soon and may never contract HPV. According to the manufacturers, the vaccine only addresses 4 out of 40 HPV strains.

What is confirmed is that 44 girls have died after vaccination for HPV and many more have suffered serious bizarre side effects: Guillain Barré Syndrome (crippling and leading to permanent paralysis and suffocation), brain inflammation, blood clots, lupus, seizures. A whopping 15,037 girls have serious side effects as reported to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.) from Gardasil alone - and this doesn't include reports from parents who couldn't make it through all the VAERS hurdle-jumping. Actually, the CDC reports 68 possible deaths and nearly 19,000 VAERS. Trials of the vaccine were done on 15-year-olds and up although the vaccine targets kids as young as 9 and is sometimes given without parental permission, even backed by certain state legislation (see more below). Does anyone else also find it bizarre that a couple side effects are actual diseases like Guillain Barré and lupus?

You won't hear this on the 6 O'Clock news, but lead researcher-developer Dr. Diane Harper shocked audiences when she bravely turned mid-stream on her corporate handlers while she was supposed to be promoting them and HPV vaccines.
She was at 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through the 4th in 2009.

SouthWeb reports:

Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle.

She spoke openly of the information above, and later said she did it so she could "sleep at night."

She says:

About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.
Attendees walked away seriously questioning the vaccines.

I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all. – Joan Robinson

With all the above information, why else should parents take note? Legislation is in place to allow young teens to get the vaccine without parental knowledge. California, for instance, has a law in place for this. One grandmother there took protest to a boy who was vaccinated without permission. The same thing happened to a girl in Detroit, Michigan last year. Non-ultra Orthodox Jewish parents are also raising concerns and opting out.

If you want to learn more about how studies are skewed and packaged, look into reading a book called Trust Us, We're Experts!

Again I implore people to break out of this paradigm - it really isn't that much a leap of faith when you see that the solutions offered cause irreparable harm and there is little-to-no accountability. I just want to briefly suggest looking into homeopathic nosodes as a much, much safer and profound way to alleviate disease - no part of the disease exists in them. They were around since the 1800s but were quelled by the coming pharmaceuticals that could be patented.

Even Louis Pasteur reportedly admitted on his death bed that the theory behind the homeopathic solutions (Terrain theory) was more sound than his belief in Germ theory which is what promoted vaccine use from the beginning. Meaning terrain (you, your immuno-barrier) is far more more important for health than a germ stopping by to say "Hi." And please see a good naturopathic doctor to build that immunity, alleviate toxicity and empower yourself in the face of disease.
 

Dusty Bake Activate

Fukk your corny debates
Joined
May 1, 2012
Messages
39,078
Reputation
6,002
Daps
132,749
Activist Post: Lead Gardasil Vaccine Creator Confesses to Clear Conscience

Lead Gardasil Vaccine Creator Confesses to Clear Conscience

Saturday, July 6, 2013

Dr-Diane-Harper.jpg.


Heather Callaghan
Activist Post


Media, medical and science claims love to push that untreated HPV (Human Papilloma Virus) perhaps-maybe-someday can lead to cervical cancer. So far, it can't be confirmed if getting Gardasil and Cervavix actually take cervical cancer cases down. What's really shaky is the safety of a seriously under-evaluated vaccine pushed on both young girls and boys who may or may not become sexually active soon and may never contract HPV. According to the manufacturers, the vaccine only addresses 4 out of 40 HPV strains.

What is confirmed is that 44 girls have died after vaccination for HPV and many more have suffered serious bizarre side effects: Guillain Barré Syndrome (crippling and leading to permanent paralysis and suffocation), brain inflammation, blood clots, lupus, seizures. A whopping 15,037 girls have serious side effects as reported to Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (V.A.E.R.S.) from Gardasil alone - and this doesn't include reports from parents who couldn't make it through all the VAERS hurdle-jumping. Actually, the CDC reports 68 possible deaths and nearly 19,000 VAERS. Trials of the vaccine were done on 15-year-olds and up although the vaccine targets kids as young as 9 and is sometimes given without parental permission, even backed by certain state legislation (see more below). Does anyone else also find it bizarre that a couple side effects are actual diseases like Guillain Barré and lupus?

You won't hear this on the 6 O'Clock news, but lead researcher-developer Dr. Diane Harper shocked audiences when she bravely turned mid-stream on her corporate handlers while she was supposed to be promoting them and HPV vaccines.
She was at 4th International Public Conference on Vaccination, which took place in Reston, Virginia on Oct. 2nd through the 4th in 2009.

SouthWeb reports:

Dr. Harper explained in her presentation that the cervical cancer risk in the U.S. is already extremely low, and that vaccinations are unlikely to have any effect upon the rate of cervical cancer in the United States. In fact, 70% of all H.P.V. infections resolve themselves without treatment in a year, and the number rises to well over 90% in two years. Harper also mentioned the safety angle.

She spoke openly of the information above, and later said she did it so she could "sleep at night."

She says:

About eight in every ten women who have been sexually active will have H.P.V. at some stage of their life. Normally there are no symptoms, and in 98 per cent of cases it clears itself. But in those cases where it doesn’t, and isn’t treated, it can lead to pre-cancerous cells which may develop into cervical cancer.
Attendees walked away seriously questioning the vaccines.

I came away from the talk with the perception that the risk of adverse side effects is so much greater than the risk of cervical cancer, I couldn’t help but question why we need the vaccine at all. – Joan Robinson

With all the above information, why else should parents take note? Legislation is in place to allow young teens to get the vaccine without parental knowledge. California, for instance, has a law in place for this. One grandmother there took protest to a boy who was vaccinated without permission. The same thing happened to a girl in Detroit, Michigan last year. Non-ultra Orthodox Jewish parents are also raising concerns and opting out.

If you want to learn more about how studies are skewed and packaged, look into reading a book called Trust Us, We're Experts!

Again I implore people to break out of this paradigm - it really isn't that much a leap of faith when you see that the solutions offered cause irreparable harm and there is little-to-no accountability. I just want to briefly suggest looking into homeopathic nosodes as a much, much safer and profound way to alleviate disease - no part of the disease exists in them. They were around since the 1800s but were quelled by the coming pharmaceuticals that could be patented.

Even Louis Pasteur reportedly admitted on his death bed that the theory behind the homeopathic solutions (Terrain theory) was more sound than his belief in Germ theory which is what promoted vaccine use from the beginning. Meaning terrain (you, your immuno-barrier) is far more more important for health than a germ stopping by to say "Hi." And please see a good naturopathic doctor to build that immunity, alleviate toxicity and empower yourself in the face of disease.

Of course you LLE nikkas come with your bullshyt websites and exponential exaggerations of anecdotal comments that express mild skepticism.

HPV vaccine reduces cancer virus in girls by 56%

HPV Vaccine Dramatically Cuts Number of Infections in Teen Girls | PBS NewsHour | June 20, 2013 | PBS
 

newworldafro

DeeperThanRapBiggerThanHH
Bushed
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
50,920
Reputation
5,122
Daps
114,953
Reppin
In the Silver Lining
Of course you LLE nikkas come with your bullshyt websites and exponential exaggerations of anecdotal comments that express mild skepticism.

HPV vaccine reduces cancer virus in girls by 56%

HPV Vaccine Dramatically Cuts Number of Infections in Teen Girls | PBS NewsHour | June 20, 2013 | PBS



[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MCbHkGmXv9Q"]HPV (Gardasil) Vaccine Dangers - CNN - VaccinationEducation.com - YouTube[/ame]

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R2z6RK2uTWc"]Gardasil - The Damage is Done: From A Best Friend's View - YouTube[/ame]
 
Last edited by a moderator:

CouldntBeMeTho

Chairman Meow
Supporter
Joined
Jul 14, 2012
Messages
47,919
Reputation
21,322
Daps
272,185
Reppin
Dog Shooting Squad Of Islamabad
yes vaccine science is real, but you cant trust what's put into anything these days. go ahead and eat gmo, drink fluoride, and get vaccinated for things you don't need to.

[ame="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLFYbG4kl38"]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CLFYbG4kl38[/ame]
 
Joined
Jun 24, 2012
Messages
39,797
Reputation
-160
Daps
65,110
Reppin
NULL
On the contrary, he's advocating the use of empirical evidence in the form of clinical trials and science to inform medical decisions.



What misinfo is being propagated here?



He didn't say megavitamins and Vioxx are the same. He's saying both have risks (Vioxx-heart disease, megavitamins-cancer), but the former is publicized adn the latter is marketed as somehow being without any harm because it's "natural," which means essentially nothing medically.



That's not what he said at all. Read the article. Nowhere does he say don't take any vitamins and nutrients, nor does any doctor. He's saying a lot of vitamins and supplements are marketed as "natural medicine" and not regulated or have undergone the proper clinical trials, and thus are not based on science, whereas vaccines are and are proven to save lives.

If there are any alternative medicines that are based upon sound science and really do work, fine. Let's see the data.

1. You are seeing a small point in this whole story though. He may have said that but that isn't his point. He is bashing Alternative Medicine as a "Snake Oil" and then stays acting like Vaccines are the gospel. Dude needs to get his head checked. The man neither cares for science to inform medical decisions or clinical trials b/c isn't the type to say he is wrong. He is going by one study of vitamins( which was clearly outdated and heavy in propganda) to use as his thesis for bashing alternative medicine.


2. Why is Vioxx and Vitamins even in the same sentence? Because he wants to tell people they are the same. Both have dangers.....everything has dangers....water, air, the essential elements of the earth? I forgot Vaccines don't have danger since he is a advocate. :rudy:

3. I read the article...this man neither cares for children or the truth. This man is making maybe making 90,000 a year hearing screaming children and he was offered more money with vaccine support from Big Pharma which has given many in this man's position 100,000 extra.

Doctors pharma list: Doctors list reveals who's getting big pharma money - Orlando Sentinel

Doctors paid millions to shill for Big Pharma - Salon.com

3A. He states which proves my point "Yet studies have shown that not only do vitamin supplements fail to lower cancer risk, but they can actually cause cancer – most notably the 1994 Finnish study that found smokers who took beta carotene – which the body converts to vitamin A – actually had a higher risk of lung cancer than men who didn’t take the supplements. Alternative therapies of all kinds are often not only of no benefit whatsoever -- they can be harmful, he notes.

One study of Finnish but no other study.
 

Shogun

Veteran
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
25,512
Reputation
5,966
Daps
63,074
Reppin
Knicks
1. You are seeing a small point in this whole story though. He may have said that but that isn't his point. He is bashing Alternative Medicine as a "Snake Oil" and then stays acting like Vaccines are the gospel. Dude needs to get his head checked. The man neither cares for science to inform medical decisions or clinical trials b/c isn't the type to say he is wrong. He is going by one study of vitamins( which was clearly outdated and heavy in propganda) to use as his thesis for bashing alternative medicine.


2. Why is Vioxx and Vitamins even in the same sentence? Because he wants to tell people they are the same. Both have dangers.....everything has dangers....water, air, the essential elements of the earth? I forgot Vaccines don't have danger since he is a advocate. :rudy:

3. I read the article...this man neither cares for children or the truth. This man is making maybe making 90,000 a year hearing screaming children and he was offered more money with vaccine support from Big Pharma which has given many in this man's position 100,000 extra.

Doctors pharma list: Doctors list reveals who's getting big pharma money - Orlando Sentinel

Doctors paid millions to shill for Big Pharma - Salon.com

3A. He states which proves my point "Yet studies have shown that not only do vitamin supplements fail to lower cancer risk, but they can actually cause cancer – most notably the 1994 Finnish study that found smokers who took beta carotene – which the body converts to vitamin A – actually had a higher risk of lung cancer than men who didn’t take the supplements. Alternative therapies of all kinds are often not only of no benefit whatsoever -- they can be harmful, he notes.

One study of Finnish but no other study.

I don't always agree with you, but props for always coming correct
 
Top